La responsabilité médico-légale des médecins des Samu et des Smur

C Gerson, C Bons Letouzey, C Sicot
{"title":"La responsabilité médico-légale des médecins des Samu et des Smur","authors":"C Gerson,&nbsp;C Bons Letouzey,&nbsp;C Sicot","doi":"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90060-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A study on the legal liability of physicians working for the SAMU and SMUR emergency medical services was carried out based on a retrospective assessment of all the accidents involving the intervention of medical staff, recorded between 1994 and 1999 by the Sou Médical. During this period, a total of 15 claims were made concerning physicians who acted either in a transporting capacity (ten claims) or in a regulatory capacity (five claims). In the majority of cases (12 out of 15 cases), the claim followed legal proceedings. In two other cases, it was submitted after a verbal or written complaint, in one case, it was spontaneously submitted by a physician following the accidental death of a patient during transport, without any complaint being made by the victim's family. The medico-legal repercussions of the 15 accidents reported in the study were only known in 11 cases, as in the remaining cases there were ongoing legal proceedings. None of the 11 cases involved conviction for any of the doctors concerned. In particular, the criminal lawsuits brought against three regulators and three transporters led to closure of the file (two instances) or to dismissal of the case (four instances). In contrast to the high ratio of criminal lawsuits initiated by the patients, in this series of 15 accidents the fact that no doctor was sentenced by the court reflects a degree of partiality on the part of the judges towards the doctors involved in emergency medical service activity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101063,"journal":{"name":"Réanimation Urgences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90060-4","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réanimation Urgences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164675600900604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A study on the legal liability of physicians working for the SAMU and SMUR emergency medical services was carried out based on a retrospective assessment of all the accidents involving the intervention of medical staff, recorded between 1994 and 1999 by the Sou Médical. During this period, a total of 15 claims were made concerning physicians who acted either in a transporting capacity (ten claims) or in a regulatory capacity (five claims). In the majority of cases (12 out of 15 cases), the claim followed legal proceedings. In two other cases, it was submitted after a verbal or written complaint, in one case, it was spontaneously submitted by a physician following the accidental death of a patient during transport, without any complaint being made by the victim's family. The medico-legal repercussions of the 15 accidents reported in the study were only known in 11 cases, as in the remaining cases there were ongoing legal proceedings. None of the 11 cases involved conviction for any of the doctors concerned. In particular, the criminal lawsuits brought against three regulators and three transporters led to closure of the file (two instances) or to dismissal of the case (four instances). In contrast to the high ratio of criminal lawsuits initiated by the patients, in this series of 15 accidents the fact that no doctor was sentenced by the court reflects a degree of partiality on the part of the judges towards the doctors involved in emergency medical service activity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Samu和Smur医生的医疗法律责任
在对1994年至1999年期间由Sou msamdical记录的涉及医务人员干预的所有事故进行回顾性评估的基础上,对在SAMU和SMUR紧急医疗服务部门工作的医生的法律责任进行了研究。在此期间,共有15项索赔涉及以运输能力(10项索赔)或以管理能力(5项索赔)行事的医生。在大多数情况下(15个案件中的12个),索赔是在法律程序之后提出的。在另外两起案件中,申诉是在口头或书面申诉后提出的;在一起案件中,一名医生在病人在运输过程中意外死亡后自发提出的,受害者家属没有提出任何申诉。研究报告中报告的15起事故的医疗法律影响仅在11起案件中已知,其余案件仍在进行法律诉讼。在这11宗个案中,没有任何医生被定罪。特别是,对3家监管机构和3家运输公司提起的刑事诉讼中,有2起案件被立案或4起案件被驳回。与病人提起刑事诉讼的比例较高相反,在这一系列15起事故中,法院没有对医生判刑,这一事实反映出法官对参与紧急医疗服务活动的医生有一定程度的偏袒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nutrition artificielle en réanimation ECMO Corticothérapie au cours du choc septique et du syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë Rôle des glucocorticoïdes dans la cascade inflammatoire Corticoïdes chez l'enfant dans le purpura fulminans et la dysplasie bronchopulmonaire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1