The Law of UK Trade with the EU and the World After Brexit

F. Fontanelli
{"title":"The Law of UK Trade with the EU and the World After Brexit","authors":"F. Fontanelli","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2023.2187615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the story of the legal impact that Brexit has had on UK’s trade with the rest of the world, including the European Union (EU). This article explains how the rules governing UK international trade flows (incoming and outgoing) have changed with the country’s exit from the EU and the subsequent conclusion of trade agreements with trade partners, most importantly the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) with the EU. Any attempt to tell this story is inevitably incomplete and selective, and so is this article. It offers to readers without advanced knowledge in matters of trade (and trade law) an entry-point to understand what has happened in this field, without the partisan takes that have saturated the public debate in the past decade, and with the benefit of some years of hindsight. I will sketch the two main scenarios in turn, to track the transformation of a changing landscape: (i) the pre-Brexit world, and (ii) the post-Brexit world (more specifically, the world emerging from the entry into effect of the TCA on 1 January 2021). The transition period and the ‘no deal’ scenario will not be discussed in-depth, but","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"65 1","pages":"3 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2023.2187615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This is the story of the legal impact that Brexit has had on UK’s trade with the rest of the world, including the European Union (EU). This article explains how the rules governing UK international trade flows (incoming and outgoing) have changed with the country’s exit from the EU and the subsequent conclusion of trade agreements with trade partners, most importantly the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) with the EU. Any attempt to tell this story is inevitably incomplete and selective, and so is this article. It offers to readers without advanced knowledge in matters of trade (and trade law) an entry-point to understand what has happened in this field, without the partisan takes that have saturated the public debate in the past decade, and with the benefit of some years of hindsight. I will sketch the two main scenarios in turn, to track the transformation of a changing landscape: (i) the pre-Brexit world, and (ii) the post-Brexit world (more specifically, the world emerging from the entry into effect of the TCA on 1 January 2021). The transition period and the ‘no deal’ scenario will not be discussed in-depth, but
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脱欧后英国与欧盟及世界贸易的法律
这是关于英国脱欧对英国与世界其他国家(包括欧盟)贸易的法律影响的故事。本文解释了随着英国退出欧盟以及随后与贸易伙伴达成贸易协定(最重要的是与欧盟的贸易与合作协定(TCA)),管理英国国际贸易流动(进出)的规则是如何发生变化的。任何讲述这个故事的尝试都不可避免地是不完整和选择性的,本文也是如此。它为没有贸易事务(和贸易法)高级知识的读者提供了一个切入点,让他们了解这个领域发生了什么,没有过去十年中充斥着公开辩论的党派观点,也没有几年的后见之明。我将依次概述两种主要情景,以跟踪不断变化的景观的转变:(I)英国脱欧前的世界,(ii)英国脱欧后的世界(更具体地说,是2021年1月1日TCA生效后的世界)。过渡期和“无协议脱欧”情况不会被深入讨论,但是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1