Bioequivalence study of two different dapagliflozin tablet formulations in healthy adult Indian volunteers

S. Kalra, S. Bhattacharya
{"title":"Bioequivalence study of two different dapagliflozin tablet formulations in healthy adult Indian volunteers","authors":"S. Kalra, S. Bhattacharya","doi":"10.4103/jod.jod_129_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the bioequivalence of 10 mg dapagliflozin tablets compared with that of 10 mg Farxiga® (dapagliflozin) tablets of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, USA in healthy, adult volunteers under fasting conditions. Materials and Methods: This was an open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover, oral bioequivalence study. Volunteers were randomized to receive either test product or reference product of 10 mg dapagliflozin tablets under the fasting condition with a nine-day washout period. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC) at time t (AUCt), and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf). Adverse events were assessed as safety endpoints. The bioequivalence was assessed to evaluate that the two formulations are not different from one another if the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the geometric least square means falls completely within the predefined range of 80–125%. Results: Fifty-two healthy adult volunteers were randomized, and 47 completed the study. The mean values for Cmax, AUCt, and AUCinf were almost identical for test and reference products after administration to healthy human volunteers under fasting conditions. A total of 14 adverse events were reported by 10 volunteers during the study. All adverse events were mild to moderate in nature and did not cause study withdrawal. Conclusion: The test product dapagliflozin 10 mg was bioequivalent with the reference product in healthy, adult, human volunteers under fasting conditions. The availability of the affordable generic dapagliflozin has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in millions of patients in India because of its renoprotective, cardioprotective, and glucose-lowering effects.","PeriodicalId":15627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetology","volume":"1 1","pages":"235 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jod.jod_129_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess the bioequivalence of 10 mg dapagliflozin tablets compared with that of 10 mg Farxiga® (dapagliflozin) tablets of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, USA in healthy, adult volunteers under fasting conditions. Materials and Methods: This was an open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover, oral bioequivalence study. Volunteers were randomized to receive either test product or reference product of 10 mg dapagliflozin tablets under the fasting condition with a nine-day washout period. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC) at time t (AUCt), and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf). Adverse events were assessed as safety endpoints. The bioequivalence was assessed to evaluate that the two formulations are not different from one another if the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the geometric least square means falls completely within the predefined range of 80–125%. Results: Fifty-two healthy adult volunteers were randomized, and 47 completed the study. The mean values for Cmax, AUCt, and AUCinf were almost identical for test and reference products after administration to healthy human volunteers under fasting conditions. A total of 14 adverse events were reported by 10 volunteers during the study. All adverse events were mild to moderate in nature and did not cause study withdrawal. Conclusion: The test product dapagliflozin 10 mg was bioequivalent with the reference product in healthy, adult, human volunteers under fasting conditions. The availability of the affordable generic dapagliflozin has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in millions of patients in India because of its renoprotective, cardioprotective, and glucose-lowering effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同的达格列净片制剂在印度健康成人志愿者体内的生物等效性研究
目的:评价10 mg达格列净片与美国阿斯利康公司(AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, USA) 10 mg Farxiga®(达格列净)片在健康成人空腹条件下的生物等效性。材料和方法:这是一项开放标签、平衡、随机、两治疗、两期、两序列、单剂量、交叉、口服生物等效性研究。志愿者在禁食条件下随机接受10 mg达格列净片的试验产品或参考产品,并有9天的洗脱期。主要药代动力学(PK)参数为最大血药浓度(Cmax)、t时刻曲线下面积(AUC) (AUCt)和外推至无穷大的AUC (AUCinf)。不良事件作为安全终点进行评估。如果几何最小二乘平均值比值的90%置信区间完全落在预定的80-125%范围内,则对生物等效性进行评估,以评价两种配方之间没有差异。结果:52名健康成人志愿者被随机选取,其中47人完成了研究。健康志愿者在禁食条件下给药后,测试产品和参考产品的Cmax、AUCt和AUCinf的平均值几乎相同。10名志愿者在研究期间共报告了14起不良事件。所有不良事件的性质均为轻度至中度,未导致研究退出。结论:试验产品达格列净10mg与对照产品在空腹条件下具有生物等效性。可负担得起的仿制药dapagliflozin的可用性有可能改善印度数百万患者的临床结果,因为它具有保护肾脏、保护心脏和降低血糖的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emerging glucagon-based therapies in diabetes mellitus: Toward a better future in diabetes care Eating disorders and type 1 diabetes as a significant problem An update on the role of antihyperglycemic agents in diabetoporosis Effect of combination of Curcuma longa with Emblica officinalis in females with polycystic ovarian syndrome: An open-label, randomized active-controlled, exploratory clinical study Maternally inherited diabetes mellitus and deafness (MIDD): A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1