Impact of claim settlement procedure of health insurance companies on customer satisfaction during the pandemic: A case of third-party administrators

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Insurance Markets and Companies Pub Date : 2022-11-14 DOI:10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.06
S. Kadyan, N. Bhasin, V. Madhukar
{"title":"Impact of claim settlement procedure of health insurance companies on customer satisfaction during the pandemic: A case of third-party administrators","authors":"S. Kadyan, N. Bhasin, V. Madhukar","doi":"10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The claim settlement process is one of the most critical aspects of health insurance. Many policyholder grievances often surface during claim settlement, which will likely shape the insurer’s reputation. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the relationships between hypothesized factors concerning the third-party administrator’s claim settlement process as perceived by policyholders. The paper used the data of policyholders from Delhi/NCR, India, who have availed the cashless claims in the last three years. In the process, a total of 790 questionnaires were sought to be. The methodology used was the extractive factor analysis comprising the KMO test, reliability assessment with Cronbach’s Alpha, and correlation assessment. The study attempted to evaluate all the contributing factors that shape the third-party administrator’s behavior during the claim settlement. Therefore, different factors were identified (themes A, B, C, and D). The study reported a significant relationship between insurance company perceptions (0.162), network hospital perceptions (0.182), product design (0.180), insurance agent (0.332), communications (0.114), disclosure (0.122), internal practices (0.143), and TPA claim settlement prospects across the Indian perspective. The contextual impacts on individual and group decision-making must be monitored and accommodated across effective public policy management concerning settlement of health insurance claims. The study findings could help insurers create business models leading to better customer satisfaction and congruence between agents, policyholders, TPAs, and health insurance companies.","PeriodicalId":32827,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Markets and Companies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Markets and Companies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The claim settlement process is one of the most critical aspects of health insurance. Many policyholder grievances often surface during claim settlement, which will likely shape the insurer’s reputation. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the relationships between hypothesized factors concerning the third-party administrator’s claim settlement process as perceived by policyholders. The paper used the data of policyholders from Delhi/NCR, India, who have availed the cashless claims in the last three years. In the process, a total of 790 questionnaires were sought to be. The methodology used was the extractive factor analysis comprising the KMO test, reliability assessment with Cronbach’s Alpha, and correlation assessment. The study attempted to evaluate all the contributing factors that shape the third-party administrator’s behavior during the claim settlement. Therefore, different factors were identified (themes A, B, C, and D). The study reported a significant relationship between insurance company perceptions (0.162), network hospital perceptions (0.182), product design (0.180), insurance agent (0.332), communications (0.114), disclosure (0.122), internal practices (0.143), and TPA claim settlement prospects across the Indian perspective. The contextual impacts on individual and group decision-making must be monitored and accommodated across effective public policy management concerning settlement of health insurance claims. The study findings could help insurers create business models leading to better customer satisfaction and congruence between agents, policyholders, TPAs, and health insurance companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行期间健康保险公司理赔程序对客户满意度的影响:第三方管理人员的案例
理赔流程是健康保险最关键的方面之一。在理赔过程中,许多投保人的不满情绪往往会浮出水面,这可能会影响保险公司的声誉。因此,本研究旨在评估投保人所感知的第三方管理人理赔过程中假设因素之间的关系。该论文使用了来自印度德里/NCR的保单持有人的数据,他们在过去三年中利用了无现金索赔。在此过程中,共收集了790份问卷。使用的方法是提取因子分析,包括KMO检验、Cronbach 's Alpha信度评估和相关性评估。本研究试图评估在索赔解决过程中影响第三方管理人行为的所有因素。因此,确定了不同的因素(主题A、B、C和D)。该研究报告了保险公司认知(0.162)、网络医院认知(0.182)、产品设计(0.180)、保险代理人(0.332)、沟通(0.114)、披露(0.122)、内部实践(0.143)和TPA索赔解决前景之间的显著关系。必须在解决健康保险索赔的有效公共政策管理中监测和适应环境对个人和群体决策的影响。研究结果可以帮助保险公司创造商业模式,从而提高客户满意度,促进代理人、投保人、tpa和健康保险公司之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Markets and Companies
Insurance Markets and Companies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficiency assessment and trends in the insurance industry: A bibliometric analysis of DEA application Competitive positioning and market share of selected insurance companies: case of Nigeria Leadership in the digital era: Exploring the nexus between leadership styles and job satisfaction. The mediating role of perceived organizational politics in Jordanian insurance companies Contribution of the non-life insurance sector to the economic growth of Nepal: Analysis from the EGLS approach The use of blockchain in the insurance industry: A bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1