{"title":"Towards an Amicable Solution: The Inter-State Communications Procedure under ICERD","authors":"Jan Eiken, David Keane","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nArticles 11–13 ICERD provide for inter-State communications before the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. The mechanism was triggered for the first time in 2018, with three inter-State communications – Qatar v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar v. United Arab Emirates and Palestine v. Israel. This article offers a detailed, article-by-article analysis of the ICERD inter-State communications mechanism. It looks back at CERD decision-making under Article 11, which pioneered rules of procedure and practice in inter-State communications before a UN treaty body. It considers the composition of the ad hoc Conciliation Commissions under Article 12. It looks forward to the role of the ad hoc Conciliation Commissions under Article 13 in terms of fact-finding, an amicable solution and recommendations. In conclusion, the potential of the Articles 11–13 mechanism as a global contentious human rights jurisdiction is emphasised.","PeriodicalId":42613,"journal":{"name":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Articles 11–13 ICERD provide for inter-State communications before the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. The mechanism was triggered for the first time in 2018, with three inter-State communications – Qatar v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar v. United Arab Emirates and Palestine v. Israel. This article offers a detailed, article-by-article analysis of the ICERD inter-State communications mechanism. It looks back at CERD decision-making under Article 11, which pioneered rules of procedure and practice in inter-State communications before a UN treaty body. It considers the composition of the ad hoc Conciliation Commissions under Article 12. It looks forward to the role of the ad hoc Conciliation Commissions under Article 13 in terms of fact-finding, an amicable solution and recommendations. In conclusion, the potential of the Articles 11–13 mechanism as a global contentious human rights jurisdiction is emphasised.
期刊介绍：
The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals is firmly established as the leading journal in its field. Each issue will give you the latest developments with respect to the preparation, adoption, suspension, amendment and revision of Rules of Procedure as well as statutory and internal rules and other related matters. The Journal will also provide you with the latest practice with respect to the interpretation and application of rules of procedure and constitutional documents, which can be found in judgments, advisory opinions, written and oral pleadings as well as legal literature.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
