{"title":"Probabilismo y esclavitud negra","authors":"R. Pich","doi":"10.25185/8.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is known yet about the normative discussions on black slavery that were had by scholastic thinkers from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century. In this article, we connect the writings of Diego de Avendano S.J. (1594–1688) to the conceptual history of the slavery of black people. We highlight in particular the connection that Avendano promotes between the legitimacy of the slave trade, slave ownership and probabilism. This new perspective is acknowledged and criticized by Francisco Jose de Jaca O.F.M. Cap. (c. 1645–1689) and Epifanio de Moirans O.F.M. Cap. (1644–1689). The main purpose of the present essay is to describe and interpret the reactions of these two authors to Avendano’s discussion. Their anti-slavery works provide views on slavery in the ius gentium, freedom as a good and a right, and the insufficiency of moral probabilism as a doctrine when applied to the problem of the slavery of Africans.","PeriodicalId":52962,"journal":{"name":"Humanidades","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25185/8.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Little is known yet about the normative discussions on black slavery that were had by scholastic thinkers from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century. In this article, we connect the writings of Diego de Avendano S.J. (1594–1688) to the conceptual history of the slavery of black people. We highlight in particular the connection that Avendano promotes between the legitimacy of the slave trade, slave ownership and probabilism. This new perspective is acknowledged and criticized by Francisco Jose de Jaca O.F.M. Cap. (c. 1645–1689) and Epifanio de Moirans O.F.M. Cap. (1644–1689). The main purpose of the present essay is to describe and interpret the reactions of these two authors to Avendano’s discussion. Their anti-slavery works provide views on slavery in the ius gentium, freedom as a good and a right, and the insufficiency of moral probabilism as a doctrine when applied to the problem of the slavery of Africans.
从16世纪到18世纪,学者们对黑人奴隶制的规范性讨论知之甚少。在这篇文章中,我们将Diego de Avendano S.J.(1594-1688)的作品与黑人奴隶制的概念历史联系起来。我们特别强调了阿文达诺提出的奴隶贸易的合法性、奴隶所有权和可能性之间的联系。弗朗西斯科·何塞·德·雅卡(约1645-1689年)和埃皮法尼奥·德·莫伊兰斯(1644-1689年)承认并批评了这种新的观点。本文的主要目的是描述和解释这两位作者对Avendano的讨论的反应。他们的反奴隶制著作提供了对ius gentium中的奴隶制,自由作为一种善和权利的观点,以及道德概率论作为一种理论在应用于非洲奴隶问题时的不足。