Comparative effects of enarapril versus losartan on the prevention of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria

M. Oguri, Y. Ohyama, Tetsuya Nakamura, S. Tomono, M. Kurabayashi
{"title":"Comparative effects of enarapril versus losartan on the prevention of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria","authors":"M. Oguri, Y. Ohyama, Tetsuya Nakamura, S. Tomono, M. Kurabayashi","doi":"10.1159/000497664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A prospective randomized open-labeled study was performed to compare the renoprotective effects of enarapril and losartan on the development of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. Diabetic patients who have hypertension and microalbuminuria at base line (n=19) were recruited. Enarapril (n=11) or losartan (n=8) was randomly chosen by envelope methods and was prescribed for one year. At the end of this study, the blood pressure of patients in these two groups decreased significantly. Urine albumin-creatinine ratio (U-ACR) also decreased in these two groups, however, U-ACR of enarapril group was not significantly different from that of losartan group at any time of this study. Body mass index, HbA1c, blood pressure, and serum lipid profiles were not significantly different between the two groups. From these results, we conclude that the effects of enarapril and losartan on the development of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients along with hypertension seem to be equivalent in terms of clinical renoprotection.","PeriodicalId":34679,"journal":{"name":"Dubai Diabetes and Endocrinology Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dubai Diabetes and Endocrinology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000497664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A prospective randomized open-labeled study was performed to compare the renoprotective effects of enarapril and losartan on the development of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. Diabetic patients who have hypertension and microalbuminuria at base line (n=19) were recruited. Enarapril (n=11) or losartan (n=8) was randomly chosen by envelope methods and was prescribed for one year. At the end of this study, the blood pressure of patients in these two groups decreased significantly. Urine albumin-creatinine ratio (U-ACR) also decreased in these two groups, however, U-ACR of enarapril group was not significantly different from that of losartan group at any time of this study. Body mass index, HbA1c, blood pressure, and serum lipid profiles were not significantly different between the two groups. From these results, we conclude that the effects of enarapril and losartan on the development of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients along with hypertension seem to be equivalent in terms of clinical renoprotection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
依那普利与氯沙坦预防2型糖尿病伴微量白蛋白尿患者糖尿病肾病的疗效比较
一项前瞻性随机开放标签研究比较了依那普利和氯沙坦对2型糖尿病合并高血压患者微量白蛋白尿发生的肾保护作用。在基线时伴有高血压和微量白蛋白尿的糖尿病患者(n=19)被招募。采用包络法随机选择依那普利(n=11)或氯沙坦(n=8),处方1年。研究结束时,两组患者血压均明显下降。两组的尿白蛋白-肌酐比值(U-ACR)也有所下降,但在本研究的任何时间,依那普利组的U-ACR与氯沙坦组的U-ACR无显著差异。体重指数、糖化血红蛋白、血压和血脂在两组之间无显著差异。从这些结果,我们得出结论,依那普利和氯沙坦对伴有高血压的2型糖尿病患者微量白蛋白尿的影响似乎在临床肾保护方面是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Editorial – Publisher Transition Dynamics: Embracing the Change for Dubai Diabetes and Endocrinology Journal Hypoglycaemia in a Child Unmasks a Unique Association Psychosocial Factors and the Role of Family in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics of Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Admissions to COVID-19 Free UAE Tertiary Center during Pandemic From Clinical Trial Evidence to Clinical Guidelines: Perspectives on REWIND from Clinicians in the Gulf and Levant Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1