What are Australian drivers doing behind the wheel? An overview of secondary task data from the Australian Naturalistic Driving Study

K. Young, R. Osborne, S. Koppel, J. Charlton, R. Grzebieta, A. Williamson, N. Haworth, J. Woolley, T. Senserrick
{"title":"What are Australian drivers doing behind the wheel? An overview of secondary task data from the Australian Naturalistic Driving Study","authors":"K. Young, R. Osborne, S. Koppel, J. Charlton, R. Grzebieta, A. Williamson, N. Haworth, J. Woolley, T. Senserrick","doi":"10.33492/JACRS-D-18-00085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using data from the Australian Naturalistic Driving Study (ANDS), this study examined patterns of secondary task engagement (e.g., mobile phone use, manipulating centre stack controls) during everyday driving trips to determine the type and duration of secondary task engaged in. Safety-related incidents associated with secondary task engagement were also examined. Results revealed that driver engagement in secondary tasks was frequent, with drivers engaging in one or more secondary tasks every 96 seconds, on average. However, drivers were more likely to initiate engagement in secondary tasks when the vehicle was stationary, suggesting that drivers do self-regulate the timing of task engagement to a certain degree. There was also evidence that drivers modified their engagement in a way suggestive of limiting their exposure to risk by engaging in some secondary tasks for shorter periods when the vehicle was moving compared to when it was stationary. Despite this, almost six percent of secondary tasks events were associated with a safety-related incident. The findings will be useful in targeting distraction countermeasures and policies and determining the effectiveness of these in managing driver distraction.","PeriodicalId":43503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/JACRS-D-18-00085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Using data from the Australian Naturalistic Driving Study (ANDS), this study examined patterns of secondary task engagement (e.g., mobile phone use, manipulating centre stack controls) during everyday driving trips to determine the type and duration of secondary task engaged in. Safety-related incidents associated with secondary task engagement were also examined. Results revealed that driver engagement in secondary tasks was frequent, with drivers engaging in one or more secondary tasks every 96 seconds, on average. However, drivers were more likely to initiate engagement in secondary tasks when the vehicle was stationary, suggesting that drivers do self-regulate the timing of task engagement to a certain degree. There was also evidence that drivers modified their engagement in a way suggestive of limiting their exposure to risk by engaging in some secondary tasks for shorter periods when the vehicle was moving compared to when it was stationary. Despite this, almost six percent of secondary tasks events were associated with a safety-related incident. The findings will be useful in targeting distraction countermeasures and policies and determining the effectiveness of these in managing driver distraction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚的司机在开车时做什么?澳大利亚自然驾驶研究的次要任务数据概述
利用澳大利亚自然驾驶研究(ANDS)的数据,本研究检查了日常驾驶过程中次要任务参与的模式(例如,使用手机,操纵中央堆栈控制),以确定次要任务参与的类型和持续时间。与次要任务参与相关的安全相关事件也进行了检查。结果显示,司机参与次要任务的频率很高,平均每96秒就会参与一个或多个次要任务。然而,当车辆处于静止状态时,驾驶员更有可能开始参与次要任务,这表明驾驶员确实在一定程度上自我调节任务参与的时间。也有证据表明,与车辆静止时相比,当车辆行驶时,驾驶员会在较短的时间内从事一些次要任务,从而在某种程度上改变了他们的参与方式,从而限制了他们面临的风险。尽管如此,近6%的次要任务事件与安全相关的事件有关。研究结果将有助于制定分心对策和政策,并确定这些措施和政策在管理司机分心方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Selected Bibliography Frontmatter Acknowledgments The relative efficacy of positively and negatively valenced road safety campaign messages in improving dangerous driving attitudes Community participation in road safety policy development and strategy planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1