Indicators of quality education: empirical evidence from students, teachers and parents in Osun State

O. Opesemowo, Rukayat Oyebola Iwintolu, E. Afolabi
{"title":"Indicators of quality education: empirical evidence from students, teachers and parents in Osun State","authors":"O. Opesemowo, Rukayat Oyebola Iwintolu, E. Afolabi","doi":"10.21303/2504-5571.2023.002926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study gathered empirical evidence of stakeholders' indicators of quality education in Osun State, Nigeria. The study deployed a mixed-method research design. The study examined indicators of quality education, identified by students, teachers, and parents in the state. The population comprised secondary school students, teachers, and parents in the selected state. The sample consisted of 400 students, 186 teachers, and 13 parents. Four Local Government Areas (LGAs) were randomly selected from the 30 LGAs in Osun State; five schools were selected from each LGAs using a convenience sampling technique, totaling 20 schools. Twenty students were selected by purposive sampling to include JSS 1 and 2 and SSS 1 and 2 classes from each of the schools selected. Ten teachers were sampled from each school, while 13 parents of students from the selected schools were reached through voluntary participation as indicated by students. Three instruments were developed for the study; two of which were quantitative (targeting students and teachers), and the third was qualitative (addressing parents). The first instrument was titled \"Students' Indicators of Quality Education Checklist\"; the second was \"Teachers' Indicators of Quality Education Checklist,\" while the third instrument was named \"Parents' Interview Guide on Indicators of Quality Education\" The items on the checklists and interview guide were extracted from the literature. The construct validity of the checklists was established by subjecting the items generated to experts' scrutiny. The Content Validity Ratio (CVR) of the instrument was 0.84. The reliability analysis yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.78. The results showed high correlations (r = 0.7, p > 0.05) between standard and students’ ratings. The study concluded that stakeholders' indicators of quality education were valid.","PeriodicalId":33606,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA Social and Humanities","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA Social and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2023.002926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study gathered empirical evidence of stakeholders' indicators of quality education in Osun State, Nigeria. The study deployed a mixed-method research design. The study examined indicators of quality education, identified by students, teachers, and parents in the state. The population comprised secondary school students, teachers, and parents in the selected state. The sample consisted of 400 students, 186 teachers, and 13 parents. Four Local Government Areas (LGAs) were randomly selected from the 30 LGAs in Osun State; five schools were selected from each LGAs using a convenience sampling technique, totaling 20 schools. Twenty students were selected by purposive sampling to include JSS 1 and 2 and SSS 1 and 2 classes from each of the schools selected. Ten teachers were sampled from each school, while 13 parents of students from the selected schools were reached through voluntary participation as indicated by students. Three instruments were developed for the study; two of which were quantitative (targeting students and teachers), and the third was qualitative (addressing parents). The first instrument was titled "Students' Indicators of Quality Education Checklist"; the second was "Teachers' Indicators of Quality Education Checklist," while the third instrument was named "Parents' Interview Guide on Indicators of Quality Education" The items on the checklists and interview guide were extracted from the literature. The construct validity of the checklists was established by subjecting the items generated to experts' scrutiny. The Content Validity Ratio (CVR) of the instrument was 0.84. The reliability analysis yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.78. The results showed high correlations (r = 0.7, p > 0.05) between standard and students’ ratings. The study concluded that stakeholders' indicators of quality education were valid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优质教育指标:来自奥松州学生、教师和家长的经验证据
该研究收集了尼日利亚奥松州利益相关者的优质教育指标的经验证据。本研究采用混合方法研究设计。该研究检查了由该州学生、教师和家长确定的优质教育指标。人口包括所选州的中学生、教师和家长。样本包括400名学生、186名教师和13名家长。从奥松州的30个地方政府区中随机选择了4个地方政府区;采用方便抽样的方法,从每个地方自治团体中选出5所学校,共计20所。本研究采用有目的抽样的方法,从所选学校的1、2班和1、2班中抽取20名学生。每所学校抽取10名教师,并根据学生的意愿,通过自愿参与联系到13名学生家长。为此研究开发了三种仪器;其中两个是定量的(针对学生和教师),第三个是定性的(针对家长)。第一份文书名为《学生素质教育指标清单》;第二份是《教师素质教育指标清单》,第三份是《家长素质教育指标访谈指南》,其中的内容和访谈指南摘自文献。通过对生成的项目进行专家审查,确定了清单的构念效度。仪器的内容效比(CVR)为0.84。信度分析的Cronbach's Alpha为0.78。结果表明,标准评分与学生评分呈高度相关(r = 0.7, p > 0.05)。研究结果表明,利益相关者的素质教育指标是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risky sexual behavior and associated factors among in-school adolescents: a school-based, cross-sectional study Experiencing work in the fourth industrial revolution: a qualitative study on work identity and new ways of work Epistemological access: a case of academic development programmes at a university of technology Virtual small business entrepreneurship opportunities Internationalisation of higher education in the new normal in universities: university management perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1