A Model for Assessing Regional Sustainable Development Based on the Index Method

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-4
S. Borodin
{"title":"A Model for Assessing Regional Sustainable Development Based on the Index Method","authors":"S. Borodin","doi":"10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of development opportunities for socio-economic systems is particularly relevant in the context of constantly changing macroeconomic conditions. A retrospective analysis is an important step in assessing development opportunities at the regional level. Based on a presented model for assess-ing regional sustainable development, the article analyses statistical data of the regions included in the Central, Northwestern and Southern Federal Districts for the period 2005-2019. According to the concept of sustainable development, the indicators were divided into three subgroups: social, economic and environ-mental. The following results were obtained. Social indicators revealed positive dynamics in the number of regions developing sustainably until 2014; later, the number changed erratically every year, ranging from 21 to 38. Economic indicators demonstrated negative dynamics in the number of sustainable regions un-til 2014. In the period 2014-2019, an abrupt fluctuation from 13 to 32 units was observed. Environmental indicators show that, on average, half of the examined regions managed to develop sustainably. After de-termining the overall index, the rate of change of the index was identified. Then, a sustainable develop-ment matrix was constructed, where 1 means that the index value increased year-on-year or remained the same, and 0 means that the index value decreased year-on-year. The findings can be used for ranking re-gions by summing up values in the region’s row of the sustainability matrix. The study may also serve as a basis for identifying the relationship between various large-scale phenomena such as the economic crisis, pandemic, the development of digital currency markets and changes in regional sustainability indicators.","PeriodicalId":47897,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","volume":"86 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of development opportunities for socio-economic systems is particularly relevant in the context of constantly changing macroeconomic conditions. A retrospective analysis is an important step in assessing development opportunities at the regional level. Based on a presented model for assess-ing regional sustainable development, the article analyses statistical data of the regions included in the Central, Northwestern and Southern Federal Districts for the period 2005-2019. According to the concept of sustainable development, the indicators were divided into three subgroups: social, economic and environ-mental. The following results were obtained. Social indicators revealed positive dynamics in the number of regions developing sustainably until 2014; later, the number changed erratically every year, ranging from 21 to 38. Economic indicators demonstrated negative dynamics in the number of sustainable regions un-til 2014. In the period 2014-2019, an abrupt fluctuation from 13 to 32 units was observed. Environmental indicators show that, on average, half of the examined regions managed to develop sustainably. After de-termining the overall index, the rate of change of the index was identified. Then, a sustainable develop-ment matrix was constructed, where 1 means that the index value increased year-on-year or remained the same, and 0 means that the index value decreased year-on-year. The findings can be used for ranking re-gions by summing up values in the region’s row of the sustainability matrix. The study may also serve as a basis for identifying the relationship between various large-scale phenomena such as the economic crisis, pandemic, the development of digital currency markets and changes in regional sustainability indicators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于指数法的区域可持续发展评价模型
在宏观经济条件不断变化的情况下,对社会经济制度发展机会的评估尤其重要。回顾分析是评估区域一级发展机会的重要步骤。本文基于构建的区域可持续发展评估模型,对2005-2019年中央联邦区、西北联邦区和南部联邦区的统计数据进行了分析。根据可持续发展的概念,这些指标分为三组:社会、经济和环境。得到了以下结果:社会指标显示,到2014年可持续发展的区域数量呈现积极态势;后来,这个数字每年都在变化,从21个到38个不等。直到2014年,经济指标显示可持续区域的数量呈负动态。在2014-2019年期间,观测到从13个单位到32个单位的突变波动。环境指标显示,平均而言,所审查的区域中有一半设法实现可持续发展。确定总体指标后,确定指标的变化率。然后构建可持续发展矩阵,其中1表示指标值同比增加或保持不变,0表示指标值同比减少。研究结果可以通过总结可持续性矩阵中各区域的值来对各地区进行排名。该研究还可作为确定经济危机、流行病、数字货币市场发展与区域可持续性指标变化等各种大规模现象之间关系的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The polarisation of Italian metropolitan areas, 2000–2018: structural change, technology and growth Rural areas as winners of COVID-19, digitalization and remote working? Empirical evidence from recent internal migration in Germany Firm interconnectedness and resilience: evidence from the Italian manufacturing Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland Localised waste reduction networks, global destruction networks and the circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1