自畫像:《理蕃の友》中原住民菁英的自我形象及書

楊智景 楊智景
{"title":"自畫像:《理蕃の友》中原住民菁英的自我形象及書","authors":"楊智景 楊智景","doi":"10.53106/181856492023020029001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 日治時期殖民者施行的理蕃政策是基於對原住民族進行馴化而成立,它具有近似宗教性的使命感。政策和馴化過程,皆企圖抹除原住民族的傳統生活文化與思維,重新建構符合殖民統治需求的認同和自我詮釋。其結果將導致原住民族在潛移默化中接受殖民者對其自身的觀看和定義,甚而內化成原住民族的自身認同,這同時也是原住民族挪用殖民者建構的原住民族知識與形象而進行自民族再現的過程。本文藉由日治時期《理蕃 友》中原住民族菁英的文字敘事,觀察具有「國語」讀寫、理解能力的原住民族菁英在成為理蕃政策的代行者之餘,呈現的自我描繪及自民族詮釋,並嘗試將之與殖民話語進行對照,進而說明原住民的自民族再現與殊方觀看之間的落差。再者,本文並探討原住民族口傳傳統神話的文字再現,作為一種原住民族菁英宣示部落認同之策略的可能性。\n Colonizers aimed to cultivate the “barbaric” aborigines through an aboriginal policy, which resembled a religious mission of domestication. This mission was intended to tame the aborigines and involved a constant process of taming supported by a governing system. The goal was to infiltrate or even substitute the traditional culture and central thoughts of the aboriginal society.\nFurthermore, it aimed to reconstruct an ideal self-recognition that conformed to colonial dominion. As a result, the aborigines who embraced the colonizers’ perspectives underwent an inner transformation, eventually internalizing the colonizers’ point of view as their own self-identification. In light of these dynamics, tribal representation emerged when the aboriginal elites redirected the colonizers’ perspectives on aboriginal cognitions and figures.\nThis essay aims to closely examine the writing of aboriginal elites in The Ribann no tomo, analyzing their viewpoints on aborigines and tribal compositions. It then proceeds to further discuss how aboriginal scholars constructed their own understanding of tribes and their associated images.\n \n","PeriodicalId":31271,"journal":{"name":"Tai Wan Jiao Yu She Hui Xue Yan Jiu","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tai Wan Jiao Yu She Hui Xue Yan Jiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/181856492023020029001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

日治時期殖民者施行的理蕃政策是基於對原住民族進行馴化而成立,它具有近似宗教性的使命感。政策和馴化過程,皆企圖抹除原住民族的傳統生活文化與思維,重新建構符合殖民統治需求的認同和自我詮釋。其結果將導致原住民族在潛移默化中接受殖民者對其自身的觀看和定義,甚而內化成原住民族的自身認同,這同時也是原住民族挪用殖民者建構的原住民族知識與形象而進行自民族再現的過程。本文藉由日治時期《理蕃 友》中原住民族菁英的文字敘事,觀察具有「國語」讀寫、理解能力的原住民族菁英在成為理蕃政策的代行者之餘,呈現的自我描繪及自民族詮釋,並嘗試將之與殖民話語進行對照,進而說明原住民的自民族再現與殊方觀看之間的落差。再者,本文並探討原住民族口傳傳統神話的文字再現,作為一種原住民族菁英宣示部落認同之策略的可能性。  Colonizers aimed to cultivate the “barbaric” aborigines through an aboriginal policy, which resembled a religious mission of domestication. This mission was intended to tame the aborigines and involved a constant process of taming supported by a governing system. The goal was to infiltrate or even substitute the traditional culture and central thoughts of the aboriginal society. Furthermore, it aimed to reconstruct an ideal self-recognition that conformed to colonial dominion. As a result, the aborigines who embraced the colonizers’ perspectives underwent an inner transformation, eventually internalizing the colonizers’ point of view as their own self-identification. In light of these dynamics, tribal representation emerged when the aboriginal elites redirected the colonizers’ perspectives on aboriginal cognitions and figures. This essay aims to closely examine the writing of aboriginal elites in The Ribann no tomo, analyzing their viewpoints on aborigines and tribal compositions. It then proceeds to further discuss how aboriginal scholars constructed their own understanding of tribes and their associated images.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自畫像:《理蕃の友》中原住民菁英的自我形象及書
日治时期殖民者施行的理蕃政策是基于对原住民族进行驯化而成立,它具有近似宗教性的使命感。政策和驯化过程,皆企图抹除原住民族的传统生活文化与思维,重新建构符合殖民统治需求的认同和自我诠释。其结果将导致原住民族在潜移默化中接受殖民者对其自身的观看和定义,甚而内化成原住民族的自身认同,这同时也是原住民族挪用殖民者建构的原住民族知识与形象而进行自民族再现的过程。本文借由日治时期《理蕃 友》中原住民族菁英的文字叙事,观察具有「国语」读写、理解能力的原住民族菁英在成为理蕃政策的代行者之余,呈现的自我描绘及自民族诠释,并尝试将之与殖民话语进行对照,进而说明原住民的自民族再现与殊方观看之间的落差。再者,本文并探讨原住民族口传传统神话的文字再现,作为一种原住民族菁英宣示部落认同之策略的可能性。 Colonizers aimed to cultivate the “barbaric” aborigines through an aboriginal policy, which resembled a religious mission of domestication. This mission was intended to tame the aborigines and involved a constant process of taming supported by a governing system. The goal was to infiltrate or even substitute the traditional culture and central thoughts of the aboriginal society.Furthermore, it aimed to reconstruct an ideal self-recognition that conformed to colonial dominion. As a result, the aborigines who embraced the colonizers’ perspectives underwent an inner transformation, eventually internalizing the colonizers’ point of view as their own self-identification. In light of these dynamics, tribal representation emerged when the aboriginal elites redirected the colonizers’ perspectives on aboriginal cognitions and figures.This essay aims to closely examine the writing of aboriginal elites in The Ribann no tomo, analyzing their viewpoints on aborigines and tribal compositions. It then proceeds to further discuss how aboriginal scholars constructed their own understanding of tribes and their associated images.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of Yuan, He & Hu (2023): Pedagogical Grammar and Grammar Pedagogy in Chinese as a Second Language Review of Zhang & Zhang (2022): Introducing Chinese Linguistics: A handbook for Chinese language teachers and learners 照顧一位血液透析病人無望感之護理經驗 慢性腎臟病與牙周病之關聯性 運用共享決策照護一位末期腎病病人面對透析模式選擇之護理經驗
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1