Fostering the Success of Working-Class Latina Doctoral Students at Predominantly White Institutions

Q2 Social Sciences International Journal of Doctoral Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.28945/4886
Loni Crumb
{"title":"Fostering the Success of Working-Class Latina Doctoral Students at Predominantly White Institutions","authors":"Loni Crumb","doi":"10.28945/4886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: Latina doctoral students’ educational experiences are often mediated by their social class status, race, and gender. Latinas have sustained an increasing presence in doctoral programs at various colleges and universities across the United States; yet, they are continually underrepresented in doctoral programs at predominantly White institutions. The author identifies evidence-supported, personal and institutional factors that may contribute to working-class Latina doctoral students’ successful persistence at predominantly White institutions. Background: The tension between personal identities versus academic capability can make the doctoral education experience academically, socially, emotionally, and financially challenging for Latinas from low-income backgrounds. Latina/Latino Critical Race Theory and Multiracial Feminist Theory are introduced as lenses to examine aspects of the doctoral education experience that may impede or support Latina students’ retention. Methodology: As a conceptual article, this paper is an examination of research regarding the experiences of doctoral students of color at predominantly White institutions in the United States and summarizes how Latina doctoral students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds can succeed in these environments. Contribution: This article outlines evidence-supported strategies that may influence working-class Latina doctoral students’ successful persistence at predominantly White institutions. Findings: The research highlighted in this article emphasizes how factors such as embracing familismo, increasing faculty diversity, establishing peer networks, and creating inclusive class-concious academic programs and new student orientations, may contribute to the doctoral persistence of Latinas from economically disadvantaged backgrounds attending predominantly White institutions. Recommendations for Practitioners: Personal and institutional factors are recommended for faculty and student affairs professionals to support the doctoral persistence of Latina students such as embracing personal agency and academic efficacy, embracing familismo, recognizing the myth of meritocracy, establishing peer support networks, creating inclusive academic environments, establishing formal faculty mentorships, and fostering class conscious faculty. Recommendation for Researchers: The literature presented in this paper provides ideas for future research opportunities that could further examine how supportive relationships and inclusiveness promote Latina doctoral students’ educational success. Impact on Society: Latinas experience overlapping forms of privilege and subordination depending on their race, social class, gender, sexual orientation, and academic setting. Future Research: Further development of transformative research on this topic may improve inclusive educational practices and potentially increase access to doctoral-level education for Latinas and other economically disadvantaged students of color.","PeriodicalId":53524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: Latina doctoral students’ educational experiences are often mediated by their social class status, race, and gender. Latinas have sustained an increasing presence in doctoral programs at various colleges and universities across the United States; yet, they are continually underrepresented in doctoral programs at predominantly White institutions. The author identifies evidence-supported, personal and institutional factors that may contribute to working-class Latina doctoral students’ successful persistence at predominantly White institutions. Background: The tension between personal identities versus academic capability can make the doctoral education experience academically, socially, emotionally, and financially challenging for Latinas from low-income backgrounds. Latina/Latino Critical Race Theory and Multiracial Feminist Theory are introduced as lenses to examine aspects of the doctoral education experience that may impede or support Latina students’ retention. Methodology: As a conceptual article, this paper is an examination of research regarding the experiences of doctoral students of color at predominantly White institutions in the United States and summarizes how Latina doctoral students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds can succeed in these environments. Contribution: This article outlines evidence-supported strategies that may influence working-class Latina doctoral students’ successful persistence at predominantly White institutions. Findings: The research highlighted in this article emphasizes how factors such as embracing familismo, increasing faculty diversity, establishing peer networks, and creating inclusive class-concious academic programs and new student orientations, may contribute to the doctoral persistence of Latinas from economically disadvantaged backgrounds attending predominantly White institutions. Recommendations for Practitioners: Personal and institutional factors are recommended for faculty and student affairs professionals to support the doctoral persistence of Latina students such as embracing personal agency and academic efficacy, embracing familismo, recognizing the myth of meritocracy, establishing peer support networks, creating inclusive academic environments, establishing formal faculty mentorships, and fostering class conscious faculty. Recommendation for Researchers: The literature presented in this paper provides ideas for future research opportunities that could further examine how supportive relationships and inclusiveness promote Latina doctoral students’ educational success. Impact on Society: Latinas experience overlapping forms of privilege and subordination depending on their race, social class, gender, sexual orientation, and academic setting. Future Research: Further development of transformative research on this topic may improve inclusive educational practices and potentially increase access to doctoral-level education for Latinas and other economically disadvantaged students of color.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以白人为主的院校培养拉美裔工薪阶层博士生的成功
目的/目的:拉丁裔博士生的教育经历往往受到其社会阶级地位、种族和性别的影响。拉丁裔在美国各学院和大学的博士课程中持续增加;然而,在以白人为主的机构的博士课程中,他们的人数一直不足。作者确定了有证据支持的个人和制度因素,这些因素可能有助于工薪阶层的拉丁裔博士生成功地坚持在以白人为主的机构中学习。背景:个人身份与学术能力之间的紧张关系会使低收入背景的拉丁裔人在学术、社会、情感和经济方面的博士教育经历充满挑战。拉丁裔/拉丁裔批判种族理论和多种族女权主义理论被引入作为透镜来检查博士教育经历的各个方面,这些方面可能阻碍或支持拉丁裔学生的保留。方法:作为一篇概念性文章,本文对美国以白人为主的机构中有色人种博士生的经历进行了研究,并总结了来自经济弱势背景的拉丁裔博士生如何在这些环境中取得成功。贡献:本文概述了有证据支持的策略,这些策略可能会影响工薪阶层的拉丁裔博士生在以白人为主的机构中成功地坚持下去。研究结果:文章中强调的研究强调了诸如拥抱家庭主义、增加教师多样性、建立同伴网络、创建包容性的阶级意识学术课程和新的学生方向等因素,可能有助于来自经济弱势背景的拉丁裔人在以白人为主的机构中坚持攻读博士学位。对从业者的建议:教师和学生事务专业人员建议个人和制度因素支持拉丁裔学生的博士坚持,如拥抱个人代理和学术效能,拥抱家庭主义,认识精英管理的神话,建立同伴支持网络,创造包容性的学术环境,建立正式的教师指导,培养阶级意识的教师。对研究人员的建议:本文提出的文献为未来的研究机会提供了思路,可以进一步研究支持关系和包容性如何促进拉丁裔博士生的教育成功。对社会的影响:拉丁裔因其种族、社会阶层、性别、性取向和学术背景而经历着特权和从属的重叠形式。未来研究:进一步发展这一主题的变革性研究可能会改善包容性教育实践,并有可能增加拉丁裔和其他经济上处于不利地位的有色人种学生接受博士级教育的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
International Journal of Doctoral Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A Framework of Rhetorical Moves Designed to Scaffold the Research Proposal Development Process What Does It Mean To Be a Resilient Student? An Explorative Study of Doctoral Students’ Resilience and Coping Strategies Using Grounded Theory as the Analytic Lens PhD by Prospective Publication in Australian Business Schools: Provocations from a Collaborative Autoethnography Mitigating Ceiling Effects in a Longitudinal Study of Doctoral Engineering Student Stress and Persistence Into the Challenges of Aligning Key Sections of Doctoral Dissertations: Cognitive Analysis, Pedagogical Tools, and Instrument Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1