Diagnostic accuracy of bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling using desmopressin or corticotropic- releasing hormone in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Majid Valizadeh, Amirhossein Ramezani Ahmadi, Amir Ebadinejad, Fatemeh Rahmani, Behnaz Abiri
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling using desmopressin or corticotropic- releasing hormone in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Majid Valizadeh, Amirhossein Ramezani Ahmadi, Amir Ebadinejad, Fatemeh Rahmani, Behnaz Abiri","doi":"10.1007/s11154-022-09723-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current gold standard diagnostic method for Cushing disease (CD) is bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) after corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation. Due to shortages of CRH, BIPSS has been performed with desmopressin (DDAVP) instead. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of BIPSS using DDAVP or CRH for the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome (CS). A literature review was done in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and google scholar databases to derive summary estimates of the overall diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of BIPSS using DDAVP or CRH in Cushing's syndrome. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) for differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome in the random-effects models, were computed. Overall, 11 different studies with a total of 612 participants, were eligible for the analysis. Five articles with data on BIPSS using DDAVP, 5 papers on BIPSS using CRH, and another one evaluated the results of stimulation using DDAVP, with or without CRH, for differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. The pooled (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of BIPSS using DDAVP, were 96% (91-98%) and 1.00 (0.00-1.00), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.95. The pooled (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of BIPSS using CRH, were 98% (92-99%) and 1.00 (0.00-1.00), respectively, and the area under the SROC curve was 0.98. The I<sup>2</sup> index (95% CI) was 0% (0-100%) for both BIPSS using DDAVP and using CRH. As a result, DDAVP stimulation is a safe, effective, less expensive, valuable and available alternative to CRH in the setting of BIPSS for all age groups of patients with CS. Registration code in PROSPERO: CRD42021292531.</p>","PeriodicalId":21105,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders","volume":"239 1","pages":"881-892"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-022-09723-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current gold standard diagnostic method for Cushing disease (CD) is bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) after corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation. Due to shortages of CRH, BIPSS has been performed with desmopressin (DDAVP) instead. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of BIPSS using DDAVP or CRH for the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome (CS). A literature review was done in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and google scholar databases to derive summary estimates of the overall diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of BIPSS using DDAVP or CRH in Cushing's syndrome. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) for differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome in the random-effects models, were computed. Overall, 11 different studies with a total of 612 participants, were eligible for the analysis. Five articles with data on BIPSS using DDAVP, 5 papers on BIPSS using CRH, and another one evaluated the results of stimulation using DDAVP, with or without CRH, for differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. The pooled (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of BIPSS using DDAVP, were 96% (91-98%) and 1.00 (0.00-1.00), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.95. The pooled (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of BIPSS using CRH, were 98% (92-99%) and 1.00 (0.00-1.00), respectively, and the area under the SROC curve was 0.98. The I2 index (95% CI) was 0% (0-100%) for both BIPSS using DDAVP and using CRH. As a result, DDAVP stimulation is a safe, effective, less expensive, valuable and available alternative to CRH in the setting of BIPSS for all age groups of patients with CS. Registration code in PROSPERO: CRD42021292531.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去氨加压素或促皮质释放激素对acth依赖性库欣综合征双侧下岩窦取样诊断的准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目前库欣病(CD)的金标准诊断方法是促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素(CRH)刺激后双侧岩下窦取样(BIPSS)。由于CRH的缺乏,BIPSS用去氨加压素(DDAVP)代替。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估BIPSS使用DDAVP或CRH鉴别诊断库欣综合征(CS)的准确性。在PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE和谷歌学者数据库中进行了文献综述,以得出使用DDAVP或CRH对库欣综合征进行BIPSS诊断的总体敏感性和准确性的总结估计。计算随机效应模型中库欣综合征鉴别诊断的综合敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比和总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)。总共有11项不同的研究,共有612名参与者,符合分析条件。有5篇文章采用DDAVP对BIPSS进行了数据分析,5篇文章采用CRH对BIPSS进行了数据分析,还有一篇文章评价了使用DDAVP刺激在有无CRH的情况下对库欣综合征的鉴别诊断效果。使用DDAVP诊断BIPSS的合并(95% CI)敏感性和特异性分别为96%(91-98%)和1.00(0.00-1.00)。SROC曲线下面积为0.95。CRH对BIPSS的合并(95% CI)敏感性和特异性分别为98%(92-99%)和1.00 (0.00-1.00),SROC曲线下面积为0.98。使用DDAVP和CRH的BIPSS的I2指数(95% CI)为0%(0-100%)。因此,对于所有年龄段的CS患者,DDAVP刺激是一种安全、有效、廉价、有价值和可用的替代CRH的BIPSS治疗方法。普洛斯彼罗注册码:CRD42021292531。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of tissue oxygenation in obesity-related cardiometabolic complications Effects of long-term treatment with recombinant growth hormone on growth outcome in children born small for gestational age: a systematic review Iron homeostasis and insulin sensitivity: unraveling the complex interactions Isolated hypoprolactinemia: The rarest of the rare? Acquired hypoprolactinemia in men, possible phenotype
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1