Historicising Australian Deportation of 'Suspect' and 'Undesirable' Migrant Communities

IF 1.8 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5204/ijcjsd.2740
Marinella Marmo, E. Smith, Andrekos Varnava
{"title":"Historicising Australian Deportation of 'Suspect' and 'Undesirable' Migrant Communities","authors":"Marinella Marmo, E. Smith, Andrekos Varnava","doi":"10.5204/ijcjsd.2740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall aim of the paper is to present evidence on the factors underpinning historical deportation cases, by exploring the reasons, explanations and patterns related to deportation in Australia. The purpose is to consider whether these historical factors are antecedent to current forms of deportation occurring in Australia, and to bring to the fore potential recurring patterns. Deportation is currently conceptualised by border criminologists as a punitive tool of discipline and control, within the realm of penal powers. Some of this work on the ‘deportation regime’ asserts that certain migrants, or groups of migrants, are undesirable: their identity, (not)belonging and punishment have become inherently intertwined, and their mobility has become politicised and criminalised. This article theorises that deportation has been used in Australia, now and in the past, to expel individuals who are viewed as detrimental to the ‘health’ of the host society. The ‘deportation categories’ demonstrate that migrants’ desirability has historically been a temporary condition, shifting over time in line with the state’s requirements. They also demonstrate the historical regime of criminalisation of undesirable others enacted through Australia’s border control regime.","PeriodicalId":51781,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The overall aim of the paper is to present evidence on the factors underpinning historical deportation cases, by exploring the reasons, explanations and patterns related to deportation in Australia. The purpose is to consider whether these historical factors are antecedent to current forms of deportation occurring in Australia, and to bring to the fore potential recurring patterns. Deportation is currently conceptualised by border criminologists as a punitive tool of discipline and control, within the realm of penal powers. Some of this work on the ‘deportation regime’ asserts that certain migrants, or groups of migrants, are undesirable: their identity, (not)belonging and punishment have become inherently intertwined, and their mobility has become politicised and criminalised. This article theorises that deportation has been used in Australia, now and in the past, to expel individuals who are viewed as detrimental to the ‘health’ of the host society. The ‘deportation categories’ demonstrate that migrants’ desirability has historically been a temporary condition, shifting over time in line with the state’s requirements. They also demonstrate the historical regime of criminalisation of undesirable others enacted through Australia’s border control regime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚驱逐“可疑”和“不受欢迎”移民社区的历史
本文的总体目标是通过探索与澳大利亚驱逐出境有关的原因、解释和模式,为支持历史驱逐案件的因素提供证据。其目的是考虑这些历史因素是否先于澳大利亚目前发生的各种形式的驱逐出境,并突出潜在的反复出现的模式。目前,边境犯罪学家将驱逐出境定义为刑罚权力范围内的纪律和控制的惩罚性工具。一些关于“驱逐制度”的工作声称,某些移民或移民群体是不受欢迎的:他们的身份,(不是)归属感和惩罚已经内在地交织在一起,他们的流动性已经变得政治化和犯罪化。这篇文章的理论是,驱逐出境在澳大利亚已经被使用,现在和过去,驱逐那些被认为对东道国社会的“健康”有害的个人。“驱逐类别”表明,移民的可取性在历史上一直是一个暂时的条件,随着时间的推移,随着国家的要求而变化。他们还展示了澳大利亚边境管制制度对不受欢迎的人定罪的历史制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bill McClanahan (2023) Visual Criminology. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press Counting and Accounting for Mental Health Related Deaths in England and Wales The Theoretical Contributions of Asian Criminology in Reconstructing Criminology Building a Panopticon Through Nodal Governance: Mass Surveillance and Plural Policing in China’s COVID-19 Lockdown Secondary Green Crime: Bangkok’s PM2.5 Pollution and Policy Corruption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1