Zoning Rules! the Economics of Land Use Regulation

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Cato Journal Pub Date : 2016-09-22 DOI:10.5860/choice.193741
Nick Zaiac
{"title":"Zoning Rules! the Economics of Land Use Regulation","authors":"Nick Zaiac","doi":"10.5860/choice.193741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zoning Rules! The Economics of Land Use Regulation William A. Fischel Cambridge, Mass: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2015, 432 pp. Something has gone terribly wrong in America's cities in the last few decades. Real estate construction has fallen behind demand in cities like New York, San Francisco, Austin, and Miami. Rents are rising, and both current and prospective residents are having a hard time keeping up. The good news is that we know why this is happening. Mainstream economists agree that burdensome restrictions on building new housing in prosperous cities hurt economic growth, exacerbate inequality, and stifle entrepreneurship. The bad news is that it's going to be a huge challenge to fix. This is the lesson that Zoning Rules! teaches us. The book is the magnum opus of Dartmouth economist William Fischel, the follow-up to his acclaimed 1987 book The Economics of Zoning Laws. In the nearly 30 years between these tomes, Fischel spent his career exploring how land use rules came to be and what role they would play in the economy and society. Through careful history, a thorough understanding of property law, and sound economics, Zoning Rules! weaves a story of the rise of the exclusionary zoning laws that have come to strangle housing development in major metropolitan areas. The early years of zoning laws were relatively harmless and mundane compared to what would come later. Urban planners and the officials they appointed generally made pragmatic decisions that reflected the opinions of their constituents. When excluded from one town, developers could find another nearby. Minority factions had trouble blocking development if they lacked political power. It was the era of \"good housekeeping\" zoning. Fischel defines \"good housekeeping\" as basic separation of activities, such as noxious industry from residential areas, without attempts to control or micromanage growth. The period saw a boom in suburban building that would taper off over time. Fischel's theory is that something changed in the 1970s. A confluence of events precipitated the rise of exclusionary laws in the suburbs of the nation's cities. Employment decentralized from areas near ports with the advent of trucking, the interstate system, and the shipping container. Freed from center cities, industry fled to places where land was cheap and plentiful. The period saw housing grow to take up a greater share of household wealth. Combined with the civil rights movement's reforms, the period saw a serious increase in demand for exclusionary housing restrictions. Yet, demand is only part of the story. The supply pressures of exclusionary laws were serious. Unlike labor or capital, moving land from one municipality to another, while not impossible because of processes like municipal annexation, is a serious challenge. With ability to relocate to places with more hospitable legal institutions, weak zoning laws play a key role in the land use decisionmaking process. The period also saw the federalization of the environmental movement combine with the expansion of legal standing of development opponents and the advent of multilayered review by state government. Different departments and government bodies were given power to oversee various aspects of building. Development was bureaucratized, and with it, the transaction costs of the building process increased. The power dynamics of local government underwent a fundamental change. What was once a regime of \"good housekeeping\" laws was corrupted. More than anything, Zoning Rules! is a textbook of land use economics. Fischel is no pundit. Indeed, his grand theory isn't presented until the middle of a chapter in the middle of the book. Like its predecessor, Zoning Rules! is written to both explore and explain. It begins with a chapter laying out basic concepts of land economics, the basics of supply and demand for housing. The second chapter explains how zoning laws work and how they are administered. …","PeriodicalId":38832,"journal":{"name":"Cato Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"725"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cato Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.193741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Zoning Rules! The Economics of Land Use Regulation William A. Fischel Cambridge, Mass: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2015, 432 pp. Something has gone terribly wrong in America's cities in the last few decades. Real estate construction has fallen behind demand in cities like New York, San Francisco, Austin, and Miami. Rents are rising, and both current and prospective residents are having a hard time keeping up. The good news is that we know why this is happening. Mainstream economists agree that burdensome restrictions on building new housing in prosperous cities hurt economic growth, exacerbate inequality, and stifle entrepreneurship. The bad news is that it's going to be a huge challenge to fix. This is the lesson that Zoning Rules! teaches us. The book is the magnum opus of Dartmouth economist William Fischel, the follow-up to his acclaimed 1987 book The Economics of Zoning Laws. In the nearly 30 years between these tomes, Fischel spent his career exploring how land use rules came to be and what role they would play in the economy and society. Through careful history, a thorough understanding of property law, and sound economics, Zoning Rules! weaves a story of the rise of the exclusionary zoning laws that have come to strangle housing development in major metropolitan areas. The early years of zoning laws were relatively harmless and mundane compared to what would come later. Urban planners and the officials they appointed generally made pragmatic decisions that reflected the opinions of their constituents. When excluded from one town, developers could find another nearby. Minority factions had trouble blocking development if they lacked political power. It was the era of "good housekeeping" zoning. Fischel defines "good housekeeping" as basic separation of activities, such as noxious industry from residential areas, without attempts to control or micromanage growth. The period saw a boom in suburban building that would taper off over time. Fischel's theory is that something changed in the 1970s. A confluence of events precipitated the rise of exclusionary laws in the suburbs of the nation's cities. Employment decentralized from areas near ports with the advent of trucking, the interstate system, and the shipping container. Freed from center cities, industry fled to places where land was cheap and plentiful. The period saw housing grow to take up a greater share of household wealth. Combined with the civil rights movement's reforms, the period saw a serious increase in demand for exclusionary housing restrictions. Yet, demand is only part of the story. The supply pressures of exclusionary laws were serious. Unlike labor or capital, moving land from one municipality to another, while not impossible because of processes like municipal annexation, is a serious challenge. With ability to relocate to places with more hospitable legal institutions, weak zoning laws play a key role in the land use decisionmaking process. The period also saw the federalization of the environmental movement combine with the expansion of legal standing of development opponents and the advent of multilayered review by state government. Different departments and government bodies were given power to oversee various aspects of building. Development was bureaucratized, and with it, the transaction costs of the building process increased. The power dynamics of local government underwent a fundamental change. What was once a regime of "good housekeeping" laws was corrupted. More than anything, Zoning Rules! is a textbook of land use economics. Fischel is no pundit. Indeed, his grand theory isn't presented until the middle of a chapter in the middle of the book. Like its predecessor, Zoning Rules! is written to both explore and explain. It begins with a chapter laying out basic concepts of land economics, the basics of supply and demand for housing. The second chapter explains how zoning laws work and how they are administered. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分区规则!土地利用调控经济学
分区规则!William A. Fischel,剑桥,马萨诸塞州:林肯土地政策研究所,2015年,432页。在过去的几十年里,美国的城市出现了严重的问题。在纽约、旧金山、奥斯汀和迈阿密等城市,房地产建设已经落后于需求。房租在上涨,现在和未来的居民都很难跟上房租的上涨。好消息是,我们知道为什么会发生这种情况。主流经济学家一致认为,在繁荣城市建造新住房的繁重限制会损害经济增长,加剧不平等,扼杀创业精神。坏消息是,解决这个问题将是一个巨大的挑战。这是分区规则的教训!教我们。这本书是达特茅斯大学经济学家威廉·费希尔的代表作,是他1987年出版的广受好评的《分区法经济学》的续集。在这两部大部头著作之间的近30年时间里,费歇尔的整个职业生涯都在探索土地使用规则是如何形成的,以及它们在经济和社会中扮演了什么角色。通过仔细的历史,对物权法的透彻理解,以及健全的经济学,分区规则!编织了一个关于排他性分区法兴起的故事,这些法律已经扼杀了主要大都市地区的住房开发。与后来的情况相比,分区法的最初几年相对无害、平淡无奇。城市规划者和他们任命的官员通常会做出反映选民意见的务实决定。当被一个城镇拒之门外时,开发商可以在附近找到另一个城镇。如果少数派系缺乏政治权力,他们很难阻止发展。这是一个“好管家”分区的时代。Fischel将“良好的内务管理”定义为活动的基本分离,例如有害工业与居民区的分离,而不试图控制或微观管理增长。在这一时期,郊区建筑出现了繁荣,但随着时间的推移,这种繁荣将逐渐减弱。Fischel的理论是在20世纪70年代发生了一些变化。一系列事件的汇合促成了排他性法律在美国城市郊区的兴起。随着卡车运输、州际运输系统和集装箱运输的出现,就业机会从港口附近地区分散开来。从中心城市解放出来后,工业逃到了土地便宜而丰富的地方。在这一时期,住房在家庭财富中所占的比重越来越大。与民权运动的改革相结合,这一时期对排他性住房限制的需求大幅增加。然而,需求只是故事的一部分。排他法的供给压力是严重的。与劳动力或资本不同,将土地从一个城市转移到另一个城市,虽然不是不可能,但由于城市兼并等过程,这是一个严重的挑战。由于有能力搬迁到法律制度更友好的地方,薄弱的分区法在土地使用决策过程中发挥了关键作用。在这一时期,环境运动的联邦化与反对发展的法律地位的扩大以及州政府多层次审查的出现相结合。不同的部门和政府机构有权监督建筑的各个方面。开发是官僚化的,与此同时,建设过程的交易成本也增加了。地方政府的权力格局发生了根本变化。曾经的“良好的内务管理”法律制度已经腐化。最重要的是,分区规则!是一本土地利用经济学教科书。菲舍尔不是专家。事实上,他的宏大理论直到书中某一章的中间才出现。和它的前身一样,分区规则!是为了探索和解释。第一章阐述了土地经济学的基本概念,以及住房供需的基本概念。第二章解释了分区法的工作原理和实施方法。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cato Journal
Cato Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REFLECTIONS ON MONETARY POLICY AND ITS FUTURE LESSONS FOR THE FED FROM THE PANDEMIC Tariffs and monetary policy: A toxic mix Restructuring the U.S. Postal Service Modern Monetary Theory: A Critique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1