Utility as Economic Meaning

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.3917/REDP.282.0225
Yves Meinard, J. Gharbi
{"title":"Utility as Economic Meaning","authors":"Yves Meinard, J. Gharbi","doi":"10.3917/REDP.282.0225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of utility has played a major role in the history of economic thought, and it is still pivotal in most contemporary economic studies. But what is the meaning of utility? Here we take advantage of the philosophical literature to develop a theoretically robust answer to this question. Based on an analysis of the very diverse philosophical understandings of ?meaning?, we introduce a general definition encompassing this diversity. According to this definition, any account of a given act that can be endorsed by the agent performing this act qualifies as a ?meaning?. We argue that the concept of utility qualifies as economic meaning. This idea has two aspects. First, at a general level, because the axioms of the theory of choice are, in essence, easily understandable, utility can, in general, be conceived as a meaning. Second, more specifically, this very idea allows to define a standard to adjudicate whether specific instances of utility representation qualify as meanings. The main theoretical implication is that, when a given utility modelling fulfils the requirements to qualify as a meaning, then the stipulation of the axioms of the theory of choice is justified. This implication translates into concrete recommendations for applied economics.","PeriodicalId":44798,"journal":{"name":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","volume":"29 1","pages":"225-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.282.0225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The concept of utility has played a major role in the history of economic thought, and it is still pivotal in most contemporary economic studies. But what is the meaning of utility? Here we take advantage of the philosophical literature to develop a theoretically robust answer to this question. Based on an analysis of the very diverse philosophical understandings of ?meaning?, we introduce a general definition encompassing this diversity. According to this definition, any account of a given act that can be endorsed by the agent performing this act qualifies as a ?meaning?. We argue that the concept of utility qualifies as economic meaning. This idea has two aspects. First, at a general level, because the axioms of the theory of choice are, in essence, easily understandable, utility can, in general, be conceived as a meaning. Second, more specifically, this very idea allows to define a standard to adjudicate whether specific instances of utility representation qualify as meanings. The main theoretical implication is that, when a given utility modelling fulfils the requirements to qualify as a meaning, then the stipulation of the axioms of the theory of choice is justified. This implication translates into concrete recommendations for applied economics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效用作为经济意义
效用概念在经济思想史上发挥了重要作用,在大多数当代经济研究中仍然是关键的。但是效用的意义是什么呢?在这里,我们利用哲学文献对这个问题提出一个理论上可靠的答案。基于对意义的不同哲学理解的分析。,我们将介绍一个包含这种多样性的一般定义。根据这一定义,对某一特定行为的任何描述,只要能得到实施该行为的行为人的认可,就有资格成为一种“意义”。我们认为效用的概念符合经济意义。这个想法有两个方面。首先,在一般层面上,因为选择理论的公理本质上很容易理解,所以效用通常可以被理解为一种意义。其次,更具体地说,这个想法允许定义一个标准来判断特定的效用表示实例是否符合意义。主要的理论含义是,当给定的效用模型满足了作为一种意义的要求时,那么选择理论公理的规定是合理的。这一含义转化为应用经济学的具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Monetary Policy with Weakened Unions American Protectionism On the Historical Foundation of Women’s Self-Employment in Africa Testing for the Imports-Led Growth and the Growth-Led Imports Hypotheses in Panels for the Small Island World Mehrdad Vahabi, Destructive Coordination, Anfal and Islamic Political Capitalism. New Reading of Contemporary Iran , Palgrave-Macmillan, 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1