Auditory Working Memory Capacity in Congenitally Blind Children: Comparative Study with Normal

N. N
{"title":"Auditory Working Memory Capacity in Congenitally Blind Children: Comparative Study with Normal","authors":"N. N","doi":"10.19080/gjo.2021.24.556133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"to these studies, there have been many studies have found no added advantage for blind individuals [11-16]. It is a well-known fact that the occipital lobe gets activated when processing visual stimuli in normal healthy sighted individuals. In blind individuals it has been found that it is active during verbal processing [17] and performance of memory tasks [7,18]. These results suggest that the advantages found in the be-havioural tests may rely on cross-modal plasticity that enables visual areas to encode stimuli and tasks of other modalities in early blind individuals. Recent studies found that congenitally blind and early blind subjects perform better than late-blind subjects and normal on several auditory perception task [19-21]. These studies point to the plasticity of the sensory systems when an individual is confronted with the loss of a particular modality. However, these studies do not inform us about the use and plasticity of the working memory system, but only about the in-teresting possibility of plasticity of one of the components, i.e., the visuospatial sketch pad that might be replaced by another sensory modality. Congenitally blind individuals have been shown to compensate for their loss of sight by developing extraordinary abilities in their remaining senses. An ongoing debate regarding whether blind individuals can compensate for their sensory handicap by developing exceptional abilities in their remaining senses (com-pensatory hypothesis), or by becoming severely handicapped (the deficit hypothesis) has yielded contrasting positions. Owing to such findings the present study was designed to assess the au ditory memory abilities in congenitally blind children to throw a light on the research concerning the compensation for the loss of sight through other normal modality information and to comment on the plasticity of working memory system in blind.","PeriodicalId":12708,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/gjo.2021.24.556133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

to these studies, there have been many studies have found no added advantage for blind individuals [11-16]. It is a well-known fact that the occipital lobe gets activated when processing visual stimuli in normal healthy sighted individuals. In blind individuals it has been found that it is active during verbal processing [17] and performance of memory tasks [7,18]. These results suggest that the advantages found in the be-havioural tests may rely on cross-modal plasticity that enables visual areas to encode stimuli and tasks of other modalities in early blind individuals. Recent studies found that congenitally blind and early blind subjects perform better than late-blind subjects and normal on several auditory perception task [19-21]. These studies point to the plasticity of the sensory systems when an individual is confronted with the loss of a particular modality. However, these studies do not inform us about the use and plasticity of the working memory system, but only about the in-teresting possibility of plasticity of one of the components, i.e., the visuospatial sketch pad that might be replaced by another sensory modality. Congenitally blind individuals have been shown to compensate for their loss of sight by developing extraordinary abilities in their remaining senses. An ongoing debate regarding whether blind individuals can compensate for their sensory handicap by developing exceptional abilities in their remaining senses (com-pensatory hypothesis), or by becoming severely handicapped (the deficit hypothesis) has yielded contrasting positions. Owing to such findings the present study was designed to assess the au ditory memory abilities in congenitally blind children to throw a light on the research concerning the compensation for the loss of sight through other normal modality information and to comment on the plasticity of working memory system in blind.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天性失明儿童听觉工作记忆容量与正常儿童的比较研究
对于这些研究,已经有很多研究没有发现盲人个体的额外优势[11-16]。众所周知,在正常健康视力的个体中,枕叶在处理视觉刺激时被激活。在盲人个体中,它被发现在言语处理[17]和记忆任务的表现[7,18]中是活跃的。这些结果表明,在行为-行为测试中发现的优势可能依赖于跨模态可塑性,使视觉区域能够编码早期失明个体的其他模态的刺激和任务。最近的研究发现,先天失明和早期失明受试者在一些听觉感知任务上的表现优于晚期失明受试者和正常人[19-21]。这些研究指出,当个体面临失去一种特定的形态时,感觉系统的可塑性。然而,这些研究并没有告诉我们工作记忆系统的使用和可塑性,而只是关于其中一个组成部分的可塑性的有趣可能性,即视觉空间草图可能被另一种感觉方式所取代。研究表明,先天失明的人可以通过在剩余感官上发展非凡的能力来弥补他们的视力损失。关于盲人是否可以通过发展其剩余感官的特殊能力(补偿假说)或通过变得严重残疾(缺陷假说)来补偿他们的感官缺陷,目前正在进行的辩论产生了截然不同的观点。鉴于此,本研究旨在对先天失明儿童的听觉记忆能力进行评估,为通过其他正常模态信息来补偿视力丧失的研究提供线索,并对盲人工作记忆系统的可塑性进行评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Autoimmune Hypothesis in Meniere’s Disease: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Future Perspectives Bilateral Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Comparative Evaluation Between the Efficacy of Fluoride Based Toothpaste (ParodontaxTM) and Calcium Based Toothpaste (Colgate) on Established Gingivitis Comparison of Quality-of-Life Changes in Otoplasty Patients of Y and Z Generations using the GBI The Effects of Oral Challenges on Antibiotic Prescribing Practices for Acute Bacterial Sinusitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1