Challenges, policy and politics in drug checking: reflections of the TEDItorial team

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drugs, habits and social policy Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.1108/dhs-10-2022-0037
Nicolas Van der Linden, Raoul Koning, Daan van der Gouwe, Mireia Ventura, F. Measham
{"title":"Challenges, policy and politics in drug checking: reflections of the TEDItorial team","authors":"Nicolas Van der Linden, Raoul Koning, Daan van der Gouwe, Mireia Ventura, F. Measham","doi":"10.1108/dhs-10-2022-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to present some of the continued resistance and challenges faced by drug checking services (DCS) and review how the existing literature and the contributions to the special issue address them, with a view to making recommendations.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe existing literature and the contributions to the special issue are reviewed.\n\n\nFindings\nDrug checking cannot be equated with quality control. With the appropriate equipment and chemistry staff, DCS can provide quantitative analysis and reliable results. When the product does not match expectations, service users discard the tested substance of concern. To more easily compare the results of different studies and better evaluate drug checking, standardisation of measures is desirable. Uptake of drug checking, notably in festivals, is low and depends in part on the capacity of DCS. Drug checking has added value in monitoring drug markets and is complementary with chemical (forensic) analysis.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper interrogates in a relatively comprehensive way the continued resistance to drug checking in light of theoretical and empirical research to derive recommendations that are specific to drug checking and that are addressed to health professionals, researchers and also to policymakers.\n","PeriodicalId":72849,"journal":{"name":"Drugs, habits and social policy","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs, habits and social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-10-2022-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present some of the continued resistance and challenges faced by drug checking services (DCS) and review how the existing literature and the contributions to the special issue address them, with a view to making recommendations. Design/methodology/approach The existing literature and the contributions to the special issue are reviewed. Findings Drug checking cannot be equated with quality control. With the appropriate equipment and chemistry staff, DCS can provide quantitative analysis and reliable results. When the product does not match expectations, service users discard the tested substance of concern. To more easily compare the results of different studies and better evaluate drug checking, standardisation of measures is desirable. Uptake of drug checking, notably in festivals, is low and depends in part on the capacity of DCS. Drug checking has added value in monitoring drug markets and is complementary with chemical (forensic) analysis. Originality/value This paper interrogates in a relatively comprehensive way the continued resistance to drug checking in light of theoretical and empirical research to derive recommendations that are specific to drug checking and that are addressed to health professionals, researchers and also to policymakers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物检查中的挑战、政策和政治:编辑团队的思考
本文旨在介绍药品检查服务(DCS)面临的一些持续的阻力和挑战,并回顾现有文献和对特刊的贡献,以期提出建议。设计/方法/方法回顾现有文献和对特刊的贡献。发现药品检查不能等同于质量控制。有了合适的设备和化学人员,DCS可以提供定量分析和可靠的结果。当产品不符合期望时,服务用户就会丢弃所关注的测试物质。为了更容易地比较不同研究的结果,更好地评价药物检查,需要标准化的措施。毒品检查的使用率很低,特别是在节日期间,这部分取决于DCS的能力。药物检查增加了监测毒品市场的价值,并与化学(法医)分析相辅相成。原创性/价值本文根据理论和实证研究,以相对全面的方式询问对药物检查的持续抵制,以得出针对药物检查的建议,并针对卫生专业人员、研究人员和政策制定者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural variations in conceptualization of excessive drinking among young adults in Denmark, Estonia and Italy Pandemic-related changes in alcohol use among LGB+ people with and without mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions: a multinational cross-sectional study Implications of legalisation of cannabis cultivation in Ghana: a critical review Family ties: examining family functioning and alcohol use among American Indian youth Ayahuasca ceremonies: set and setting features across Italy and Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1