Disciplined Parenting Professionalism: FEPL, Changing Patterns of Power, Assumed Politics in Family Education

Jiarui Bai
{"title":"Disciplined Parenting Professionalism: FEPL, Changing Patterns of Power, Assumed Politics in Family Education","authors":"Jiarui Bai","doi":"10.18178/ijlt.9.2.157-162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, parents are required to raise children following the law as new parenting professionalism in China. This article explores how the new Family Education Promotion Law (FEPL) creates new requirements for parents to cultivate future citizens by employing family educational science. It draws upon text and discourse analysis of bills of FEPL regarding educative parent performance law. Interweaving qualitative data with post-structural groundings, this article questions that it neglects the discussion about distinctions of educational knowledge in various family education contexts. Despite stipulation of responsibilities of parents and other guardians that underscores legality and authority of laws and regulations in order to create a suitable family education environment for children, its unexpected outcome is to include the ‘ideal’ parents and exclude others, based more on family educational science of child-rearing by neglecting the peculiar part of the culture and the produced discrimination to parents at the bottom. Moreover, we found that it produces a new decentralization trend and shifts the power among members in the education village.","PeriodicalId":93451,"journal":{"name":"International journal of learning and teaching","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of learning and teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.9.2.157-162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, parents are required to raise children following the law as new parenting professionalism in China. This article explores how the new Family Education Promotion Law (FEPL) creates new requirements for parents to cultivate future citizens by employing family educational science. It draws upon text and discourse analysis of bills of FEPL regarding educative parent performance law. Interweaving qualitative data with post-structural groundings, this article questions that it neglects the discussion about distinctions of educational knowledge in various family education contexts. Despite stipulation of responsibilities of parents and other guardians that underscores legality and authority of laws and regulations in order to create a suitable family education environment for children, its unexpected outcome is to include the ‘ideal’ parents and exclude others, based more on family educational science of child-rearing by neglecting the peculiar part of the culture and the produced discrimination to parents at the bottom. Moreover, we found that it produces a new decentralization trend and shifts the power among members in the education village.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教养专业:FEPL,权力模式的改变,家庭教育中的假设政治
目前,在中国,作为一种新的育儿专业,父母被要求依法抚养孩子。本文探讨新《家庭教育促进法》如何运用家庭教育科学对父母培养未来公民提出新的要求。本文借鉴了教育家长绩效法相关法案的文本和话语分析。本文将定性数据与后结构基础交织在一起,质疑它忽视了对不同家庭教育背景下教育知识差异的讨论。尽管为了给孩子创造一个合适的家庭教育环境,对父母和其他监护人的责任进行了规定,强调法律法规的合法性和权威性,但其意想不到的结果是将“理想”父母包括在内,将其他父母排除在外,更多地基于家庭教育的育儿科学,而忽视了文化的特殊性和对底层父母产生的歧视。此外,我们发现它产生了一种新的分散化趋势,并在教育村成员之间转移了权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clarity of read outline discussion evaluation models to improve students' communication skills Algerian dialect, a sine qua non to learning standard Arabic Perpetuating inclusive education amidst the affiliative leadership style: Challenges and potentials Comparing competitive team-based learning with other instructional methods and approaches Teachers’ perspectives on the implementation of the “No child left behind policy”: Basis for framework enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1