Optimal Distance of The Long Jump Approach Run Calculated Using Quadratic Regression Equation Approximation in Female College Students Attending A Physical Education Class

Kazuhiro Matsui, Akihiro Azuma
{"title":"Optimal Distance of The Long Jump Approach Run Calculated Using Quadratic Regression Equation Approximation in Female College Students Attending A Physical Education Class","authors":"Kazuhiro Matsui, Akihiro Azuma","doi":"10.15758/AJK.2019.21.3.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine whether the calculation-based distance (CBD) of approach run, which was obtained using quadratic regression equation approximation, was optimal for jump distance in running long jump in female college students attending a physical education activity class. METHODS Forty-seven healthy female college students (17.2 ± 0.4 years) were included in the study. The CBDs were calculated by themselves using a graphing calculator as their learning activity. CBDs were based on four jump distances and approach-run distances (including self-selected distance [SSD]). RESULTS There was no significant difference between maximal SSD (JDSSD) and maximal CBD (JDCBD). There was no significant difference between SSD and CBD. Moreover, on average, there was no significant difference between JDSSD and JDCBD. From the viewpoint of individual differences of delta in JDCBD−JDSSD, the association with the speed-effectiveness index (SEI), as one of the jump skill metric, was investigated. The correlation coefficient between SEI and delta in JDCBD−JDSSD was not significant. CONCLUSION In this study, female college students would determine SSD as much as theoretical optimal approach-run distance (CBD) derived by their own quadratic regression model in spite of their jump skill.","PeriodicalId":22264,"journal":{"name":"The Asian Journal of Kinesiology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asian Journal of Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15758/AJK.2019.21.3.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine whether the calculation-based distance (CBD) of approach run, which was obtained using quadratic regression equation approximation, was optimal for jump distance in running long jump in female college students attending a physical education activity class. METHODS Forty-seven healthy female college students (17.2 ± 0.4 years) were included in the study. The CBDs were calculated by themselves using a graphing calculator as their learning activity. CBDs were based on four jump distances and approach-run distances (including self-selected distance [SSD]). RESULTS There was no significant difference between maximal SSD (JDSSD) and maximal CBD (JDCBD). There was no significant difference between SSD and CBD. Moreover, on average, there was no significant difference between JDSSD and JDCBD. From the viewpoint of individual differences of delta in JDCBD−JDSSD, the association with the speed-effectiveness index (SEI), as one of the jump skill metric, was investigated. The correlation coefficient between SEI and delta in JDCBD−JDSSD was not significant. CONCLUSION In this study, female college students would determine SSD as much as theoretical optimal approach-run distance (CBD) derived by their own quadratic regression model in spite of their jump skill.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用二次回归方程逼近法计算女大学生体育课跳远助跑最佳距离
目的探讨女大学生参加体育活动课跑跳远时,采用二次回归方程近似得到的接近跑的计算距离(CBD)是否最优。方法选取47名健康女大学生(17.2±0.4岁)作为研究对象。CBDs是他们自己用图形计算器计算的,作为他们的学习活动。CBDs基于四种跳跃距离和接近距离(包括自选距离[SSD])。结果最大SSD (JDSSD)与最大CBD (JDCBD)无显著性差异。SSD与CBD之间无显著差异。此外,平均而言,JDSSD和JDCBD之间没有显著差异。从JDCBD - JDSSD的个体差异角度,研究了delta与作为跳跃技能指标之一的速度-有效性指数(SEI)的关系。JDCBD - JDSSD中SEI与delta的相关系数不显著。结论在本研究中,尽管女大学生的跳跃技术水平较高,但其对SSD的影响程度与用自己的二次回归模型推导出的理论最优接近-跑距(CBD)的影响程度相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Philosophical Analysis of the Name of the Discipline ‘Physical Education’ and Proposal of Alternative Terminology Effects of Regular Aerobic Exercise on Cardiovascular Health Factors and Heart Function in Sedentary Male Office Workers The Reflection on the Originality of the Study of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences in Japan Introduction for Proceedings of a Panel Discussion on an Alternative Name of Physical Education in the East Asian Cultural Sphere Reconsidering the Hierarchy and Translation of “Physical Education/Sports” Related Terms: Taiwan Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1