The RIFLE Classification: A Stratification Scheme for Patients of Acute Renal Failure after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Rumman Idris, Musaid Khan, M. Kamruzzaman, Abdul Hannan, H. Kabir, N. Jahan
{"title":"The RIFLE Classification: A Stratification Scheme for Patients of Acute Renal Failure after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery","authors":"Rumman Idris, Musaid Khan, M. Kamruzzaman, Abdul Hannan, H. Kabir, N. Jahan","doi":"10.3329/cardio.v14i2.58780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute renal failure is linked to an increased risk of death and morbidity after cardiac surgery. Because there are no standard criteria for acute renal damage, there is a wide variation in the reports that have been published. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup has developed new RIFLE criteria for acute renal dysfunction. The goal of current study was to appraise whether this definition of postoperative renal dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) was accurate.\nMethods: Fifty patients with critical coronary artery disease & undergoing CABG were enrolled in the study. Out of 50 patients, 25 patients had CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and remaining 25 underwent off pump CABG (OPCAB). Patients were distributed into various groups (based on the severity of renal impairment) using the RIFLE classification: Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage kidney disease) depending on either serum creatinine level/ estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or urine output. The variation with 30 days-mortality, ICU stay and renal replacement therapy after CABG were identified.\nResults: After CABG, 10% of patients experienced renal impairment, as per definitions of RIFLE classification. In this study, there is no significant difference in ARF (RIFLE classification-normal and risk) with or without use of CPB. However, incidence of RIFLE- injury and failure is higher in CPB group than no CPB group. The postoperative proportions of death and renal failure necessitating renal replacement therapy (RRT) were 2% (number of patients, 1 of 50) and 2% (1 of 50), respectively in RIFLE-failure. For the whole study cohort, the median duration of postoperative ICU stay was 4.0 days, with interquartile ranges of 3.0 to 7.0 days. All the patients of Rifle classification-injury and failure had prolonged ICU stay (5 or more days).\nConclusions: The RIFLE criteria are a useful tool for determining renal impairment after CABG. Increased renal replacement treatment, longer ICU stays, and a higher death rate are all linked to the severity of RIFLE classification.\nCardiovasc j 2022; 14(2): 150-156","PeriodicalId":9438,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v14i2.58780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute renal failure is linked to an increased risk of death and morbidity after cardiac surgery. Because there are no standard criteria for acute renal damage, there is a wide variation in the reports that have been published. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup has developed new RIFLE criteria for acute renal dysfunction. The goal of current study was to appraise whether this definition of postoperative renal dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) was accurate. Methods: Fifty patients with critical coronary artery disease & undergoing CABG were enrolled in the study. Out of 50 patients, 25 patients had CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and remaining 25 underwent off pump CABG (OPCAB). Patients were distributed into various groups (based on the severity of renal impairment) using the RIFLE classification: Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage kidney disease) depending on either serum creatinine level/ estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or urine output. The variation with 30 days-mortality, ICU stay and renal replacement therapy after CABG were identified. Results: After CABG, 10% of patients experienced renal impairment, as per definitions of RIFLE classification. In this study, there is no significant difference in ARF (RIFLE classification-normal and risk) with or without use of CPB. However, incidence of RIFLE- injury and failure is higher in CPB group than no CPB group. The postoperative proportions of death and renal failure necessitating renal replacement therapy (RRT) were 2% (number of patients, 1 of 50) and 2% (1 of 50), respectively in RIFLE-failure. For the whole study cohort, the median duration of postoperative ICU stay was 4.0 days, with interquartile ranges of 3.0 to 7.0 days. All the patients of Rifle classification-injury and failure had prolonged ICU stay (5 or more days). Conclusions: The RIFLE criteria are a useful tool for determining renal impairment after CABG. Increased renal replacement treatment, longer ICU stays, and a higher death rate are all linked to the severity of RIFLE classification. Cardiovasc j 2022; 14(2): 150-156
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉搭桥术后急性肾功能衰竭患者的RIFLE分级:分层方案
背景:急性肾衰竭与心脏手术后死亡和发病风险增加有关。由于没有急性肾损害的标准,在已发表的报告中有很大的差异。急性透析质量倡议工作组制定了急性肾功能不全的新步枪标准。本研究的目的是评估冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)后肾功能不全的定义是否准确。方法:选取50例危重冠状动脉病变行冠脉搭桥的患者作为研究对象。在50例患者中,25例患者行CABG合并体外循环(CPB),其余25例患者行体外循环CABG (OPCAB)。根据血清肌酐水平/估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)或尿量,使用RIFLE分类(风险、损伤、衰竭、丧失、终末期肾病)将患者分为不同的组(基于肾功能损害的严重程度)。确定CABG后30天死亡率、ICU住院时间和肾脏替代治疗的变化。结果:CABG后,10%的患者出现肾功能损害,符合RIFLE分类定义。在本研究中,使用CPB或不使用CPB的ARF(步枪分类-正常和危险)无显著差异。然而,CPB组的RIFLE-损伤和失败发生率高于未CPB组。术后死亡和肾衰竭需要肾替代治疗(RRT)的比例分别为2%(50例患者中有1例)和2%(50例患者中有1例)。在整个研究队列中,术后ICU住院时间中位数为4.0天,四分位数间范围为3.0 ~ 7.0天。所有Rifle分类-损伤和失败的患者都延长了ICU的住院时间(5天及以上)。结论:RIFLE标准是判断冠脉搭桥术后肾功能损害的有效工具。增加的肾脏替代治疗、更长的ICU住院时间和更高的死亡率都与RIFLE分类的严重程度有关。心血管病杂志[j] 2022;14 (2): 150 - 156
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Outcome of Off-Pump Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in a Specialized center in Bangladesh Historic photos related to Cardiac Surgery in Bangladesh Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcome Between Intermittent Intravenous Heparin versus Continuous Heparin Infusion after Initial Bolus Dose during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Use of the Left Ventricular Internal Dimension at End-Diastole and the Mitral Valve E-Point Septal Separation Ratio in the Prediction of the Left Ventricular Systolic Function Remembering Christiaan Barnard in Philately
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1