Survey on Changes in Neurophysiotherapy at a Hospital/Clinic and Home-Based Settings in India During COVID-19 Pandemic

Komal Bhanot, D. Gandhi, Mridul Makkar, Himani Khatter, J. Pandian
{"title":"Survey on Changes in Neurophysiotherapy at a Hospital/Clinic and Home-Based Settings in India During COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Komal Bhanot, D. Gandhi, Mridul Makkar, Himani Khatter, J. Pandian","doi":"10.1177/25166085231174687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background COVID-19 exposed the weakened healthcare sector and burdened the economic sector. Patients with neurological diseases require physical rehabilitation from the acute to chronic phase irrespective of their COVID positive status. Objective To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative changes in neurological physiotherapy at hospital/clinic and home-based settings in India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology Using an online survey, a cross-sectional observational study was implemented among physiotherapists in India who treated neurological patients amidst the pandemic at hospital/clinic and for home-based settings using an online survey. Convenience sampling was used for recruiting participants in the study. Results and Conclusion Most of the physiotherapists, whether working in hospitals or in patients’ homes, indicated a decline in the number of referrals and therapy sessions given to their patients. Both groups resorted to the use of various forms of telerehabilitation in delivering therapy. Even though there is evidence supporting the necessity of physiotherapy for respiratory care, most of the respondents did not put it into practice. No protocols/guidelines for therapy delivery were implemented or used by our sample of respondents. This paper highlights the needs under 3 main categories: (a) development and implementation of contextualized clinical-practice-guidelines and clinical-monitoring systems for neurological physiotherapy, (b) incorporating respiratory physiotherapy sessions supported by research to treat neurological cases in such pandemics, and (c) to modify policies both at public and private domains ensuring incorporation and implementation of physiotherapy for neurological conditions, and to raise campaigns that educate the public on the significance of receiving uninterrupted physiotherapy, even during similar pandemics.","PeriodicalId":93323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stroke medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stroke medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25166085231174687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background COVID-19 exposed the weakened healthcare sector and burdened the economic sector. Patients with neurological diseases require physical rehabilitation from the acute to chronic phase irrespective of their COVID positive status. Objective To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative changes in neurological physiotherapy at hospital/clinic and home-based settings in India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology Using an online survey, a cross-sectional observational study was implemented among physiotherapists in India who treated neurological patients amidst the pandemic at hospital/clinic and for home-based settings using an online survey. Convenience sampling was used for recruiting participants in the study. Results and Conclusion Most of the physiotherapists, whether working in hospitals or in patients’ homes, indicated a decline in the number of referrals and therapy sessions given to their patients. Both groups resorted to the use of various forms of telerehabilitation in delivering therapy. Even though there is evidence supporting the necessity of physiotherapy for respiratory care, most of the respondents did not put it into practice. No protocols/guidelines for therapy delivery were implemented or used by our sample of respondents. This paper highlights the needs under 3 main categories: (a) development and implementation of contextualized clinical-practice-guidelines and clinical-monitoring systems for neurological physiotherapy, (b) incorporating respiratory physiotherapy sessions supported by research to treat neurological cases in such pandemics, and (c) to modify policies both at public and private domains ensuring incorporation and implementation of physiotherapy for neurological conditions, and to raise campaigns that educate the public on the significance of receiving uninterrupted physiotherapy, even during similar pandemics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间印度医院/诊所和家庭环境中神经物理治疗变化的调查
新冠肺炎疫情暴露了脆弱的医疗保健行业,给经济部门带来了负担。神经系统疾病患者无论是否呈COVID阳性,都需要从急性期到慢性期的身体康复。目的评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间印度医院/诊所和家庭环境中神经物理治疗的定性和定量变化。通过在线调查,在印度的物理治疗师中实施了一项横断面观察性研究,这些物理治疗师在大流行期间在医院/诊所治疗神经系统患者,并在家庭环境中使用在线调查。本研究采用方便抽样方法招募参与者。结果和结论:无论是在医院还是在患者家中工作,大多数物理治疗师都表示,向患者提供的转诊和治疗次数有所减少。两组在提供治疗时都采用了各种形式的远程康复。尽管有证据支持物理治疗对呼吸系统护理的必要性,但大多数受访者并未付诸实践。我们的受访者样本没有实施或使用治疗递送的协议/指南。本文将需求分为三大类:(a)制定和实施神经物理治疗的情境化临床实践指南和临床监测系统,(b)纳入有研究支持的呼吸物理治疗课程,以治疗此类流行病中的神经病例,以及(c)修改公共和私人领域的政策,确保纳入和实施神经疾病的物理治疗。并开展宣传活动,教育公众即使在类似的大流行期间也要接受不间断的物理治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Correlation of Pulsatility Index by Transcranial Doppler in the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Cerebral Venous Sinus 
Thrombosis Acute Ischaemic Stroke in a Young Adult in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Report of Post-strangulation Carotid Artery Dissection The Effect of Biological Sex on a County Pre-hospital Stroke Initiative COVID and Vaccine-related Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Expert Consensus on Improving Stroke Care Ecosystem in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1