Jonah M Rosas, Dixon J Atkins, Allison L Chau, Yen-Tsung Chen, Rachel Bae, Megan K Cavanaugh, Ricardo I Espinosa Lima, Andrew Bordeos, Michael G Bryant, Angela A Pitenis
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> models of soft tissue damage by implant-associated frictional shear stresses.","authors":"Jonah M Rosas, Dixon J Atkins, Allison L Chau, Yen-Tsung Chen, Rachel Bae, Megan K Cavanaugh, Ricardo I Espinosa Lima, Andrew Bordeos, Michael G Bryant, Angela A Pitenis","doi":"10.1177/13506501221132897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silicone elastomer medical implants are ubiquitous in medicine, particularly for breast augmentation. However, when these devices are placed within the body, disruption of the natural biological interfaces occurs, which significantly changes the native energy-dissipation mechanisms of living systems. These new interfaces can introduce non-physiological contact pressures and tribological conditions that provoke inflammation and soft tissue damage. Despite their significance, the biotribological properties of implant-tissue and implant-extracellular matrix (ECM) interfaces remain poorly understood. Here, we developed an in vitro model of soft tissue damage using a custom-built in situ biotribometer mounted onto a confocal microscope. Sections of commercially-available silicone breast implants with distinct and clinically relevant surface roughness ( R a = 0.2 ± 0.03 μ m, 2.7 ± 0.6 μ m, and 32 ± 7.0 μ m) were mounted to spherically-capped hydrogel probes and slid against collagen-coated hydrogel surfaces as well as healthy breast epithelial (MCF10A) cell monolayers to model implant-ECM and implant-tissue interfaces. In contrast to the “smooth” silicone implants ( R a < 10 μ m), we demonstrate that the “microtextured” silicone implant ( 10 < R a < 50 μ m) induced higher frictional shear stress ( τ > 100 Pa), which led to greater collagen removal and cell rupture/delamination. Our studies may provide insights into post-implantation tribological interactions between silicone breast implants and soft tissues.","PeriodicalId":29828,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Southeast European Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"1264-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683933/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Southeast European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13506501221132897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Silicone elastomer medical implants are ubiquitous in medicine, particularly for breast augmentation. However, when these devices are placed within the body, disruption of the natural biological interfaces occurs, which significantly changes the native energy-dissipation mechanisms of living systems. These new interfaces can introduce non-physiological contact pressures and tribological conditions that provoke inflammation and soft tissue damage. Despite their significance, the biotribological properties of implant-tissue and implant-extracellular matrix (ECM) interfaces remain poorly understood. Here, we developed an in vitro model of soft tissue damage using a custom-built in situ biotribometer mounted onto a confocal microscope. Sections of commercially-available silicone breast implants with distinct and clinically relevant surface roughness ( R a = 0.2 ± 0.03 μ m, 2.7 ± 0.6 μ m, and 32 ± 7.0 μ m) were mounted to spherically-capped hydrogel probes and slid against collagen-coated hydrogel surfaces as well as healthy breast epithelial (MCF10A) cell monolayers to model implant-ECM and implant-tissue interfaces. In contrast to the “smooth” silicone implants ( R a < 10 μ m), we demonstrate that the “microtextured” silicone implant ( 10 < R a < 50 μ m) induced higher frictional shear stress ( τ > 100 Pa), which led to greater collagen removal and cell rupture/delamination. Our studies may provide insights into post-implantation tribological interactions between silicone breast implants and soft tissues.