Self-Perceived Success in Mate Poaching: How A Couple’s Attractiveness And Relationship Duration Impact Men’s Short-term Poaching Intentions

James B. Moran, T. Wade
{"title":"Self-Perceived Success in Mate Poaching: How A Couple’s Attractiveness And Relationship Duration Impact Men’s Short-term Poaching Intentions","authors":"James B. Moran, T. Wade","doi":"10.22330/HE/34/026-040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigated how the effects of a discrepancy in the attractiveness of the members of a couple and how long the couple has been in the relationship effect poaching decisions. Heterosexual men (N = 222) saw a photo where the man was more attractive than the woman, both were equally attractive, or the woman was more attractive than the man. Accompanying the photos were three different descriptions regarding the couple's relationship duration (2 months, 4 years, or 8 years). Items were then presented regarding the attractiveness of the couple and poaching attempts. The 2-month couple, where the woman is more attractive than the man, was expected to be more likely to be selected for poaching of the woman. Also, attractiveness discrepancy and relationship duration main effects were expected where, in general, the couple where the woman is more attractive than the man would be more likely to be a mate poaching target, and long-duration couples, were expected to be less likely to be mate poaching targets. Results revealed that, contrary to prior survey research on mate poaching, when a couple is equal in attractiveness and when the woman is more attractive than the man, participants indicate they would have more success poaching the woman in the couple. Keywords: mate poaching, couple’s attractiveness, assortative mating, relationship duration, couple’s discrepancy.\u2028 __________________________________________________________ \u2029 Moran, J.B. & Wade, T.J. (2019). Self-Perceived Success in Mate Poaching: How A Couple's Attractiveness And Relationship Duration Impact Men’s Short-term Poaching Intentions. Human Ethology, 34, 26-40. https://doi.org/10.22330/he/ 34/026-040 submitted: 19.Sep. 2018; revised: 18.Dec. 2018; accepted: 25.Feb. 2019 Moran, J.B. & Wade, T.J. (2019): Self-Perceived Success in Mate Poaching Human Ethology, 34, 26-40","PeriodicalId":91082,"journal":{"name":"Human ethology bulletin","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human ethology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22330/HE/34/026-040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This research investigated how the effects of a discrepancy in the attractiveness of the members of a couple and how long the couple has been in the relationship effect poaching decisions. Heterosexual men (N = 222) saw a photo where the man was more attractive than the woman, both were equally attractive, or the woman was more attractive than the man. Accompanying the photos were three different descriptions regarding the couple's relationship duration (2 months, 4 years, or 8 years). Items were then presented regarding the attractiveness of the couple and poaching attempts. The 2-month couple, where the woman is more attractive than the man, was expected to be more likely to be selected for poaching of the woman. Also, attractiveness discrepancy and relationship duration main effects were expected where, in general, the couple where the woman is more attractive than the man would be more likely to be a mate poaching target, and long-duration couples, were expected to be less likely to be mate poaching targets. Results revealed that, contrary to prior survey research on mate poaching, when a couple is equal in attractiveness and when the woman is more attractive than the man, participants indicate they would have more success poaching the woman in the couple. Keywords: mate poaching, couple’s attractiveness, assortative mating, relationship duration, couple’s discrepancy.
 __________________________________________________________ 
 Moran, J.B. & Wade, T.J. (2019). Self-Perceived Success in Mate Poaching: How A Couple's Attractiveness And Relationship Duration Impact Men’s Short-term Poaching Intentions. Human Ethology, 34, 26-40. https://doi.org/10.22330/he/ 34/026-040 submitted: 19.Sep. 2018; revised: 18.Dec. 2018; accepted: 25.Feb. 2019 Moran, J.B. & Wade, T.J. (2019): Self-Perceived Success in Mate Poaching Human Ethology, 34, 26-40
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
配偶偷猎的自我感知成功:夫妻的吸引力和关系持续时间如何影响男性的短期偷猎意图
这项研究调查了一对夫妇在吸引力上的差异以及他们在一起的时间长短对挖角决定的影响。异性恋男性(N = 222)看到一张男性比女性更有魅力的照片,两个人都一样有魅力,或者女性比男性更有魅力。照片上附有三种不同的描述,描述了这对夫妇的关系持续时间(2个月、4年或8年)。然后展示了关于这对夫妇的吸引力和偷猎企图的项目。2个月的夫妻,女方比男方更有魅力,被认为更有可能被选中挖走女方。此外,吸引力差异和关系持续时间的主要影响是预期的,一般来说,女性比男性更有吸引力的夫妇更有可能成为配偶偷猎的目标,而长期关系的夫妇则不太可能成为配偶偷猎的目标。结果显示,与之前关于配偶偷猎的调查研究相反,当一对夫妇的吸引力相等,当女人比男人更有吸引力时,参与者表示他们更容易偷猎到这对夫妇中的女人。关键词:配偶偷猎,夫妻吸引力,选择性交配,关系持续时间,夫妻差异。
 __________________________________________________________ 
 Moran J.B. &韦德T.J.(2019)。配偶偷猎的自我感知成功:夫妻的吸引力和关系持续时间如何影响男性的短期偷猎意图。动物行为学,34,26-40。https://doi.org/10.22330/he/ 34/026-040提交日期:9月19日2018;修正:18. 12月。2018;接受:25. 2月。Moran, J.B. & Wade, T.J.(2019):配偶偷猎的自我感知成功人类行为学,34,26-40
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ISHE Travels to Amazon: A Narrative of a Special Issue Based on the XXII ISHE Conference, 5-9 August 2014 in Belém, Brazil The Ethologist’s Corner The Trouble With Certainty in the Study of Human Evolution Women at the “Sight” of Evolution A Lost Idea in Psychology: Observation as Starting Point for the Scientific Investigation of Human Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1