Single centre experience with the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap for traumatic limb defects: A case-series for first year as a regional major trauma network during a global pandemic

Zoe Li , Stephen R. Ali , Nicholas Marsden , Ahmed Emam
{"title":"Single centre experience with the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap for traumatic limb defects: A case-series for first year as a regional major trauma network during a global pandemic","authors":"Zoe Li ,&nbsp;Stephen R. Ali ,&nbsp;Nicholas Marsden ,&nbsp;Ahmed Emam","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2022.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The free superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap evolved from the traditional groin flap, conferring numerous advantages. The thin nature of the flap avoids the need for secondary revisions and debulking procedures, particularly pertinent when theatre capacity was limited during the COVID-19 pandemic. We present a series reporting our centre's first year experiences undertaking SCIP flap reconstruction for traumatic limb injuries following the establishment of our regional major trauma network.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for traumatic limb defects in our centre was undertaken between September 2020 to September 2021. Data was collected on patient demographics, injury, flap dimensions and flap survival.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten patients (M:F 1:1, mean age 45 years) with traumatic limb defects were reconstructed with SCIP flaps performed by the senior authors. All had sustained open fractures. Nine had lower limb defects, most commonly at the medial ankle, one had a volar wrist defect with a devascularised hand. The mean flap dimension was 6.3 × 14.5 cm. All were anastomosed end-to-side to the recipient artery except one end-to-end anastomosis to a posterior tibial artery perforator using super-microsurgery. There was 100% flap survival. Complications consisted of one flap suffering &lt;10% tip necrosis requiring debridement and small skin graft.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SCIP flap provides reliable, thin and pliable tissue without the need for secondary flap revisions and should be considered in the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon in extremity trauma reconstruction, particularly in the current environment surrounding the global pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 50-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X22000197/pdfft?md5=230b01f92f8b1b2a399b54a9414ed00d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666769X22000197-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X22000197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

The free superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap evolved from the traditional groin flap, conferring numerous advantages. The thin nature of the flap avoids the need for secondary revisions and debulking procedures, particularly pertinent when theatre capacity was limited during the COVID-19 pandemic. We present a series reporting our centre's first year experiences undertaking SCIP flap reconstruction for traumatic limb injuries following the establishment of our regional major trauma network.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for traumatic limb defects in our centre was undertaken between September 2020 to September 2021. Data was collected on patient demographics, injury, flap dimensions and flap survival.

Results

Ten patients (M:F 1:1, mean age 45 years) with traumatic limb defects were reconstructed with SCIP flaps performed by the senior authors. All had sustained open fractures. Nine had lower limb defects, most commonly at the medial ankle, one had a volar wrist defect with a devascularised hand. The mean flap dimension was 6.3 × 14.5 cm. All were anastomosed end-to-side to the recipient artery except one end-to-end anastomosis to a posterior tibial artery perforator using super-microsurgery. There was 100% flap survival. Complications consisted of one flap suffering <10% tip necrosis requiring debridement and small skin graft.

Conclusion

The SCIP flap provides reliable, thin and pliable tissue without the need for secondary flap revisions and should be considered in the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon in extremity trauma reconstruction, particularly in the current environment surrounding the global pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旋髂浅动脉穿支(SCIP)皮瓣治疗创伤性肢体缺损的单中心经验:在全球大流行期间作为区域性主要创伤网络的第一年病例系列
游离旋髂浅动脉穿支(SCIP)皮瓣是由传统的腹股沟皮瓣发展而来的,具有许多优点。皮瓣的薄特性避免了二次修复和减容手术的需要,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间,手术室容量有限。我们提出了一系列报告我们中心第一年的经验进行SCIP皮瓣重建创伤性肢体损伤后,我们的区域主要创伤网络的建立。材料与方法回顾性分析2020年9月至2021年9月在我中心接受创伤性肢体缺损治疗的所有患者。收集了患者人口统计学、损伤、皮瓣尺寸和皮瓣存活率的数据。结果10例外伤性肢体缺损患者(男女比例1:1,平均年龄45岁)采用SCIP皮瓣重建。所有患者均有开放性骨折。9例下肢缺损,最常见于踝关节内侧,1例掌侧腕关节缺损,手部血管断流。皮瓣平均尺寸6.3 × 14.5 cm。除一例端对端吻合胫骨后动脉穿支外,其余均端侧吻合于受体动脉。皮瓣存活率为100%。并发症包括一个皮瓣出现10%的尖端坏死,需要清创和小皮肤移植。结论SCIP皮瓣提供了可靠、薄而柔韧性的组织,无需二次皮瓣修复,在肢体创伤重建中,特别是在当前全球大流行的环境下,应考虑重建外科医生的装备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spino-plastic surgery Erratum regarding previously published articles Editorial Board Composite osteo-tendino-cutaneous reverse radial forearm flap for complex thumb reconstruction: A case report The keystone island perforator flap: An “ideal” local soft tissue flap for the lower extremity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1