Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication

Sanam Ghorbani Lyastani, Michael Schilling, Michaela Neumayr, M. Backes, Sven Bugiel
{"title":"Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication","authors":"Sanam Ghorbani Lyastani, Michael Schilling, Michaela Neumayr, M. Backes, Sven Bugiel","doi":"10.1109/SP40000.2020.00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The newest contender for succeeding passwords as the incumbent web authentication scheme is the FIDO2 standard. Jointly developed and backed by the FIDO Alliance and the W3C, FIDO2 has found support in virtually every browser, finds increasing support by service providers, and has adoptions beyond browser-software on its way. While it supports MFA and 2FA, its single-factor, passwordless authentication with security tokens has received the bulk of attention and was hailed by its supporters and the media as the solution that will replace text-passwords on the web. Despite its obvious security and deployability benefits—a setting that no prior solution had in this strong combination—the paradigm shift from a familiar knowledge factor to purely a possession factor raises questions about the acceptance of passwordless authentication by end-users.This paper presents the first large-scale lab study of FIDO2 single-factor authentication to collect insights about end-users’ perception, acceptance, and concerns about passwordless authentication. Through hands-on tasks our participants gather first-hand experience with passwordless authentication using a security key, which they afterwards reflect on in a survey. Our results show that users are willing to accept a direct replacement of text-based passwords with a security key for single-factor authentication. That is an encouraging result in the quest to replace passwords. But, our results also identify new concerns that can potentially hinder the widespread adoption of FIDO2 passwordless authentication. In order to mitigate these factors, we derive concrete recommendations to try to help in the ongoing proliferation of passwordless authentication on the web.","PeriodicalId":6849,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"28 1","pages":"268-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

The newest contender for succeeding passwords as the incumbent web authentication scheme is the FIDO2 standard. Jointly developed and backed by the FIDO Alliance and the W3C, FIDO2 has found support in virtually every browser, finds increasing support by service providers, and has adoptions beyond browser-software on its way. While it supports MFA and 2FA, its single-factor, passwordless authentication with security tokens has received the bulk of attention and was hailed by its supporters and the media as the solution that will replace text-passwords on the web. Despite its obvious security and deployability benefits—a setting that no prior solution had in this strong combination—the paradigm shift from a familiar knowledge factor to purely a possession factor raises questions about the acceptance of passwordless authentication by end-users.This paper presents the first large-scale lab study of FIDO2 single-factor authentication to collect insights about end-users’ perception, acceptance, and concerns about passwordless authentication. Through hands-on tasks our participants gather first-hand experience with passwordless authentication using a security key, which they afterwards reflect on in a survey. Our results show that users are willing to accept a direct replacement of text-based passwords with a security key for single-factor authentication. That is an encouraging result in the quest to replace passwords. But, our results also identify new concerns that can potentially hinder the widespread adoption of FIDO2 passwordless authentication. In order to mitigate these factors, we derive concrete recommendations to try to help in the ongoing proliferation of passwordless authentication on the web.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FIDO2是用户认证的弑君者吗?FIDO2无密码认证的可用性比较研究
接替密码作为现有web认证方案的最新竞争者是FIDO2标准。FIDO2由FIDO联盟和W3C共同开发和支持,已经在几乎所有浏览器中得到了支持,得到了越来越多的服务提供商的支持,并且正在被浏览器软件以外的应用所采用。虽然它支持MFA和2FA,但其使用安全令牌的单因素无密码身份验证受到了大量关注,并被其支持者和媒体誉为将取代网络上的文本密码的解决方案。尽管它具有明显的安全性和可部署性优势(在这种强组合中没有先前的解决方案具有这种设置),但从熟悉的知识因素到纯粹的拥有因素的范式转变引发了最终用户接受无密码身份验证的问题。本文介绍了FIDO2单因素身份验证的首次大规模实验室研究,以收集有关最终用户对无密码身份验证的感知、接受和关注的见解。通过实践任务,我们的参与者收集了使用安全密钥的无密码认证的第一手经验,然后他们在调查中反思这些经验。我们的研究结果表明,用户愿意接受用单因素身份验证的安全密钥直接替换基于文本的密码。在寻求替代密码的过程中,这是一个令人鼓舞的结果。但是,我们的研究结果也发现了新的问题,这些问题可能会阻碍FIDO2无密码身份验证的广泛采用。为了减轻这些因素,我们提出了具体的建议,试图帮助在网络上不断扩散的无密码身份验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unexpected Data Dependency Creation and Chaining: A New Attack to SDN TextExerciser: Feedback-driven Text Input Exercising for Android Applications Ijon: Exploring Deep State Spaces via Fuzzing Efficient and Secure Multiparty Computation from Fixed-Key Block Ciphers EverCrypt: A Fast, Verified, Cross-Platform Cryptographic Provider
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1