Symbolische Kommunikation über Festungen. Machiavelli und der Fortifikationsdiskurs im 16. Jahrhundert

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG Pub Date : 2015-05-11 DOI:10.3790/ZHF.42.1.1
Stefano Saracino
{"title":"Symbolische Kommunikation über Festungen. Machiavelli und der Fortifikationsdiskurs im 16. Jahrhundert","authors":"Stefano Saracino","doi":"10.3790/ZHF.42.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Symbolic Communication about Fortresses. Machiavelli and the Treatises on Fortification in the 16th Century Scholarship on Machiavelli (old and new) has emphasized that the Florentine’s military theory was outdated and neglected important recent technological developments. The article questions this point of view by analyzing Machiavelli’s treatment of the topic of fortification. In his major political works Machiavelli claims that fortresses are useless from a military perspective and that they have detrimental effects on the political sphere. A close reading of the chapters concerning fortification in „Il Principe“ and the „Discorsi“ as well as of the reactions to Machiavelli’s assumptions by early modern authors of treatises on fortification reveals the Florentine’s intention to make a political, rather than a military statement in his discussion of fortresses. Using hyperbolic rhetoric and referring to the republican topos of the building of fortresses as an identification mark of tyrannical g...","PeriodicalId":54000,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":"85 1","pages":"1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/ZHF.42.1.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Symbolic Communication about Fortresses. Machiavelli and the Treatises on Fortification in the 16th Century Scholarship on Machiavelli (old and new) has emphasized that the Florentine’s military theory was outdated and neglected important recent technological developments. The article questions this point of view by analyzing Machiavelli’s treatment of the topic of fortification. In his major political works Machiavelli claims that fortresses are useless from a military perspective and that they have detrimental effects on the political sphere. A close reading of the chapters concerning fortification in „Il Principe“ and the „Discorsi“ as well as of the reactions to Machiavelli’s assumptions by early modern authors of treatises on fortification reveals the Florentine’s intention to make a political, rather than a military statement in his discussion of fortresses. Using hyperbolic rhetoric and referring to the republican topos of the building of fortresses as an identification mark of tyrannical g...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就象教堂上的象征性交流马基雅维利十六岁的选举会议世纪
关于堡垒的符号交流。关于马基雅维利(新旧)的学术研究强调,佛罗伦萨的军事理论已经过时,并且忽视了最近重要的技术发展。本文通过分析马基雅维利对设防主题的处理,对这一观点提出质疑。在他的主要政治著作中,马基雅维利声称,从军事角度来看,堡垒是无用的,它们对政治领域有有害的影响。仔细阅读《Principe》和《Discorsi》中有关防御工事的章节,以及早期现代关于防御工事的论文作者对马基雅维利假设的反应,就会发现佛罗伦萨人在讨论堡垒时的意图是政治的,而不是军事的。使用夸张的修辞,并将建造堡垒的共和主题作为专制统治的标志……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Das Arbeitsgebiet der ZHF umfaßt die europäische Geschichte etwa vom 13. bis 19. Jahrhundert. Neben der politischen Geschichte werden in besonderem Maße auch Rechtsgeschichte, Kulturgeschichte sowie Sozialgeschichte berücksichtigt. Neuerscheinungen zu den genannten Gebieten werden in einem umfangreichen Rezensionsteil besprochen.
期刊最新文献
Die Autonomiestädte der Frühen Neuzeit „Souveränitätskrise“ und dauerhafte Kontrolle des „Vorfeldes“? Die Hochphase des deutschen Versklavungshandels Nur mit Papier, Feder und Wachs „Darzu mancher Mann sich viel zu schwach unnd zu wenig Befinden wu‍[e]‌rde“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1