Quantitative Determinations of Phenobarbital and Carbamazepine in Serum by Nephelometric Immunoassay

H. Muro, T. Tatsuhara, K. Otsubo
{"title":"Quantitative Determinations of Phenobarbital and Carbamazepine in Serum by Nephelometric Immunoassay","authors":"H. Muro, T. Tatsuhara, K. Otsubo","doi":"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.19.464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An automated rate nephelometric assay (Beckman Array 360 System) for phenobarbital (PB) and carbamazepine (CBZ) was evaluated. The assay offers measuring ranges of 5-120μg/ml serum for PB and 2-40μg/ml for CBZ. The coefficients of variation for within-run and between-run precision for both PB and CBZ were< 5.0%. Test results were not significantly affected by bilirubin-unconjugated (up to 19.2 mg/ dl), bilirubin-conjugated (21.3 mg/dl), hemoglobin (540 mg/dl), turbidity (2070 units), or other antiepileptic drugs. The method produced satisfactory results in dilution tests. Quantitative results obtained by the Array 360 assay on serum samples from patients were compared with those obtained by the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) methods. The results correlated well with FPIA (r=0.996 and 0.981 for PB and CBZ, respectively) and EMIT (r=0.994 and 0.983). The Array 360 assay was concluded to be an appropriate and quick method for PB and CBZ determination.","PeriodicalId":17399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Nippon Hospital Pharmacists Association","volume":"21 1","pages":"464-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Nippon Hospital Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.19.464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An automated rate nephelometric assay (Beckman Array 360 System) for phenobarbital (PB) and carbamazepine (CBZ) was evaluated. The assay offers measuring ranges of 5-120μg/ml serum for PB and 2-40μg/ml for CBZ. The coefficients of variation for within-run and between-run precision for both PB and CBZ were< 5.0%. Test results were not significantly affected by bilirubin-unconjugated (up to 19.2 mg/ dl), bilirubin-conjugated (21.3 mg/dl), hemoglobin (540 mg/dl), turbidity (2070 units), or other antiepileptic drugs. The method produced satisfactory results in dilution tests. Quantitative results obtained by the Array 360 assay on serum samples from patients were compared with those obtained by the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) methods. The results correlated well with FPIA (r=0.996 and 0.981 for PB and CBZ, respectively) and EMIT (r=0.994 and 0.983). The Array 360 assay was concluded to be an appropriate and quick method for PB and CBZ determination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浊度免疫分析法定量测定血清中苯巴比妥和卡马西平
采用贝克曼阵列360系统(Beckman Array 360 System)对苯巴比妥(PB)和卡马西平(CBZ)的自动速率比浊法进行了评价。测定范围PB为5 ~ 120μg/ml, CBZ为2 ~ 40μg/ml。PB和CBZ的运行内和运行间精度变异系数均< 5.0%。未结合胆红素(高达19.2 mg/dl)、结合胆红素(21.3 mg/dl)、血红蛋白(540 mg/dl)、浊度(2070单位)或其他抗癫痫药物对试验结果没有显著影响。该方法的稀释试验结果令人满意。将Array 360法与荧光偏振免疫法(FPIA)和均相酶免疫法(EMIT)对患者血清样品的定量结果进行比较。结果与PB和CBZ的FPIA (r分别为0.996和0.981)和EMIT (r分别为0.994和0.983)具有良好的相关性。结果表明,阵列360法是测定铅和CBZ的一种简便易行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Urate-Lowering Drugs Using a Prescription Database 球形吸着炭 (クレメジン原体) の胆汁酸吸着性 癌化学療法時の口内炎に対するプロスタンディン®軟膏・アルロイドG液混合製剤の有効性 Collaboration of Hospital Pharmacists with Pharmaceutical College on Evaluation of Generic Drugs : The Case of Dissolution Test of Sodium Loxoprofen Tablets A Case Report and Evaluation of Pirmenol Toxicity Appeared with Liver Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1