Response of Group B Streptococcus to the Combination of Gold Nanoparticles-Erythromycin as a Nanoweapon

L. Fozouni, Prastoo Vaezi, A. Ahani Azari
{"title":"Response of Group B Streptococcus to the Combination of Gold Nanoparticles-Erythromycin as a Nanoweapon","authors":"L. Fozouni, Prastoo Vaezi, A. Ahani Azari","doi":"10.5812/IJI.113204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) causes a wide range of adverse effects in both mothers and infants during pregnancy and after delivery. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of erythromycin either alone or in combination with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on the clinical GBS isolated from pregnant women. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on 106 women aged 16 - 48 years. After identification of GBS strains by phenotypic and genotypic methods (PCR), erythromycin-resistant isolates were identified using the Kirby-Bauer test and broth microdilution method according to CLSI-2015 guidelines. The antibacterial properties and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of erythromycin (either alone or combined with AuNPs) were assessed by the agar well-diffusion and broth microdilution methods, respectively. Results: The frequency of GBS isolates was significantly high in the pregnant women aged less than 40 years (73.9%) (P = 0.0251), those with a history of abortion (60.9%) (P = 0.038), and residents of rural areas (60%) (P = 0.038). Moreover, 65.2% of the isolates were resistant to erythromycin. The MIC of AuNPs-erythromycin combination required to inhibit the growth of 50% of GBS isolates (MIC50 = 0.25 μg/mL) was significantly lower than the concentration of AuNP-erythromycin required to inhibit the growth of 90% of the isolates (MIC90 = 1 μg/mL) (P = 0.02), indicating a 16-fold lower dose than the values for erythromycin and AuNPs alone. In the agar well-diffusion method, the average diameter of the growth inhibition zone of AuNPs-erythromycin was 2.5-fold greater than that of free erythromycin (P = 0.037). Conclusions: The results showed that the combination of erythromycin with AuNPs increased the antibacterial effects of erythromycin against GBS isolates.","PeriodicalId":13989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infection","volume":"213 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/IJI.113204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) causes a wide range of adverse effects in both mothers and infants during pregnancy and after delivery. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of erythromycin either alone or in combination with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on the clinical GBS isolated from pregnant women. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on 106 women aged 16 - 48 years. After identification of GBS strains by phenotypic and genotypic methods (PCR), erythromycin-resistant isolates were identified using the Kirby-Bauer test and broth microdilution method according to CLSI-2015 guidelines. The antibacterial properties and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of erythromycin (either alone or combined with AuNPs) were assessed by the agar well-diffusion and broth microdilution methods, respectively. Results: The frequency of GBS isolates was significantly high in the pregnant women aged less than 40 years (73.9%) (P = 0.0251), those with a history of abortion (60.9%) (P = 0.038), and residents of rural areas (60%) (P = 0.038). Moreover, 65.2% of the isolates were resistant to erythromycin. The MIC of AuNPs-erythromycin combination required to inhibit the growth of 50% of GBS isolates (MIC50 = 0.25 μg/mL) was significantly lower than the concentration of AuNP-erythromycin required to inhibit the growth of 90% of the isolates (MIC90 = 1 μg/mL) (P = 0.02), indicating a 16-fold lower dose than the values for erythromycin and AuNPs alone. In the agar well-diffusion method, the average diameter of the growth inhibition zone of AuNPs-erythromycin was 2.5-fold greater than that of free erythromycin (P = 0.037). Conclusions: The results showed that the combination of erythromycin with AuNPs increased the antibacterial effects of erythromycin against GBS isolates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B族链球菌对纳米金颗粒-红霉素复合纳米武器的反应
背景:B群链球菌(GBS)在怀孕期间和分娩后对母亲和婴儿造成广泛的不良反应。目的:本研究旨在评价红霉素单独使用或与金纳米颗粒(AuNPs)联合使用对孕妇分离的临床GBS的影响。方法:对106名16 - 48岁的女性进行描述性横断面研究。采用表型和基因型方法(PCR)对GBS菌株进行鉴定后,根据CLSI-2015指南采用Kirby-Bauer试验和肉汤微量稀释法对红霉素耐药菌株进行鉴定。分别采用琼脂孔扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法测定红霉素单独或与AuNPs联合的抗菌性能和最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。结果:GBS在40岁以下孕妇(73.9%)、有流产史者(60.9%)和农村居民(60%)中感染率较高(P = 0.038)。65.2%的菌株对红霉素耐药。抑制50% GBS分离株(MIC50 = 0.25 μg/mL)生长所需的AuNPs-红霉素联合用药MIC (MIC50 = 0.25 μg/mL)显著低于抑制90% GBS分离株(MIC90 = 1 μg/mL)生长所需的aunp -红霉素浓度(P = 0.02),比红霉素和AuNPs单独用药低16倍。琼脂孔扩散法中,aunps -红霉素的生长抑制带平均直径是游离红霉素的2.5倍(P = 0.037)。结论:红霉素与AuNPs合用可增强红霉素对GBS分离株的抗菌作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Antibiotic Susceptibility, Carbapenemase and Metallobetalactamase-producing Strains of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from Hospitalized Patients in Zahedan During 2019 - 2022 Associations Between Blood Group and COVID-19 Mortality, Severity, and Length of Hospitalization Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Neonates with COVID-19 Computerized Tomography Scan Findings in Pediatric Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Urinary Tract Infections Among Patients with Recent Antibiotic Use: A Cross-sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1