Khaled Ahmat, Samer M. Barakat, S. Altoubat, Mohamad Alhalabi
{"title":"Probabilistic assessment of ACI 318 minimum thickness requirements for two-way slabs","authors":"Khaled Ahmat, Samer M. Barakat, S. Altoubat, Mohamad Alhalabi","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2022.2134354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following the ACI 318 design code and to control deflections, structural engineers must adhere to minimum thickness requirements for reinforced concrete (RC) slabs. However, these requirements do not account for various influencing variables such as span length, aspect ratio and applied live load. This paper assesses the adequacy of the ACI 318 minimum thickness requirements for two-way RC slabs through a probabilistic approach using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). The probability distribution of the span-to-depth ratio (SDR) was fitted to the Burr distribution, and the goodness-of-fit test was applied to assess the fitting. Then, the effect of span length, aspect ratio, and live load on the maximum allowable SDR was evaluated, considering all material properties and applied loads as random variables. The analyses have shown a high correlation between the studied variables and the SDR. Therefore, multiple regression analysis was carried out, and four prediction models were proposed to conservatively predict the SDR for two-way slabs. The accuracy of the prediction models was statistically tested by comparing calculated to predicted SDR values, and a 10% maximum relative error was exhibited. The proposed prediction models were accurate for all practical ranges of span length, aspect ratio and live load in two-way slabs.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2134354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Following the ACI 318 design code and to control deflections, structural engineers must adhere to minimum thickness requirements for reinforced concrete (RC) slabs. However, these requirements do not account for various influencing variables such as span length, aspect ratio and applied live load. This paper assesses the adequacy of the ACI 318 minimum thickness requirements for two-way RC slabs through a probabilistic approach using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). The probability distribution of the span-to-depth ratio (SDR) was fitted to the Burr distribution, and the goodness-of-fit test was applied to assess the fitting. Then, the effect of span length, aspect ratio, and live load on the maximum allowable SDR was evaluated, considering all material properties and applied loads as random variables. The analyses have shown a high correlation between the studied variables and the SDR. Therefore, multiple regression analysis was carried out, and four prediction models were proposed to conservatively predict the SDR for two-way slabs. The accuracy of the prediction models was statistically tested by comparing calculated to predicted SDR values, and a 10% maximum relative error was exhibited. The proposed prediction models were accurate for all practical ranges of span length, aspect ratio and live load in two-way slabs.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.