Reliability-based calibration for punching shear reduction factor for FRP reinforced slabs

Aroob Al-Ateyat, Omar M. Mostafa, Emran Alotaibi, Samer M. Barakat
{"title":"Reliability-based calibration for punching shear reduction factor for FRP reinforced slabs","authors":"Aroob Al-Ateyat, Omar M. Mostafa, Emran Alotaibi, Samer M. Barakat","doi":"10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Punching shear capacity of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforced slabs (RC)is usually predicted using theoretical models obtained from design codes and standards. In the load and resistance factored design (LRFD) approach, a reduction factor is applied to the member capacity as an implicit safety measure. The same reduction factors calibrated for conventional steel reinforced slabs are used for FRP reinforced slabs in design equations of existing codes. To accommodate for the specific properties and modes of failure of FRP slabs, a reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) with a specific target reliability index (βT) was conducted to calibrate the LRFD design approach reduction factors for punching shear resistance formulas available in ACI 440.1R-15, JSCE.b-1997 and CAN-CSA-S806-12 codes.The conducted analysis has shown that ACI 440.1R-15 provided a conservative estimate for FRP slabs capacity in punching shear. It was concluded that using any reduction factor up to a 3.5 reliability index (5x10-6, probability of failure) is unnecessary. On the other hand, estimation using JSCE.b-1997 and CAN-CSA-S806-12 was more accurate. The calibrated reduction factors for these codes were close to the ones provided. For the CAN-CSA-S806-12 code, the calculated reduction factor was 0.75 with βT=3 and 0.6 for βT=3.5. These values are close to the estimated by CAN/CSA-12, which was 0.65 with βT=3.1. The calculated reduction factor for the JSCE code equation was 0.8 with βT=3 and 0.7 with βT=3.5. A unified reduction factor of 0.7 is proposed to be used for CAN/CSA-12 and JSCE codes equations that satisfy a reliability index of more than 3 for both codes within the practical range of the applied loads.","PeriodicalId":6832,"journal":{"name":"2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET)","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Punching shear capacity of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforced slabs (RC)is usually predicted using theoretical models obtained from design codes and standards. In the load and resistance factored design (LRFD) approach, a reduction factor is applied to the member capacity as an implicit safety measure. The same reduction factors calibrated for conventional steel reinforced slabs are used for FRP reinforced slabs in design equations of existing codes. To accommodate for the specific properties and modes of failure of FRP slabs, a reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) with a specific target reliability index (βT) was conducted to calibrate the LRFD design approach reduction factors for punching shear resistance formulas available in ACI 440.1R-15, JSCE.b-1997 and CAN-CSA-S806-12 codes.The conducted analysis has shown that ACI 440.1R-15 provided a conservative estimate for FRP slabs capacity in punching shear. It was concluded that using any reduction factor up to a 3.5 reliability index (5x10-6, probability of failure) is unnecessary. On the other hand, estimation using JSCE.b-1997 and CAN-CSA-S806-12 was more accurate. The calibrated reduction factors for these codes were close to the ones provided. For the CAN-CSA-S806-12 code, the calculated reduction factor was 0.75 with βT=3 and 0.6 for βT=3.5. These values are close to the estimated by CAN/CSA-12, which was 0.65 with βT=3.1. The calculated reduction factor for the JSCE code equation was 0.8 with βT=3 and 0.7 with βT=3.5. A unified reduction factor of 0.7 is proposed to be used for CAN/CSA-12 and JSCE codes equations that satisfy a reliability index of more than 3 for both codes within the practical range of the applied loads.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FRP筋板冲孔剪切折减系数的可靠性标定
纤维增强聚合物(FRP)加筋板(RC)的冲剪承载力通常采用从设计规范和标准中获得的理论模型进行预测。在荷载和阻力因子设计(LRFD)方法中,将构件容量的减小系数作为一种隐含的安全措施。在现有规范的设计方程中,FRP筋板的折减系数与传统钢筋板的折减系数相同。为了适应FRP板的特定特性和破坏模式,使用蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)进行了具有特定目标可靠性指标(βT)的可靠性分析,以校准ACI 440.1R-15, JSCE中可用的冲孔抗剪公式的LRFD设计方法折减系数。b-1997和CAN-CSA-S806-12代码。分析表明,ACI 440.1R-15为FRP板冲剪承载力提供了保守估计。得出的结论是,使用任何降低因子高达3.5的可靠性指数(5 × 10-6,故障概率)是不必要的。另一方面,使用JSCE进行估计。b-1997和CAN-CSA-S806-12更为准确。这些规范的校正后的折减系数与所提供的折减系数相近。对于CAN-CSA-S806-12编码,当βT=3时计算出的缩减因子为0.75,当βT=3.5时计算出的缩减因子为0.6。这些值接近于CAN/CSA-12的估计值0.65,βT=3.1。当βT=3时,计算得到的JSCE代码方程的折减系数为0.8;当βT=3.5时,计算得到的折减系数为0.7。在实际荷载作用范围内,CAN/CSA-12和JSCE规范方程均满足3以上的可靠度指标时,建议采用统一的折减系数0.7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Numerical computing in engineering mathematics A Model for Solar Home System Assessment in Public Housing Projects in the United Arab Emirates A hybrid photovoltaic/solar chimney seawater desalination plant Comparative Study Investigating Compressed Natural Gas, Diesel, and Gasoline as Fuel for the Transportation Sector: A Case of UAE Impact of Urbanisation on Surface Temperature using Satellite and Ground Observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1