Effect of synbiotics on inflammatory markers and white blood cell count in COVID-19 patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Mahsa Khodadoostan, Majid Aghadavood Marnani, A. R. Moravejolahkami, G. Askari, Bijan Iraj
{"title":"Effect of synbiotics on inflammatory markers and white blood cell count in COVID-19 patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial","authors":"Mahsa Khodadoostan, Majid Aghadavood Marnani, A. R. Moravejolahkami, G. Askari, Bijan Iraj","doi":"10.1108/nfs-06-2022-0195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nToday, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) treatment is an evolving process, and synbiotic administration has been suggested as a new therapeutic strategy. This study aims to investigate the effect of synbiotic supplementation in COVID-19 patients.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this placebo-controlled trial, 80 patients were randomized to receive oral synbiotic capsule (containing fructooligosaccharide and seven bacterial strains; Lactobacillus (L) casei, L. rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium breve, L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, L. bulgaricus, each one 109 colony-forming units) or placebo for two months. Inflammatory markers (Interleukin-6 [IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) and white blood cell (WBC) count were evaluated at two timepoints (baseline, two months later). The measured variables were adjusted for confounders and analyzed by SPSS v21.0.\n\n\nFindings\nAll 80 enrolled patients completed the study. The study adherence was good (approximately 70%). The mean changes for IL-6 were not significant (Δ = −0.6 ± 10.4 pg/mL vs Δ = +11.2 ± 50.3 pg/mL, p > 0.05). There were no significant improvements for CRP, ESR and WBC.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAdministration of synbiotics for two months did not improve inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients.\n","PeriodicalId":12417,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-06-2022-0195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Today, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) treatment is an evolving process, and synbiotic administration has been suggested as a new therapeutic strategy. This study aims to investigate the effect of synbiotic supplementation in COVID-19 patients. Design/methodology/approach In this placebo-controlled trial, 80 patients were randomized to receive oral synbiotic capsule (containing fructooligosaccharide and seven bacterial strains; Lactobacillus (L) casei, L. rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium breve, L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, L. bulgaricus, each one 109 colony-forming units) or placebo for two months. Inflammatory markers (Interleukin-6 [IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) and white blood cell (WBC) count were evaluated at two timepoints (baseline, two months later). The measured variables were adjusted for confounders and analyzed by SPSS v21.0. Findings All 80 enrolled patients completed the study. The study adherence was good (approximately 70%). The mean changes for IL-6 were not significant (Δ = −0.6 ± 10.4 pg/mL vs Δ = +11.2 ± 50.3 pg/mL, p > 0.05). There were no significant improvements for CRP, ESR and WBC. Originality/value Administration of synbiotics for two months did not improve inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合成抗生素对COVID-19患者炎症标志物和白细胞计数的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验
目前,冠状病毒病-19 (COVID-19)的治疗是一个不断发展的过程,合成给药已被认为是一种新的治疗策略。本研究旨在探讨合成菌补充剂对COVID-19患者的影响。设计/方法学/方法在这项安慰剂对照试验中,80例患者随机接受口服合成胶囊(含低聚果糖和7种菌株;干酪乳杆菌(L),鼠李糖乳杆菌,嗜热链球菌,短双歧杆菌,嗜酸乳杆菌,长双歧杆菌,保加利亚乳杆菌,每种109菌落形成单位)或安慰剂两个月。在两个时间点(基线和两个月后)评估炎症标志物(白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和白细胞(WBC)计数。对测量变量进行混杂因素校正,并用SPSS v21.0进行分析。所有80名入组患者均完成了研究。研究依从性良好(约70%)。IL-6的平均变化无统计学意义(Δ =−0.6±10.4 pg/mL vs Δ = +11.2±50.3 pg/mL, p > 0.05)。CRP、ESR和WBC无明显改善。原创性/价值给药两个月并没有改善COVID-19患者的炎症标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the changes in product characteristics, total ascorbic acid, total flavonoid content, total polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of dried soursop fruit tea (Annona muricata L.) during product storage D‐tryptophan, an eco‐friendly natural, safe, and healthy compound with antimicrobial activity against food‐borne pathogens: A systematic review Patterns and determinants of aerated drinks consumption among adolescents in India: analysis of National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2021) data Effect of flaxseed intervention on iron overload and its complications in thalassemia major patients Impact of out-of-pocket medical expenditure after major illness in the family on food consumption of a household
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1