Deriving Permeability and Reservoir Rock Typing Supported with Self-Organized Maps SOM and Artificial Neural Networks ANN - Optimal Workflow for Enabling Core-Log Integration

L. Saputelli, R. Celma, D. Boyd, H. Shebl, J. Gomes, Fahmi Bahrini, Alvaro Escorcia, Yogendra Pandey
{"title":"Deriving Permeability and Reservoir Rock Typing Supported with Self-Organized Maps SOM and Artificial Neural Networks ANN - Optimal Workflow for Enabling Core-Log Integration","authors":"L. Saputelli, R. Celma, D. Boyd, H. Shebl, J. Gomes, Fahmi Bahrini, Alvaro Escorcia, Yogendra Pandey","doi":"10.2118/196704-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Permeability and rock typing are two of the main outputs generated from the petrophysical domain and are particularly contributors to the highest degree of uncertainty during the history matching process in reservoir modeling, with the subsequent high impact in field development decisions. Detailed core analysis is the preferred main source of information to estimate permeability and to assign rock types; however, since there are generally more un-cored than cored wells, logs are the most frequently applied source of information to predict permeability and rock types in each data point of the reservoir model.\n The approach of this investigation is to apply data analytics and machine learning to move from the core domain to the log domain and to determine relationships to then generate properties for the three-dimensional reservoir model with proper simulation for history matching. All wells have a full set of logs (Gamma Ray, Resistivity, Density and Neutron) and few have routine core analysis (Permeability, Porosity and MICP). On a first pass, logs from selected wells are classified into Self Organizing Maps (SOM) without analytical supervision. Then, core data is used to define petrophysical groups (PG), followed by linking the PG's to NMR pore-size distribution analysis results into pre-determined standard pore geometry groups, in this step supervised PGs are generated from the log response constrained by the relationship between pore-throat geometry (MICP) and pose-size distribution (NMR). Permeability-porosity core relationships are reviewed by sorting and eliminating the outliers or inconsistent samples (damaged or chipped, fractures or with local features). After that, the supervised PGs are used to train and calibrate a supervised neural network (NN) and permeability and rock type's relationships can be captured at log scale. Using dimensionality reduction improves the neural network relationships and thus data population into the petrophysical wells.\n The result is a more robust model capable to capture over 80% of the core relationships and able to predict permeability and rock types while preserving the geological features of the reservoir. The application of this method makes possible to determine the relevance of core and log data sources to address rock typing and permeability prediction uncertainties. The applied workflows also show how to break the autocorrelation of variables and maximize the usage of logs.\n This work demonstrates that the introduced data-driven methods are useful for rock typing determination and address several of the challenges related to core to log properties derivation.","PeriodicalId":11098,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196704-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Permeability and rock typing are two of the main outputs generated from the petrophysical domain and are particularly contributors to the highest degree of uncertainty during the history matching process in reservoir modeling, with the subsequent high impact in field development decisions. Detailed core analysis is the preferred main source of information to estimate permeability and to assign rock types; however, since there are generally more un-cored than cored wells, logs are the most frequently applied source of information to predict permeability and rock types in each data point of the reservoir model. The approach of this investigation is to apply data analytics and machine learning to move from the core domain to the log domain and to determine relationships to then generate properties for the three-dimensional reservoir model with proper simulation for history matching. All wells have a full set of logs (Gamma Ray, Resistivity, Density and Neutron) and few have routine core analysis (Permeability, Porosity and MICP). On a first pass, logs from selected wells are classified into Self Organizing Maps (SOM) without analytical supervision. Then, core data is used to define petrophysical groups (PG), followed by linking the PG's to NMR pore-size distribution analysis results into pre-determined standard pore geometry groups, in this step supervised PGs are generated from the log response constrained by the relationship between pore-throat geometry (MICP) and pose-size distribution (NMR). Permeability-porosity core relationships are reviewed by sorting and eliminating the outliers or inconsistent samples (damaged or chipped, fractures or with local features). After that, the supervised PGs are used to train and calibrate a supervised neural network (NN) and permeability and rock type's relationships can be captured at log scale. Using dimensionality reduction improves the neural network relationships and thus data population into the petrophysical wells. The result is a more robust model capable to capture over 80% of the core relationships and able to predict permeability and rock types while preserving the geological features of the reservoir. The application of this method makes possible to determine the relevance of core and log data sources to address rock typing and permeability prediction uncertainties. The applied workflows also show how to break the autocorrelation of variables and maximize the usage of logs. This work demonstrates that the introduced data-driven methods are useful for rock typing determination and address several of the challenges related to core to log properties derivation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于自组织地图、SOM和人工神经网络的渗透率和储层岩石类型分析——实现岩心-测井整合的最佳工作流程
渗透率和岩石类型是岩石物理领域产生的两个主要结果,在油藏建模的历史匹配过程中,它们是造成最高程度不确定性的主要因素,随后对油田开发决策产生重大影响。岩心详细分析是估计渗透率和确定岩石类型的首选主要信息来源;然而,由于没有取心的井通常比取心的井多,因此测井是最常用的信息来源,用于预测储层模型中每个数据点的渗透率和岩石类型。这项研究的方法是应用数据分析和机器学习,从核心区域转移到对数区域,确定关系,然后为三维油藏模型生成属性,并进行适当的历史匹配模拟。所有井都有全套的测井资料(伽马射线、电阻率、密度和中子),很少有常规岩心分析(渗透率、孔隙度和MICP)。在第一次测试中,在没有分析监督的情况下,将选定井的测井数据分类到自组织图(SOM)中。然后,使用岩心数据定义岩石物理组(PG),然后将PG与核磁共振孔径分布分析结果联系起来,形成预先确定的标准孔隙几何组,在此步骤中,受孔喉几何形状(MICP)和位态尺寸分布(NMR)之间关系约束的测井响应生成有监督的PG。通过分类和消除异常值或不一致的样品(损坏或碎裂,裂缝或具有局部特征)来审查渗透率-孔隙度岩心关系。然后,使用监督pg来训练和校准监督神经网络(NN),从而可以在对数尺度上捕获渗透率与岩石类型的关系。使用降维方法可以改善神经网络关系,从而将数据填充到岩石物理井中。其结果是一个更强大的模型,能够捕获超过80%的岩心关系,并能够预测渗透率和岩石类型,同时保留储层的地质特征。该方法的应用可以确定岩心和测井数据源的相关性,以解决岩石类型和渗透率预测的不确定性。所应用的工作流还展示了如何打破变量的自相关性,并最大限度地利用日志。这项工作表明,引入的数据驱动方法对于确定岩石类型很有用,并解决了与岩心到测井性质推导相关的几个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamically Conditioned Modeling to Address Development Challenges in a Highly Complex Fractured Basement Reservoir, Yemen Rejuvenating a Depleted Reservoir by Capitalizing Existing Facilities for Secondary Recovery in a Brownfield: A Case Study in Offshore Field Giant Field Development Optimisation with the Consideration of Regional Voidage Replacement Ratio EOR Technologies and Applications Towards 70% Recovery Factor Aspiration in Giant Carbonate Middle East Reservoirs Pitfalls of 3D Saturation Modelling in the Middle East
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1