011 Worsening longitudinal reaction time trajectories using the MSReactor computerised battery predicts confirmed EDSS progression

D. Merlo, J. Stankovich, C. Bai, T. Kalincik, M. Gresle, J. Lechner-Scott, T. Kilpatrick, M. Barnett, B. Taylor, D. Darby, H. Butzkueven, A. Walt
{"title":"011 Worsening longitudinal reaction time trajectories using the MSReactor computerised battery predicts confirmed EDSS progression","authors":"D. Merlo, J. Stankovich, C. Bai, T. Kalincik, M. Gresle, J. Lechner-Scott, T. Kilpatrick, M. Barnett, B. Taylor, D. Darby, H. Butzkueven, A. Walt","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To identify and validate longitudinal reaction time trajectories in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis using a computerised cognitive battery and latent class mixed modelling, and to assess the association between reaction time trajectories and disability progression. Methods Participants serially completed web-based computerised reaction time tasks measuring psychomotor speed, visual attention and working memory. Testing sessions were completed 6-monthly with the option of additional home based testing. Participants who completed at least three testing sessions over a minimum of 180 days were included in the analysis. Longitudinal reaction times were modelled using Latent Class Mixed Models to group individuals sharing similar latent characteristics. Models were tested for consistency using a cross-validation approach. Inter-class differences in the probability of reaction time worsening and the probability of 6-month confirmed disability progression were assessed using survival analysis. Results A total of 460 relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients were included. For each task of the MSReactor computerised cognitive battery, the optimal model comprised of 3 latent classes. All tasks could identify a group with high probability of reaction time slowing. The visual attention and working memory tasks could identify a group of participants who were 3.7 and 2.6 times more likely to experience a 6-month confirmed disability progression, respectively. Participants could be classified into predicted cognitive trajectories after just 5 tests with between 64% and 89% accuracy. Conclusion Latent class modelling of longitudinal cognitive data collected by the MSReactor battery identified a group of patients with worsening reaction times and increased risk of disability progression.","PeriodicalId":19692,"journal":{"name":"Oral abstracts","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To identify and validate longitudinal reaction time trajectories in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis using a computerised cognitive battery and latent class mixed modelling, and to assess the association between reaction time trajectories and disability progression. Methods Participants serially completed web-based computerised reaction time tasks measuring psychomotor speed, visual attention and working memory. Testing sessions were completed 6-monthly with the option of additional home based testing. Participants who completed at least three testing sessions over a minimum of 180 days were included in the analysis. Longitudinal reaction times were modelled using Latent Class Mixed Models to group individuals sharing similar latent characteristics. Models were tested for consistency using a cross-validation approach. Inter-class differences in the probability of reaction time worsening and the probability of 6-month confirmed disability progression were assessed using survival analysis. Results A total of 460 relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients were included. For each task of the MSReactor computerised cognitive battery, the optimal model comprised of 3 latent classes. All tasks could identify a group with high probability of reaction time slowing. The visual attention and working memory tasks could identify a group of participants who were 3.7 and 2.6 times more likely to experience a 6-month confirmed disability progression, respectively. Participants could be classified into predicted cognitive trajectories after just 5 tests with between 64% and 89% accuracy. Conclusion Latent class modelling of longitudinal cognitive data collected by the MSReactor battery identified a group of patients with worsening reaction times and increased risk of disability progression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用MSReactor计算机化电池的纵向反应时间轨迹恶化预测确认的EDSS进展
目的利用计算机化认知电池和潜在类别混合模型识别和验证复发缓解型多发性硬化症的纵向反应时间轨迹,并评估反应时间轨迹与残疾进展之间的关系。方法被试连续完成基于网络的计算机化反应时间任务,测量精神运动速度、视觉注意和工作记忆。每6个月完成一次测试,并可选择额外的家庭测试。在至少180天内完成至少三次测试的参与者被纳入分析。纵向反应时间使用潜在类别混合模型来对具有相似潜在特征的个体进行分组。使用交叉验证方法测试模型的一致性。使用生存分析评估反应时间恶化概率和6个月确认残疾进展概率的班级间差异。结果共纳入460例复发缓解型多发性硬化患者。对于MSReactor计算机化认知电池的每个任务,最优模型由3个潜在类组成。所有的任务都能识别出反应时间变慢的可能性很高的群体。视觉注意力和工作记忆任务可以识别出一组参与者,他们分别有3.7倍和2.6倍的可能性经历6个月的确认残疾进展。仅仅经过5次测试,参与者就可以按照预测的认知轨迹进行分类,准确率在64%到89%之间。结论MSReactor电池收集的纵向认知数据的潜在类别建模确定了一组反应时间恶化和残疾进展风险增加的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BOS4b.003 A definitional framework of advance care planning in dementia achieved a consensus in a 33-country delphi study BOS3c.001 Evaluating the impact of a virtual training programme for advance care planning facilitation in nursing homes in Singapore BOS3b.003 Utilizing simulated learning to develop non-clinical skills: a unique approach to improving advance care planning processes BOS4b.002 Advance care planning with a conversation game: a feasibility and acceptability study BOS5b.003 Attitudinal factors involved in advance directive adoption over a four-year period: evidence from a population-based study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1