Person-centered planning in mental health: A transatlantic collaboration to tackle implementation barriers.

Emma Miller, Victoria Stanhope, Maria Restrepo-Toro, Janis Tondora
{"title":"Person-centered planning in mental health: A transatlantic collaboration to tackle implementation barriers.","authors":"Emma Miller, Victoria Stanhope, Maria Restrepo-Toro, Janis Tondora","doi":"10.1080/15487768.2017.1338045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collaborative, person-centered approaches to care planning are increasingly recognized as instrumental in supporting attainment of personal recovery outcomes. Yet, though much is known about factors that support person-centered planning, successful implementation often remains an elusive goal. This article reviews international efforts to promote person-centered care planning (PCCP) in the context of a randomized clinical trial in the United States and in the Meaningful and Measurable initiative, a collaborative action research project involving diverse provider organizations in Scotland. The authors review the history of international efforts to implement PCCP and offer preliminary evidence regarding its positive impact on both process outcomes (e.g., the nature of the primary therapeutic relationship and the service-user's experience) and personal recovery outcomes (e.g., quality of life, community belonging, and valued roles). PCCP will be defined through descriptions of key principles and practices as they relate to both relational aspects (e.g., shifts in stakeholder roles and conversations) and documentation/recording aspects (e.g., how person-centered relationships are captured in written or electronic records). Similarities and differences between the United States and Scottish experiences of PCCP are highlighted and a series of recommendations offered to further implementation of this essential recovery-oriented practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72174,"journal":{"name":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2017.1338045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative, person-centered approaches to care planning are increasingly recognized as instrumental in supporting attainment of personal recovery outcomes. Yet, though much is known about factors that support person-centered planning, successful implementation often remains an elusive goal. This article reviews international efforts to promote person-centered care planning (PCCP) in the context of a randomized clinical trial in the United States and in the Meaningful and Measurable initiative, a collaborative action research project involving diverse provider organizations in Scotland. The authors review the history of international efforts to implement PCCP and offer preliminary evidence regarding its positive impact on both process outcomes (e.g., the nature of the primary therapeutic relationship and the service-user's experience) and personal recovery outcomes (e.g., quality of life, community belonging, and valued roles). PCCP will be defined through descriptions of key principles and practices as they relate to both relational aspects (e.g., shifts in stakeholder roles and conversations) and documentation/recording aspects (e.g., how person-centered relationships are captured in written or electronic records). Similarities and differences between the United States and Scottish experiences of PCCP are highlighted and a series of recommendations offered to further implementation of this essential recovery-oriented practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人为本的心理健康规划:跨大西洋合作,解决实施障碍。
人们越来越认识到,以人为本的协作式护理规划方法有助于实现个人康复成果。然而,尽管人们对支持以人为本的规划的因素有了很多了解,但成功实施往往仍是一个难以实现的目标。本文回顾了国际上为促进以人为本的护理规划(PCCP)所做的努力,包括美国的随机临床试验和 "有意义和可衡量的倡议"(Meaningful and Measurable initiative),后者是一个由苏格兰不同医疗机构参与的合作行动研究项目。作者回顾了国际上实施 PCCP 的历史,并提供了初步证据,说明 PCCP 对过程结果(如主要治疗关系的性质和服务使用者的体验)和个人康复结果(如生活质量、社区归属感和有价值的角色)的积极影响。PCCP 将通过描述与关系方面(如利益相关者角色和对话的转变)和文件/记录方面(如如何在书面或电子记录中记录以人为本的关系)相关的关键原则和实践来定义。重点介绍了美国和苏格兰在 "以人为中心的康复计划 "方面的异同,并为进一步实施这种以康复为导向的基本做法提出了一系列建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot Test of Using Peer Specialists to Deliver Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training. Is Capability to Manage Finances Stable Over Time? "How do we force six visits on a consumer?": Street-level dilemmas and strategies for person-centered care under Medicaid fee-for-service. Screening homeless Veterans for a voluntary money management skills training program A recovery-oriented peer provider (ROPP) work-role model and prototype measure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1