Association between social network sites use and mental illness: A meta-analysis

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace Pub Date : 2022-02-02 DOI:10.5817/cp2022-1-1
Qinghua Yang, Jiangmeng Liu, J. Rui
{"title":"Association between social network sites use and mental illness: A meta-analysis","authors":"Qinghua Yang, Jiangmeng Liu, J. Rui","doi":"10.5817/cp2022-1-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing literature shows mixed results of how the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is related to mental health. Some studies provided evidence that SNS users are more mentally healthy because of the exchanged social support, while others argued that users tend to engage in upward social comparison, which would result in mental illness. To shed light on this relationship, we conducted a meta-analytic review to examine a) the association between SNS use and mental illness and b) the factors that moderate the association. A total of 1,451 studies were retrieved from six databases (i.e., Communication & Mass Media Complete, PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, PubMed, and Medline), among which 37 empirical studies (N = 84,955) were eligible for meta-analysis based on the inclusion criteria (i.e., empirical and quantitative studies with human subjects, including sufficient statistical information for effect size computation, concerned with SNS use and mental illness). Results showed that SNS use is associated with not only the likelihood of experiencing overall mental illness (r = .11) but also specific illness, including depression (r = .10), suicidal ideation (r = .22), schizophrenia/mania (r = .09), and ADHD/hyperactivity (r = .27). In addition, the intensity of SNS use, continuous measurement (vs. categorical), and participants’ health condition were found as positive moderators, whereas adopting social support as the theoretical framework and the proportion of African American participants as negative moderators of the association between SNS use and mental illness. Implications of the current study were discussed.","PeriodicalId":46651,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2022-1-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The existing literature shows mixed results of how the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is related to mental health. Some studies provided evidence that SNS users are more mentally healthy because of the exchanged social support, while others argued that users tend to engage in upward social comparison, which would result in mental illness. To shed light on this relationship, we conducted a meta-analytic review to examine a) the association between SNS use and mental illness and b) the factors that moderate the association. A total of 1,451 studies were retrieved from six databases (i.e., Communication & Mass Media Complete, PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, PubMed, and Medline), among which 37 empirical studies (N = 84,955) were eligible for meta-analysis based on the inclusion criteria (i.e., empirical and quantitative studies with human subjects, including sufficient statistical information for effect size computation, concerned with SNS use and mental illness). Results showed that SNS use is associated with not only the likelihood of experiencing overall mental illness (r = .11) but also specific illness, including depression (r = .10), suicidal ideation (r = .22), schizophrenia/mania (r = .09), and ADHD/hyperactivity (r = .27). In addition, the intensity of SNS use, continuous measurement (vs. categorical), and participants’ health condition were found as positive moderators, whereas adopting social support as the theoretical framework and the proportion of African American participants as negative moderators of the association between SNS use and mental illness. Implications of the current study were discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交网站使用与精神疾病的关系:一项荟萃分析
现有的文献显示,使用社交网站(sns)与心理健康之间的关系好坏参半。一些研究证明,社交网络用户由于交换的社会支持而心理更健康,而另一些研究则认为,用户倾向于进行向上的社会比较,从而导致心理疾病。为了阐明这种关系,我们进行了一项荟萃分析综述,以检验a)社交网络使用与精神疾病之间的关联以及b)调节这种关联的因素。从6个数据库(Communication & Mass Media Complete、PsycINFO、Academic Search Complete、Web of Science、PubMed和Medline)中共检索到1451项研究,其中37项实证研究(N = 84,955)符合纳入标准(即涉及人类受试者的实证和定量研究,包括用于效应量计算的足够统计信息,涉及SNS使用和精神疾病)。结果显示,社交网络的使用不仅与经历整体精神疾病的可能性(r = 0.11)有关,而且与特定疾病有关,包括抑郁症(r = 0.10)、自杀意念(r = 0.22)、精神分裂症/躁狂(r = 0.09)和多动症/多动症(r = 0.27)。此外,社交网络使用强度、连续测量(相对于分类测量)和参与者的健康状况是社交网络使用与精神疾病之间关系的正向调节因子,而以社会支持为理论框架和非裔美国参与者的比例是社交网络使用与精神疾病之间关系的负向调节因子。讨论了本研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between preference for online social interaction and affective well-being via compulsive dating app use: The moderating role of algorithmic beliefs The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study Online pornography use and sexual satisfaction in association with relationship satisfaction among middle-aged and older people Facebook, social comparison and happiness: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1