Some Suggestions from the U.S. Experience on How to Establish a Social Protection System with Chinese Characteristics

G. Chu, Dasong Deng
{"title":"Some Suggestions from the U.S. Experience on How to Establish a Social Protection System with Chinese Characteristics","authors":"G. Chu, Dasong Deng","doi":"10.1142/9789812812605_0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the Chinese social protection system within a broader framework. First, it points out some of the valuable U.S. experience. It then discusses policy implications that are relevant to the current reform in China. From the U.S. experience, ten suggestions are proposed on how to establish a social protection system with Chinese characteristics. Specially, this paper suggests that China (1) reform the social protection system gradually, (2) broaden and improve social assistance and welfare programs, (3) encourage the development of private insurance, (4) establish a social protection system with multiple layers, (5) determine insurance benefits based on basic needs, (6) ensure adequate funds for all social protection programs, (7) establish an income record system, (8) establish a poverty-line system, (9) establish a social protection trust fund commission, and (10) unify the management and administration of social protection programs. Introduction The social protection system of the United States has been evolving for many years. It has accumulated a vast amount of experience through path-breaking changes and reforms. Some of this experience is general and broad. Although it has emerged in the design of a social protection system of a developed country, it can be used to help formulate social protection policies for developing countries. Therefore, to the extent that the U.S. experience reflects basic principles of social protection, people in China should be able to learn from this in order to shorten the process of trial and error, and thus save a tremendous amount of time and money. In so doing, we should not ignore the differences in each country s social, political, and cultural backgrounds. We need to examine the development of the U.S. social protection system and selectively recommend those elements that are relevant to the special conditions existing in China. There is a growing literature on the subject of social security reform in China (Deng et al., 1997; Hussain, 1994; Liu, 1991; Liu et al., 1994; Song et al., 1998; World Bank, 1997). However, most previous articles have focused on pension system and health-care reforms. Little has been done in other social protection areas such as social assistance, welfare programs, and private insurance. In this paper, we examine Chinese social protection within a broader framework. First, we point out some of the valuable U.S. experience that can help develop a better Chinese social protection system. We then discuss policy implications that are relevant to the current reform in China. From the U.S. experience, we propose ten suggestions on how to establish a social protection system with Chinese characteristics. Reform the Social Protection System Gradually The U.S. social protection system has evolved gradually over decades. Although politics was involved in the system development and expenditures on some programs at times exerted pressure on government fiscal imbalances, the system has not suffered serious consequences as in many other western countries. This is because the introduction of different types of benefits and the determination of benefit payments in the U.S. have been based on the actual economic status of the country. When the Social Security Act was first promulgated in 1935, for example, retirement benefits were limited to the worker himself/herself. In 1939, the Congress made the Old-Age Insurance system a family program when it added benefits for dependents of retired workers and surviving dependents of deceased workers. Benefits to husbands, wives, and widowers of 65 and over were started in 1950. The scope of the basic national social insurance system was significantly broadened in 1956 through the addition of Disability Insurance. Benefits were provided for severely disabled workers aged 50 or older and for adult disabled children of deceased or retired workers. Benefits to dependents of disabled workers were added in 1958. …","PeriodicalId":30779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business Economic Development","volume":"44 1","pages":"398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business Economic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812812605_0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the Chinese social protection system within a broader framework. First, it points out some of the valuable U.S. experience. It then discusses policy implications that are relevant to the current reform in China. From the U.S. experience, ten suggestions are proposed on how to establish a social protection system with Chinese characteristics. Specially, this paper suggests that China (1) reform the social protection system gradually, (2) broaden and improve social assistance and welfare programs, (3) encourage the development of private insurance, (4) establish a social protection system with multiple layers, (5) determine insurance benefits based on basic needs, (6) ensure adequate funds for all social protection programs, (7) establish an income record system, (8) establish a poverty-line system, (9) establish a social protection trust fund commission, and (10) unify the management and administration of social protection programs. Introduction The social protection system of the United States has been evolving for many years. It has accumulated a vast amount of experience through path-breaking changes and reforms. Some of this experience is general and broad. Although it has emerged in the design of a social protection system of a developed country, it can be used to help formulate social protection policies for developing countries. Therefore, to the extent that the U.S. experience reflects basic principles of social protection, people in China should be able to learn from this in order to shorten the process of trial and error, and thus save a tremendous amount of time and money. In so doing, we should not ignore the differences in each country s social, political, and cultural backgrounds. We need to examine the development of the U.S. social protection system and selectively recommend those elements that are relevant to the special conditions existing in China. There is a growing literature on the subject of social security reform in China (Deng et al., 1997; Hussain, 1994; Liu, 1991; Liu et al., 1994; Song et al., 1998; World Bank, 1997). However, most previous articles have focused on pension system and health-care reforms. Little has been done in other social protection areas such as social assistance, welfare programs, and private insurance. In this paper, we examine Chinese social protection within a broader framework. First, we point out some of the valuable U.S. experience that can help develop a better Chinese social protection system. We then discuss policy implications that are relevant to the current reform in China. From the U.S. experience, we propose ten suggestions on how to establish a social protection system with Chinese characteristics. Reform the Social Protection System Gradually The U.S. social protection system has evolved gradually over decades. Although politics was involved in the system development and expenditures on some programs at times exerted pressure on government fiscal imbalances, the system has not suffered serious consequences as in many other western countries. This is because the introduction of different types of benefits and the determination of benefit payments in the U.S. have been based on the actual economic status of the country. When the Social Security Act was first promulgated in 1935, for example, retirement benefits were limited to the worker himself/herself. In 1939, the Congress made the Old-Age Insurance system a family program when it added benefits for dependents of retired workers and surviving dependents of deceased workers. Benefits to husbands, wives, and widowers of 65 and over were started in 1950. The scope of the basic national social insurance system was significantly broadened in 1956 through the addition of Disability Insurance. Benefits were provided for severely disabled workers aged 50 or older and for adult disabled children of deceased or retired workers. Benefits to dependents of disabled workers were added in 1958. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国经验对建立中国特色社会保障制度的几点建议
摘要本文在一个更广泛的框架内考察中国的社会保障制度。首先,它指出了美国的一些宝贵经验。然后讨论了与中国当前改革相关的政策含义。借鉴美国的经验,对如何建立具有中国特色的社会保障制度提出了十条建议。特别是,本文建议中国:(1)逐步改革社会保障制度,(2)扩大和完善社会救助和福利项目,(3)鼓励发展私营保险,(4)建立多层次的社会保障体系,(5)根据基本需要确定保险待遇,(6)确保所有社会保障项目有足够的资金,(7)建立收入记录制度,(8)建立贫困线制度,(4)建立社会保障制度。(九)成立社会保障信托基金委员会。(十)统一社会保障事业的管理和管理。美国的社会保障制度经历了多年的演变。它通过开创性的变革和改革积累了大量的经验。其中一些经验是普遍而广泛的。虽然它出现在发达国家的社会保护制度设计中,但它可以用来帮助发展中国家制定社会保护政策。因此,在某种程度上,美国的经验反映了社会保护的基本原则,中国人民应该能够从中学习,以缩短试验和错误的过程,从而节省大量的时间和金钱。在这样做的过程中,我们不能忽视每个国家的社会、政治、文化背景的差异。我们需要审视美国社会保障制度的发展,并有选择地推荐与中国存在的特殊情况相关的要素。关于中国社会保障改革的文献越来越多(Deng et al., 1997;侯赛因,1994;刘,1991;Liu et al., 1994;Song et al., 1998;世界银行,1997)。然而,之前的大多数文章都集中在养老金制度和医疗改革上。在其他社会保护领域,如社会救助、福利计划和私人保险方面,做得很少。在本文中,我们在一个更广泛的框架内考察中国的社会保护。首先,我们指出美国的一些宝贵经验可以帮助中国建立更好的社会保障制度。然后,我们讨论了与中国当前改革相关的政策含义。根据美国的经验,我们对如何建立具有中国特色的社会保障制度提出了十条建议。逐步改革社会保障制度美国的社会保障制度是经过几十年逐步演变的。尽管政治参与了制度的发展,一些项目的支出有时会对政府财政失衡造成压力,但该制度并没有像许多其他西方国家那样遭受严重后果。这是因为在美国,不同种类的福利的引入和福利支付的确定都是基于国家的实际经济状况。例如,1935年《社会保障法》首次颁布时,退休福利仅限于工人本人。1939年,国会将养老保险制度作为一项家庭计划,为退休工人的家属和已故工人的遗属增加了福利。对65岁及以上的丈夫、妻子和鳏夫的福利从1950年开始。1956年,全国基本社会保险制度的范围大大扩大,新增了残疾保险。向50岁或50岁以上的严重残疾工人和已故或退休工人的成年残疾子女提供福利。1958年增加了残疾工人家属的福利。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trimming the Retail: The investment outlook for CVS’s growth strategy Gender separation of entrepreneurship skills acquisition programmes for economic development A study on millennium development goals and sustainable development goals: Lesson from Bangladesh The environmental impact of renewable energy Addressing the detrimental impacts of COVID-19 on women in the workforce: Where do we go from here?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1