Influence of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea in Southeastern of Ethiopia

R. Dargie, T. Meleta
{"title":"Influence of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea in Southeastern of Ethiopia","authors":"R. Dargie, T. Meleta","doi":"10.11648/J.AJLS.20210901.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experiment was conducted on research field of Sinana Agricultural Research center and Goro sub site in the highlands of Bale, south eastern Ethiopia under rain fed conditions during main cropping season of 2018 and 2019 to evaluate the integrated effects of pre-emergence (Dual gold 960 EC), post emergence (Gallant super) herbicides and hand weeding frequencies on yield and yield components of chick pea. The experiment consisted of eight weed management options; sole dual gold 960 EC, dual gold 960 EC + one time hand weeding at two weeks after crop emergence, and dual gold 960 EC at four weeks after crop emergence, sole gallant super, gallant super and one time hand weeding, weedy check, one time hand weeding at two weeks after crop emergence and two times hand weeding at two and four weeks after crop emergence along with two varieties (Dhera and Habru) laid out in randomized complete block (RCBD) with three replications. Analysis of variance showed that a significant difference in number of branches per plant, biological yield (kg ha-1), and grain yield (kg ha-1) were observed on different herbicidal treatments and hand weeding at Sinana while at Goro significant effects of integrated weed management were observed on dry matter, plant height, biological yield, grain yield and harvest index. The remains parameters studied at both locations were no significant for the treatments studied. The highest net return obtained from the application of 1.5 lit ha-1 dual gold 960 EC integrated with hand weeding at four weeks after crop emergence while the highest net return at Goro was obtained from two times hand weeding at two and four weeks after crop emergence and hence can be recommended for the end users. Moreover, similar experiments should be carried out in different cold and warmer regions of chickpea potential areas of the zone to confirm the present findings.","PeriodicalId":7759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJLS.20210901.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The experiment was conducted on research field of Sinana Agricultural Research center and Goro sub site in the highlands of Bale, south eastern Ethiopia under rain fed conditions during main cropping season of 2018 and 2019 to evaluate the integrated effects of pre-emergence (Dual gold 960 EC), post emergence (Gallant super) herbicides and hand weeding frequencies on yield and yield components of chick pea. The experiment consisted of eight weed management options; sole dual gold 960 EC, dual gold 960 EC + one time hand weeding at two weeks after crop emergence, and dual gold 960 EC at four weeks after crop emergence, sole gallant super, gallant super and one time hand weeding, weedy check, one time hand weeding at two weeks after crop emergence and two times hand weeding at two and four weeks after crop emergence along with two varieties (Dhera and Habru) laid out in randomized complete block (RCBD) with three replications. Analysis of variance showed that a significant difference in number of branches per plant, biological yield (kg ha-1), and grain yield (kg ha-1) were observed on different herbicidal treatments and hand weeding at Sinana while at Goro significant effects of integrated weed management were observed on dry matter, plant height, biological yield, grain yield and harvest index. The remains parameters studied at both locations were no significant for the treatments studied. The highest net return obtained from the application of 1.5 lit ha-1 dual gold 960 EC integrated with hand weeding at four weeks after crop emergence while the highest net return at Goro was obtained from two times hand weeding at two and four weeks after crop emergence and hence can be recommended for the end users. Moreover, similar experiments should be carried out in different cold and warmer regions of chickpea potential areas of the zone to confirm the present findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚东南部综合杂草管理措施对鹰嘴豆产量及产量构成因素的影响
本试验于2018年和2019年主作季在埃塞俄比亚东南部贝尔高地Sinana农业研究中心研究田和Goro分站进行,在雨养条件下,评价出苗前(Dual gold 960 EC)、出苗后(Gallant super)除草剂和手除草频率对鹰嘴豆产量和产量构成因素的综合影响。实验包括8种杂草管理方案;唯一双重黄金960 EC,双金960 EC +一次手除草在两周后作物出现,和双金960 EC在作物出现后4周,唯一的超级,勇敢的超级有一次手除草,杂草丛生的检查,一次手除草在两周后作物出现和两次手除草作物出现在两个和四个星期后连同两个品种(Dhera和Habru)在随机块(RCBD)与三个复制完成。方差分析表明,Sinana不同除草处理和手除草对单株枝数、生物产量(kg ha-1)和籽粒产量(kg ha-1)均有显著差异,而在Goro,综合除草管理对干物质、株高、生物产量、籽粒产量和收获指数均有显著影响。在两个地点研究的遗骸参数对研究的处理没有显著意义。在作物出苗后4周,施用1.5 lit ha-1双金960 EC与手除草相结合获得最高净收益,而在Goro,在作物出苗后2周和4周进行两次手除草获得最高净收益,因此可以推荐给最终用户。此外,还应在该区鹰嘴豆势区的不同冷暖区域进行类似实验,以证实本研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epiphytic Dynamics of the Adaptations to the Changes of Habitats in Taï National Park Availing Technology Options for Small-Scale Farmers: The Case of Pre-Extension Demonstration of Improved Rice Technology at Ilu-Harar District of Western Oromia, Ethiopia Characterization of Indigenous Goat Mating Experiences and Production Performances in North Western and Western Zones of Tigray Region, Ethiopia The Tool-Dependent Behaviour, Environmental Element Changes, and Psychological Selection: The Origin of the Human Mind Prevalence of <i>Shistosoma haemotobuim</i> Infestation in Children Aged 4 to 15 Years in the Locality of Matta Barrage of Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1