Impact of mid-glacial ice sheets on the recovery time of the AMOC: Implications on the frequent DO cycles during the mid-glacial period

S. Sherriff-Tadano, A. Abe‐Ouchi
{"title":"Impact of mid-glacial ice sheets on the recovery time of the AMOC: Implications on the frequent DO cycles during the mid-glacial period","authors":"S. Sherriff-Tadano, A. Abe‐Ouchi","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-7844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n <p><span>Paleo reconstructions such as ice cores have revealed that the glacial period experienced frequent climate shifts between warm interstadials and cold stadials. The duration of these climate modes varied during glacial periods, and that both the interstadials and stadials were shorter during mid-glacial compared with early glacial period. Recent studies showed that the duration of the interstdials was controlled by the Antarctic temperature through its impact on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). However, similar relation was not found for the stadials, suggesting that other climate factors (e.g., differences in ice sheet size, greenhouse gases and insolation) might have played a role. In this study, we investigate the role of glacial ice sheets on the duration of stadials. For this purpose, freshwater hosing experiments are conducted with an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model MIROC4m under early-glacial and mid-glacial conditions. Then, a sensitivity experiment is conducted modifying only the configuration of the ice sheets.&#160; The impact of mid-glacial ice sheets on the duration of the stadials is evaluated by comparing the recovery time of the AMOC after the cessation of the freshwater forcing. We find that the expansion of glacial ice sheets during mid-glacial shortens the recovery time of the AMOC. Partially coupled experiments, which switch the surface winds between the two experiments, show that the differences in the surface wind cause the shorter recovery time under mid-glacial ice sheet. The wind shortens the recovery time by increasing the surface salinity and decreasing the sea ice at the deepwater formation region. Thus the results suggest that differences in the surface wind between mid-glacial and early glacial ice sheets play an important role in causing shorter stadials during mid-glacial period.</span></p>\n","PeriodicalId":14836,"journal":{"name":"Japan Geoscience Union","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Geoscience Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-7844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paleo reconstructions such as ice cores have revealed that the glacial period experienced frequent climate shifts between warm interstadials and cold stadials. The duration of these climate modes varied during glacial periods, and that both the interstadials and stadials were shorter during mid-glacial compared with early glacial period. Recent studies showed that the duration of the interstdials was controlled by the Antarctic temperature through its impact on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). However, similar relation was not found for the stadials, suggesting that other climate factors (e.g., differences in ice sheet size, greenhouse gases and insolation) might have played a role. In this study, we investigate the role of glacial ice sheets on the duration of stadials. For this purpose, freshwater hosing experiments are conducted with an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model MIROC4m under early-glacial and mid-glacial conditions. Then, a sensitivity experiment is conducted modifying only the configuration of the ice sheets.  The impact of mid-glacial ice sheets on the duration of the stadials is evaluated by comparing the recovery time of the AMOC after the cessation of the freshwater forcing. We find that the expansion of glacial ice sheets during mid-glacial shortens the recovery time of the AMOC. Partially coupled experiments, which switch the surface winds between the two experiments, show that the differences in the surface wind cause the shorter recovery time under mid-glacial ice sheet. The wind shortens the recovery time by increasing the surface salinity and decreasing the sea ice at the deepwater formation region. Thus the results suggest that differences in the surface wind between mid-glacial and early glacial ice sheets play an important role in causing shorter stadials during mid-glacial period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中冰期冰盖对AMOC恢复时间的影响:对中冰期频繁DO旋回的影响
冰芯等古重建表明,冰期经历了温暖间冰期和寒冷间冰期之间频繁的气候变化。这些气候模态的持续时间在不同冰期有所不同,中冰期间冰期和间冰期均较早冰期短。最近的研究表明,间隙期的持续时间是由南极温度通过其对大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)的影响而控制的。然而,在冰川上没有发现类似的关系,这表明其他气候因素(如冰盖大小、温室气体和日照的差异)可能起了作用。在这项研究中,我们研究了冰川冰盖对冰期持续时间的作用。为此,在早冰期和中冰期条件下,利用大气-海洋环流模式MIROC4m进行了淡水冲洗试验。然后,只修改冰盖的结构进行灵敏度实验。 通过比较淡水强迫停止后AMOC的恢复时间来评估中冰原对冰期持续时间的影响。研究发现,中冰期冰盖的扩张缩短了AMOC的恢复时间。部分耦合实验在两个实验之间切换地表风,结果表明地表风的差异导致中冰期冰盖下的恢复时间更短。在深水地层区,风通过增加地表盐度和减少海冰来缩短恢复时间。结果表明,中冰期和早冰期地表风的差异是造成中冰期冰碛物较短的重要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tectonic Landform and Paleoseismic Activity of the Northernmost Sumatran Fault, Aceh Province, Indonesia Pressure-to-depth conversion models for metamorphic rocks: derivation and applications Standardized Variability Index (SVI): A multiscale index to assess the variability of precipitation Overpressured underthrust sediment in the Nankai Trough forearc inferred from high-frequency receiver function inversion Simple Topographic Parameter for Along-trench Friction Distribution of Shallow Megathrust Fault
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1