Moving Authentic Soil Research into High School Classrooms: Student Engagement and Learning

Bianca N. Moebius-Clune, Irka H. Elsevier, Barbara A. Crawford, Nancy M. Trautmann, Robert R. Schindelbeck, Harold M. van Es
{"title":"Moving Authentic Soil Research into High School Classrooms: Student Engagement and Learning","authors":"Bianca N. Moebius-Clune,&nbsp;Irka H. Elsevier,&nbsp;Barbara A. Crawford,&nbsp;Nancy M. Trautmann,&nbsp;Robert R. Schindelbeck,&nbsp;Harold M. van Es","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0019k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inquiry-based teaching helps students develop a deep, applied understanding of human–environmental connections, but most high school curricula do not use inquiry-based methods. Soil science topics, which are also generally lacking from curricula, can provide hands-on model systems for learning inquiry skills. We report on the implementation of a soil science inquiry unit for high school earth science classrooms. Teams in three classes participated in open inquiry about water runoff from, and infiltration into soils. Students learned how scientists conduct research by asking their own research questions, designing and conducting investigations, presenting findings to their peers, and peer-reviewing each other's work. Student engagement and learning were assessed through testing, final projects, a student survey, and observations of student attitudes. Pre- to post-test gains (17% average gain from 63% average pre-test score, with 71% maximum gain) showed significant student science-content-learning. Generally lower scores on final projects (61% average) than on post-tests (80% average) suggest the need for more teacher-scaffolding in complex, open-ended assignments. Students reported enjoying the unit and learning essential inquiry skills, such as experimental design, scientifically based teamwork and group-learning, and real world applicability of concepts. Observations suggest that students were motivated and substantively engaged. One-third of students reported increased excitement about science. We conclude that inquiry-based units should be more commonly used in science classrooms, to enable students to learn how to think critically, develop collaborative teamwork skills, take ownership of their learning, and be substantively engaged in authentic tasks applicable in later life.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"102-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0019k","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0019k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Inquiry-based teaching helps students develop a deep, applied understanding of human–environmental connections, but most high school curricula do not use inquiry-based methods. Soil science topics, which are also generally lacking from curricula, can provide hands-on model systems for learning inquiry skills. We report on the implementation of a soil science inquiry unit for high school earth science classrooms. Teams in three classes participated in open inquiry about water runoff from, and infiltration into soils. Students learned how scientists conduct research by asking their own research questions, designing and conducting investigations, presenting findings to their peers, and peer-reviewing each other's work. Student engagement and learning were assessed through testing, final projects, a student survey, and observations of student attitudes. Pre- to post-test gains (17% average gain from 63% average pre-test score, with 71% maximum gain) showed significant student science-content-learning. Generally lower scores on final projects (61% average) than on post-tests (80% average) suggest the need for more teacher-scaffolding in complex, open-ended assignments. Students reported enjoying the unit and learning essential inquiry skills, such as experimental design, scientifically based teamwork and group-learning, and real world applicability of concepts. Observations suggest that students were motivated and substantively engaged. One-third of students reported increased excitement about science. We conclude that inquiry-based units should be more commonly used in science classrooms, to enable students to learn how to think critically, develop collaborative teamwork skills, take ownership of their learning, and be substantively engaged in authentic tasks applicable in later life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将真实土壤研究带入高中课堂:学生参与和学习
探究式教学帮助学生发展对人与环境关系的深刻的、应用的理解,但是大多数高中课程并没有使用探究式的方法。土壤科学主题,也普遍缺乏从课程,可以提供动手模型系统学习探究技能。我们报告了在高中地球科学课堂中实施土壤科学探究单元的情况。三个班级的小组参与了关于土壤径流和渗透的公开调查。学生们通过提出自己的研究问题、设计和开展调查、向同行展示研究结果以及同行评审彼此的工作,学习科学家如何进行研究。通过测试、期末项目、学生调查和学生态度观察来评估学生的参与度和学习情况。测试前和测试后的收益(平均收益17%,测试前平均收益63%,最大收益71%)显示了学生对科学内容的显著学习。通常期末项目的分数(平均61%)低于后测试的分数(平均80%),这表明在复杂的开放式作业中需要更多的教师指导。学生们报告说,他们喜欢这个单元,并学习了基本的探究技能,比如实验设计、基于科学的团队合作和小组学习,以及概念在现实世界中的适用性。观察表明,学生们积极主动,积极投入。三分之一的学生表示对科学的兴趣增加了。我们的结论是,探究性单元应该在科学课堂中更普遍地使用,以使学生学习如何批判性思考,培养合作团队合作技能,掌握自己的学习,并实质性地参与到适用于以后生活的真实任务中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corn Rootworm: Small Insect, Big Impact Assessing Student Learning with Surveys and a Pre-Test/Post-Test in an Online Course Student Presentations of Case Studies to Illustrate Core Concepts in Soil Biogeochemistry Using Student Competition Field Trips to Increase Teaching and Learning Effectiveness JNRLSE Editorial Board Minutes for 2011
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1