Reconsidering rigor in psychological science: Lessons from a brief clinical ethnography.

IF 8.5 Q2 Psychology Qualitative Psychology Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1037/qup0000170
William E. Hartmann, Joseph P. Gone, D. S. Saint Arnault
{"title":"Reconsidering rigor in psychological science: Lessons from a brief clinical ethnography.","authors":"William E. Hartmann, Joseph P. Gone, D. S. Saint Arnault","doi":"10.1037/qup0000170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American psychologists have long defined their discipline by its methods, and ideas of rigor have been central to organizing its methodological boundaries. In pursuit of rigor, psychologists have emphasized carefully controlled experimental designs, highly scrutinized measurements, and sophisticated statistical analyses to produce generalized understandings of human behavior. The present study challenges the discipline to associate rigor with ethnographically informed inquiry contributing richly situated knowledge. The authors developed a 19-week clinical ethnography in partnership with a behavioral health clinic in a midwestern urban American Indian community health organization to understand how culture and culture concepts influenced clinical practice. Participants included 5 clinicians and 20 additional health organization administrators, staff, and volunteers involved with behavioral health services. Data collection entailed participant observation in all settings within the clinic (except client encounters), interviews with key personnel, and collection of clinic materials (e.g., clinical handouts). Data analysis was ongoing during data collection to identify patterns of interest. Following data collection, we conducted a thematic analysis of a semistructured interview with clinicians on culture and the clinic and then contextualized this interview analysis with reference to relevant patterns identified in the ethnographic data corpus. The findings highlighted a disjunction between how therapists thought about culture in the abstract during formal interviews (cultural reconnection) and how they described and demonstrated culture in day-to-day clinical practice (cultural reimagination). This contrast illustrates why a rigorous psychological science must embrace ethnographically informed modes of inquiry to represent, with specificity, contextualization, and vividness, the shared and divergent understandings and circumstances facilitating and constraining behavior in natural settings.","PeriodicalId":37522,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

American psychologists have long defined their discipline by its methods, and ideas of rigor have been central to organizing its methodological boundaries. In pursuit of rigor, psychologists have emphasized carefully controlled experimental designs, highly scrutinized measurements, and sophisticated statistical analyses to produce generalized understandings of human behavior. The present study challenges the discipline to associate rigor with ethnographically informed inquiry contributing richly situated knowledge. The authors developed a 19-week clinical ethnography in partnership with a behavioral health clinic in a midwestern urban American Indian community health organization to understand how culture and culture concepts influenced clinical practice. Participants included 5 clinicians and 20 additional health organization administrators, staff, and volunteers involved with behavioral health services. Data collection entailed participant observation in all settings within the clinic (except client encounters), interviews with key personnel, and collection of clinic materials (e.g., clinical handouts). Data analysis was ongoing during data collection to identify patterns of interest. Following data collection, we conducted a thematic analysis of a semistructured interview with clinicians on culture and the clinic and then contextualized this interview analysis with reference to relevant patterns identified in the ethnographic data corpus. The findings highlighted a disjunction between how therapists thought about culture in the abstract during formal interviews (cultural reconnection) and how they described and demonstrated culture in day-to-day clinical practice (cultural reimagination). This contrast illustrates why a rigorous psychological science must embrace ethnographically informed modes of inquiry to represent, with specificity, contextualization, and vividness, the shared and divergent understandings and circumstances facilitating and constraining behavior in natural settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新考虑心理科学的严谨性:来自简短临床人种学的教训。
长期以来,美国心理学家一直通过方法来定义他们的学科,而严谨的思想一直是组织方法论边界的核心。在追求严谨的过程中,心理学家强调精心控制的实验设计,严格审查的测量和复杂的统计分析,以产生对人类行为的一般理解。目前的研究挑战了学科的严谨与民族志知情调查贡献丰富的知识。作者与中西部城市美国印第安人社区卫生组织的行为健康诊所合作开发了一项为期19周的临床人种志,以了解文化和文化概念如何影响临床实践。参与者包括5名临床医生和另外20名参与行为健康服务的卫生组织管理人员、工作人员和志愿者。数据收集包括在诊所内所有环境中的参与者观察(除了与客户会面),与关键人员的访谈以及诊所材料的收集(例如,临床讲义)。在数据收集期间进行了数据分析,以确定感兴趣的模式。在数据收集之后,我们对临床医生进行了关于文化和诊所的半结构化访谈进行了主题分析,然后参照民族志数据语料库中确定的相关模式将访谈分析置于背景中。研究结果强调了治疗师在正式访谈中如何抽象地思考文化(文化重新连接)与他们在日常临床实践中如何描述和展示文化(文化重新想象)之间的脱节。这一对比说明了为什么一门严谨的心理科学必须采用民族志的调查模式,以专一性、情境化和生动性来代表在自然环境中促进和限制行为的共同和不同的理解和环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Psychology
Qualitative Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The mission of Qualitative Psychology journal is to foster innovative methods, theories, and empirical research in qualitative inquiry within psychology. The journal aims to highlight the unique contributions of qualitative research in advancing psychological knowledge. Published studies not only explore substantive topics but also address issues related to epistemology, the philosophy of science, and methodological criteria that impact the formulation, execution, and interpretation of qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology promotes a diverse range of methodological approaches, including narrative, discourse analysis, life history, phenomenology, ethnography, action research, and case study. Additionally, the journal puts emphasis on discussing the teaching and training of qualitative research methods to develop competent qualitative researchers.
期刊最新文献
Black girls don’t cry? Mental health, gender, and violence on the racialized periphery. The gendered racial and sexual socialization experiences of young Black women: A qualitative study. Teaching field social psychology: An action orientation to pedagogy of methods and methodologies. Reflecting back and imagining forward: Qualitative inquiry in psychology at the dawn of a new era. Actualizing transformative promises of qualitative inquiry: Early career retrospective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1