Prime ministers in minority governments: the case of Hungary

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES East European Politics Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.1080/21599165.2021.1876031
Daniel Kovarek
{"title":"Prime ministers in minority governments: the case of Hungary","authors":"Daniel Kovarek","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2021.1876031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Whereas early scholarship depicted minority cabinets as weak recent findings demonstrate how various factors contribute to effective minority governance. Nevertheless, the role of prime ministers (PMs) was largely ignored in the performance of these cabinets. The paper addresses this problem by comparing Hungary's only two minority governments in an MSSD framework. Combining a qualitative review with a quantitative analysis of voting patterns in Parliament, it argues that differences in aforementioned cabinets’ policy performance can be traced back to contrasting ideological position of PMs and subsequent ideological moderation. These findings have important implications for minority governments in majoritarian and polarised contexts.","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":"110 1","pages":"448 - 465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2021.1876031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Whereas early scholarship depicted minority cabinets as weak recent findings demonstrate how various factors contribute to effective minority governance. Nevertheless, the role of prime ministers (PMs) was largely ignored in the performance of these cabinets. The paper addresses this problem by comparing Hungary's only two minority governments in an MSSD framework. Combining a qualitative review with a quantitative analysis of voting patterns in Parliament, it argues that differences in aforementioned cabinets’ policy performance can be traced back to contrasting ideological position of PMs and subsequent ideological moderation. These findings have important implications for minority governments in majoritarian and polarised contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少数派政府的总理:匈牙利的例子
尽管早期的学术研究将少数民族内阁描述为软弱的,但最近的研究结果表明,各种因素如何有助于有效的少数民族治理。然而,在这些内阁的表现中,总理(pm)的作用在很大程度上被忽视了。本文通过比较匈牙利在MSSD框架下仅有的两个少数党政府来解决这个问题。结合对议会投票模式的定性分析和定量分析,它认为上述内阁政策表现的差异可以追溯到总理的不同意识形态立场和随后的意识形态温和。这些发现对多数主义和两极分化背景下的少数派政府具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East European Politics
East European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Are consociations bad for women? Assessing the effectiveness of gender quotas in Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia Polish martial law of 1981 as seen on Facebook. A comparative analysis between the Facebook posts of political parties Czech political parties and the war in Ukraine: continuity of foreign policy stances Comparing public attitudes towards internal and external EU sanctions: the role of populism, trust and Euroscepticism Patterns of international organizations’ engagement in reform and policy making in the post-Soviet space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1