Assessment of peer-conceptualised, written and led single-session group interventions for carers supporting a person with borderline personality disorder

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Advances in Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1080/18387357.2021.2020139
R. Brown, P. Heidari, Kaitlyn Taylor, Joan Veltkamp, J. Broadbear, S. Rao
{"title":"Assessment of peer-conceptualised, written and led single-session group interventions for carers supporting a person with borderline personality disorder","authors":"R. Brown, P. Heidari, Kaitlyn Taylor, Joan Veltkamp, J. Broadbear, S. Rao","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2021.2020139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective No research to date has investigated the utility of a single session peer-informed and peer-led intervention for carers of people with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Two single session format group interventions – a 2.5-hour information session and an all-day (7-hour) workshop – were conceptualised, written, and facilitated by a carer peer with the assistance of a clinician experienced in supporting people with BPD. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Method Participants completed the Burden Assessment Scale (BAS), Kessler-10 (K10) and the BPD attitude and knowledge survey (e-KALM) before and after the intervention as well as a set of questions seeking participants’ thoughts about the usefulness of the content of the intervention and their overall satisfaction. Results 225 carers who attended the 7-hour workshop and 100 carers who completed the 2.5-hour information session completed the pre-intervention survey. The carer participants’ e-KALM scores improved significantly following interventions. Following the 7-hour workshop, K10 (p < 0.05) and BAS (p < 0.001) scores had a statistically significant improvement. Participants from both interventions reported that they appreciated the opportunity to be heard and supported and were very satisfied overall with the format and content. Discussion Both single session carer intervention formats resulted in meaningful improvements in participants’ knowledge about and attitudes towards BPD. The full-day workshop also reduced the perceived burden associated with care-giving; highlighting the community need for longer-term carer support.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"229 1","pages":"134 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2021.2020139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective No research to date has investigated the utility of a single session peer-informed and peer-led intervention for carers of people with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Two single session format group interventions – a 2.5-hour information session and an all-day (7-hour) workshop – were conceptualised, written, and facilitated by a carer peer with the assistance of a clinician experienced in supporting people with BPD. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Method Participants completed the Burden Assessment Scale (BAS), Kessler-10 (K10) and the BPD attitude and knowledge survey (e-KALM) before and after the intervention as well as a set of questions seeking participants’ thoughts about the usefulness of the content of the intervention and their overall satisfaction. Results 225 carers who attended the 7-hour workshop and 100 carers who completed the 2.5-hour information session completed the pre-intervention survey. The carer participants’ e-KALM scores improved significantly following interventions. Following the 7-hour workshop, K10 (p < 0.05) and BAS (p < 0.001) scores had a statistically significant improvement. Participants from both interventions reported that they appreciated the opportunity to be heard and supported and were very satisfied overall with the format and content. Discussion Both single session carer intervention formats resulted in meaningful improvements in participants’ knowledge about and attitudes towards BPD. The full-day workshop also reduced the perceived burden associated with care-giving; highlighting the community need for longer-term carer support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对支持边缘型人格障碍患者的护理人员进行同伴概念化、书面和牵头的单次小组干预的评估
【摘要】目的迄今为止,还没有研究调查了单次同伴告知和同伴领导的干预对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者护理人员的效用。两个单一会议形式的小组干预-一个2.5小时的信息会议和一个全天(7小时)的研讨会-由护理同伴在支持BPD患者的经验丰富的临床医生的帮助下概念化,编写和促进。本研究旨在评估这些干预措施的有效性。方法参与者在干预前后分别完成负担评定量表(BAS)、Kessler-10量表(K10)和BPD态度与知识调查问卷(e-KALM),并对干预内容的有用性和总体满意度进行问卷调查。结果225名参加了7小时工作坊的护理人员和100名参加了2.5小时咨询会的护理人员完成了干预前调查。护理参与者的e-KALM得分在干预后显著提高。7小时研修后,K10 (p < 0.05)和BAS (p < 0.001)评分均有统计学意义的改善。两种干预措施的参与者报告说,他们感谢有机会表达意见和得到支持,对形式和内容总体上非常满意。两种单次护理干预形式均显著改善了被试对BPD的认识和态度。全天的讲习班也减轻了与照顾有关的感知负担;强调社区对长期照顾者支援的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Patients’ and staff’s experiences of Well-Track physical activity and sleep quality intervention in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service Assessment of the implementation of psychological first aid training: adaptation and validation of determinants of the implementation behavior questionnaire Investigating factors that impact on the uptake of Mental Health First Aid Australia’s Conversations About Gambling course: a qualitative study engaging stakeholder perspectives The relationship between mental health and stress: the moderating role of satisfaction with friendships Mental Health First Aid training for China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1