Mortality salience and the Trolley Problem in Medical Students

G. Andrade, M. Redondo, D. Razdan
{"title":"Mortality salience and the Trolley Problem in Medical Students","authors":"G. Andrade, M. Redondo, D. Razdan","doi":"10.24913/rjap.20.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Terror Management Theory predicts that when subjects are exposed to mortality salience (i.e. they are reminded of their death), they develop higher levels of anxiety and have stronger holdings for their cultural worldviews. Mortality salience also makes subjects more cautious in many daily activities. These premises lead to the hypothesis that, under mortality salience, subjects are more deontological in their moral judgments. To test this hypothesis, medical students from a Caribbean school were presented with two classical versions of the Trolley Problem. Subjects were placed in two groups, on the basis of a computer random generator. One group was not exposed to mortality salience, the other group was. Results came out showing that being under mortality salience does not significantly increase the probability that subjects have a deontological approach to ethics.","PeriodicalId":36595,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24913/rjap.20.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Terror Management Theory predicts that when subjects are exposed to mortality salience (i.e. they are reminded of their death), they develop higher levels of anxiety and have stronger holdings for their cultural worldviews. Mortality salience also makes subjects more cautious in many daily activities. These premises lead to the hypothesis that, under mortality salience, subjects are more deontological in their moral judgments. To test this hypothesis, medical students from a Caribbean school were presented with two classical versions of the Trolley Problem. Subjects were placed in two groups, on the basis of a computer random generator. One group was not exposed to mortality salience, the other group was. Results came out showing that being under mortality salience does not significantly increase the probability that subjects have a deontological approach to ethics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生的死亡率显著性与电车问题
恐惧管理理论预测,当受试者暴露于死亡显著性(即他们被提醒自己的死亡)时,他们会产生更高程度的焦虑,并对自己的文化世界观有更强的把握。死亡率的显著性也使受试者在许多日常活动中更加谨慎。这些前提导致了这样一个假设,即在死亡率显著性下,受试者在道德判断中更倾向于义务论。为了验证这一假设,研究人员向加勒比海一所学校的医学生展示了两个经典版本的电车问题。根据计算机随机发生器,受试者被分为两组。一组没有接触到死亡率显著性,另一组有。结果显示,在死亡率显著性下,并没有显著增加受试者对伦理学采取义务论方法的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology Psychology-Applied Psychology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emotional labor strategies and counterproductive work behavior: A social exchange theory approach A Study on Birth Order and Sense of Overall Responsibility in Undergraduate Students of Lahore, Pakistan Moroccan version of the Social Connectedness and Social Assurance Scales Facing the unvaccinated: emotions, stereotypes, and the desire for punishment during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany Relationship between Instagram Users’ Information-Sharing Behavior and Nature Relatedness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1