Divergence in Women’s Employment in Korea and Japan: What Shapes the Different Patterns around Childbirth?

J. Nishimura, Hyunji Kwon
{"title":"Divergence in Women’s Employment in Korea and Japan: What Shapes the Different Patterns around Childbirth?","authors":"J. Nishimura, Hyunji Kwon","doi":"10.21588/DNS.2016.45.3.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With female employment patterns and their ever-diverging degrees in Korea and Japan, this paper identifies which factors influence women’s labor supply around childbirth in each country, and draws cross-country analysis. It also aims to understand the different social context of each labor market, general attitudes towards female employment and work-life balance in two countries. With KLIPS and JPSC - the nationally representative panel data in each country -, we find that both Korean and Japanese women with more human capital and better employment status are likely to retain regular jobs. Japanese women’s employment, whether regular or non-regular, is positively affected by one’s cohort (the cohort effect), while negative by her spouse’s income level. On the contrary, the results of Korean women demonstrate no signs of such similarity as in Japan. Consequently, it indicates that women’s human capitals and job opportunities function as key mechanism determining their employment status in both countries.","PeriodicalId":84572,"journal":{"name":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","volume":"1 1","pages":"467-502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21588/DNS.2016.45.3.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

With female employment patterns and their ever-diverging degrees in Korea and Japan, this paper identifies which factors influence women’s labor supply around childbirth in each country, and draws cross-country analysis. It also aims to understand the different social context of each labor market, general attitudes towards female employment and work-life balance in two countries. With KLIPS and JPSC - the nationally representative panel data in each country -, we find that both Korean and Japanese women with more human capital and better employment status are likely to retain regular jobs. Japanese women’s employment, whether regular or non-regular, is positively affected by one’s cohort (the cohort effect), while negative by her spouse’s income level. On the contrary, the results of Korean women demonstrate no signs of such similarity as in Japan. Consequently, it indicates that women’s human capitals and job opportunities function as key mechanism determining their employment status in both countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国和日本女性就业的差异:是什么塑造了围绕生育的不同模式?
根据韩国和日本的女性就业模式及其不断分化的程度,本文确定了影响两国女性分娩前后劳动力供给的因素,并进行了跨国分析。它还旨在了解两个国家每个劳动力市场的不同社会背景,对女性就业和工作与生活平衡的普遍态度。通过KLIPS和JPSC——每个国家具有全国代表性的面板数据——我们发现,拥有更多人力资本和更好就业状况的韩国和日本女性都有可能保留常规工作。日本女性的就业,无论是正规的还是非正规的,都受到自己所在群体的积极影响(即群体效应),而受到配偶收入水平的消极影响。相反,韩国女性的调查结果却没有日本女性的相似之处。因此,这表明妇女的人力资本和就业机会是决定两国妇女就业地位的关键机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Explaining South Korea’s Diaspora Engagement Policies A Comparative Study on Two Ways of Community Building with Different Commons Ownership Modes: Focusing on the cases of Gasi-ri and Seonheul 1-ri Synergistic Interactions between Social Policy and SSEs in Developing Countries: Interfaces in Discourse and Practice * Labour protection policy in a third world economy: The case of Indonesia Arguments on Information Secrecy Made by Public Agencies in Indonesia: A Case Study in the Disputes over Access to Information, 2010-2016
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1