Racial Differences in Severe Maternal Morbidity Exist for Tricare Beneficiaries [ID: 1377133]

E. Lyon, Veronica M Gonzalez-Brown, E. Keyser, Katherine Porter, R. Tindal
{"title":"Racial Differences in Severe Maternal Morbidity Exist for Tricare Beneficiaries [ID: 1377133]","authors":"E. Lyon, Veronica M Gonzalez-Brown, E. Keyser, Katherine Porter, R. Tindal","doi":"10.1097/01.AOG.0000930252.58330.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Maternal morbidity and mortality rates in the United States have increased in the last two decades with a disproportionate effect on women of color. Military Tricare coverage models universal health care access; however, in studies looking at births in military treatment facilities, disparities still exist for women of color. This study analyzes maternal delivery outcomes for all women with Tricare coverage including deliveries in the civilian sector. METHODS: Data from 6.2 million births in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER Linked Birth/Infant Death Records for 2017–2019 were analyzed for all-cause morbidity (transfusions, perineal lacerations, uterine rupture, unplanned hysterectomy, and intensive care unit admissions), severe maternal morbidity (SMM) (excludes lacerations), and SMM excluding transfusion. Risk ratios were calculated comparing overall maternal morbidity rates between Tricare, Medicaid, self-pay, and private insurance. In addition, risk ratios were calculated between insurance types stratified by race. RESULTS: Compared to private insurance, Tricare insurance had significantly reduced risk of all-cause maternal morbidity. Compared to White women, Black women with Tricare and all other insurances had a decreased risk of all-cause morbidity, but a significantly increased risk of SMM and SMM without transfusion. Asian women had significant increased risk of all-cause, SMM and SMM without transfusion. There was no significant difference in the risk of morbidity for women of color with Tricare insurance compared to women of color with Medicaid, private, or self-pay insurance. CONCLUSION: The risk of severe maternal morbidity remains elevated for women of color despite access to Tricare health insurance.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000930252.58330.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Maternal morbidity and mortality rates in the United States have increased in the last two decades with a disproportionate effect on women of color. Military Tricare coverage models universal health care access; however, in studies looking at births in military treatment facilities, disparities still exist for women of color. This study analyzes maternal delivery outcomes for all women with Tricare coverage including deliveries in the civilian sector. METHODS: Data from 6.2 million births in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER Linked Birth/Infant Death Records for 2017–2019 were analyzed for all-cause morbidity (transfusions, perineal lacerations, uterine rupture, unplanned hysterectomy, and intensive care unit admissions), severe maternal morbidity (SMM) (excludes lacerations), and SMM excluding transfusion. Risk ratios were calculated comparing overall maternal morbidity rates between Tricare, Medicaid, self-pay, and private insurance. In addition, risk ratios were calculated between insurance types stratified by race. RESULTS: Compared to private insurance, Tricare insurance had significantly reduced risk of all-cause maternal morbidity. Compared to White women, Black women with Tricare and all other insurances had a decreased risk of all-cause morbidity, but a significantly increased risk of SMM and SMM without transfusion. Asian women had significant increased risk of all-cause, SMM and SMM without transfusion. There was no significant difference in the risk of morbidity for women of color with Tricare insurance compared to women of color with Medicaid, private, or self-pay insurance. CONCLUSION: The risk of severe maternal morbidity remains elevated for women of color despite access to Tricare health insurance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tricare受益人严重产妇发病率的种族差异[j]
简介:在过去的二十年中,美国的孕产妇发病率和死亡率有所上升,有色人种妇女的发病率和死亡率尤其高。军事Tricare覆盖模式是全民医疗保健;然而,在对军队治疗设施中分娩的研究中,有色人种女性仍然存在差异。本研究分析了所有Tricare覆盖妇女的分娩结果,包括在民用部门分娩。方法:分析美国疾病控制和预防中心2017-2019年与WONDER相关的出生/婴儿死亡记录中620万例出生的数据,包括全因发病率(输血、会阴撕裂伤、子宫破裂、计划外子宫切除术和重症监护病房入院)、严重孕产妇发病率(不包括撕裂伤)和不包括输血的SMM。计算风险比,比较Tricare、Medicaid、自费和私人保险的总体孕产妇发病率。此外,还计算了按种族分层的保险类型之间的风险比率。结果:与私人保险相比,Tricare保险显著降低了全因孕产妇发病的风险。与白人妇女相比,有Tricare和所有其他保险的黑人妇女全因发病风险降低,但SMM和未输血的SMM风险显著增加。亚洲妇女的全因、SMM和不输血的SMM风险显著增加。有色人种女性在Tricare保险中的发病率与有色人种女性在医疗补助、私人或自费保险中的发病率没有显著差异。结论:尽管有色人种妇女享有Tricare健康保险,但其严重孕产妇发病率的风险仍然较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1