Stereotypes Concerns and Discreet Existence of Differences between Men and Women in Risk-Aversion – a Replication Study

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI:10.31577/sp.2021.03.824
M. Adamus, Matúš Grežo, Katarína Dudeková
{"title":"Stereotypes Concerns and Discreet Existence of Differences between Men and Women in Risk-Aversion – a Replication Study","authors":"M. Adamus, Matúš Grežo, Katarína Dudeková","doi":"10.31577/sp.2021.03.824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research conceptually replicates and extends the results of a study on the relation between individuals’ sex, their risk attitudes and stereotype threat (Carr & Steele, 2010). The authors reported that differences between men and women in risk aversion emerged only after activating negative stereotypes about women’s performance in mathematics. A total of 321 Slovaks, randomly assigned to control or experimental treatments, answered questions on their risk aversion, anxiety, analytical reasoning and gender self-concept. We expected to observe differences between men and women only after activating stereotypes. Aware of the issues with the consistency of different risk aversion measures, we investigated whether the effect of stereotype threat on risk aversion differs across three different risk aversion measures. Additionally, we explored whether this effect depends on how the stereotype threat is activated (explicit vs. implicit activation). Finally, to explain the mechanism through which stereotypes foster women’s risk aversion, we explored the moderating effect of gender self-concept and mediating effects of anxiety and analytical reasoning on the relationship between stereotype threat and risk aversion. In general, the study found no differences between men and women in risk aversion and did not replicate the original effect of stereotype threat on risk aversion.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2021.03.824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present research conceptually replicates and extends the results of a study on the relation between individuals’ sex, their risk attitudes and stereotype threat (Carr & Steele, 2010). The authors reported that differences between men and women in risk aversion emerged only after activating negative stereotypes about women’s performance in mathematics. A total of 321 Slovaks, randomly assigned to control or experimental treatments, answered questions on their risk aversion, anxiety, analytical reasoning and gender self-concept. We expected to observe differences between men and women only after activating stereotypes. Aware of the issues with the consistency of different risk aversion measures, we investigated whether the effect of stereotype threat on risk aversion differs across three different risk aversion measures. Additionally, we explored whether this effect depends on how the stereotype threat is activated (explicit vs. implicit activation). Finally, to explain the mechanism through which stereotypes foster women’s risk aversion, we explored the moderating effect of gender self-concept and mediating effects of anxiety and analytical reasoning on the relationship between stereotype threat and risk aversion. In general, the study found no differences between men and women in risk aversion and did not replicate the original effect of stereotype threat on risk aversion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性和女性在风险厌恶中的刻板印象关注和谨慎存在——一项重复研究
本研究在概念上复制并扩展了一项关于个体性别、风险态度和刻板印象威胁之间关系的研究结果(Carr & Steele, 2010)。作者报告说,只有在激活了对女性数学表现的负面刻板印象后,男性和女性在风险厌恶方面的差异才会出现。共有321名斯洛伐克人被随机分配到对照或实验治疗组,他们回答了有关风险厌恶、焦虑、分析推理和性别自我概念的问题。我们期望只有在激活刻板印象后才能观察到男女之间的差异。考虑到不同风险厌恶措施的一致性问题,我们研究了刻板印象威胁对风险厌恶的影响在三种不同的风险厌恶措施之间是否存在差异。此外,我们还探讨了这种效应是否取决于刻板印象威胁的激活方式(外显激活与内隐激活)。最后,为了解释刻板印象对女性风险厌恶的影响机制,我们探讨了性别自我概念的调节作用以及焦虑和分析推理在刻板印象威胁与风险厌恶关系中的中介作用。总的来说,研究发现男性和女性在风险厌恶方面没有差异,也没有复制刻板印象威胁对风险厌恶的原始影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Psychologica
Studia Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal Studia Psychologica is published by the Institute of Experimental Psychology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, since 1956. The journal publishes original articles in the area of psychology of cognitive processes in personality and social context. The journal aims at providing contributions to the understanding of cognitive processes which are used in the everyday functioning of human beings. This includes studies on the acquisition and use of knowledge about the world by human beings, the nature of such knowledge, and the relationship between knowledge, behavior and personality conceived as an agent in his/her environment.
期刊最新文献
Correlation of Cognitive and Linguistic Factors with Spoken Language Comprehension in Early Elementary Students Perceived Stress, COVID-19 Stressors, Loneliness, and Resilience of University Students after the Strictest Lockdown Body Appreciation, Self-Compassion, and Sexual Self-Consciousness in Women: The Example of Turkey and Azerbaijan Unlocking the Power of Self-Compassion and Psychological Flexibility: Enhancing Emotional Health, Subjective Wellbeing, and Quality of Life in College Students Unlocking the Power of Parenting: Unraveling How Family Atmosphere and Parenting Styles Impact the Pivotal Role in Bullying Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1