Cross-border cooperation in the border region of Germany, France, and Luxembourg in times of Covid-19

IF 2.3 1区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY European Societies Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.1080/14616696.2022.2076894
Florian Weber
{"title":"Cross-border cooperation in the border region of Germany, France, and Luxembourg in times of Covid-19","authors":"Florian Weber","doi":"10.1080/14616696.2022.2076894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The process of European integration has tended to diminish the significance of borders within the EU. In that respect, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in spring 2020 was all the greater: 35 years after the signing of the Schengen Agreement, checks and closures suddenly reappeared at many former border crossing points; long queues at crossing points, families and friends cut off from each other, and complex individual fates descended like a pall on European societies. At the same time, the advanced state of integration of borderlands became apparent - a striking example being the SaarLorLux region across the common borders of Germany, France, and Luxembourg. The article inquires into the political response to the impact of the Corona crisis across this border region. The analysis shows that on many levels SaarLorLux is perceived as a tightly meshed integration area in which functional exchange is normal, and that a corresponding ideational shock was felt at all political levels when border controls were reintroduced. However, the situation also had positive effects in terms of cross-border cooperation. Many political actors see the institutionalization of cross-border integration as having grown in the pandemic and are unanimous in wanting future developments in this respect.","PeriodicalId":47392,"journal":{"name":"European Societies","volume":"22 1","pages":"354 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2022.2076894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT The process of European integration has tended to diminish the significance of borders within the EU. In that respect, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in spring 2020 was all the greater: 35 years after the signing of the Schengen Agreement, checks and closures suddenly reappeared at many former border crossing points; long queues at crossing points, families and friends cut off from each other, and complex individual fates descended like a pall on European societies. At the same time, the advanced state of integration of borderlands became apparent - a striking example being the SaarLorLux region across the common borders of Germany, France, and Luxembourg. The article inquires into the political response to the impact of the Corona crisis across this border region. The analysis shows that on many levels SaarLorLux is perceived as a tightly meshed integration area in which functional exchange is normal, and that a corresponding ideational shock was felt at all political levels when border controls were reintroduced. However, the situation also had positive effects in terms of cross-border cooperation. Many political actors see the institutionalization of cross-border integration as having grown in the pandemic and are unanimous in wanting future developments in this respect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情下德、法、卢森堡三国边境地区跨境合作
欧洲一体化的进程已经削弱了欧盟内部边界的重要性。在这方面,2020年春季2019冠状病毒病大流行的影响更大:在《申根协定》签署35年后,许多以前的过境点突然重新出现检查和关闭;过境点排长队,家人和朋友之间的联系被切断,复杂的个人命运像一层阴影笼罩在欧洲社会上。与此同时,边境地区一体化的先进状态变得明显——一个引人注目的例子是跨越德国、法国和卢森堡共同边界的萨尔-洛勒克斯地区。本文探讨了该边境地区对冠状病毒危机影响的政治反应。分析表明,在许多层面上,萨洛勒克斯被视为一个紧密交织的一体化地区,在这个地区,功能交流是正常的,当重新引入边境管制时,所有政治层面都感到了相应的观念冲击。然而,这种情况在跨境合作方面也产生了积极影响。许多政治行为者认为,跨界一体化的制度化在这一流行病中有所发展,并一致希望在这方面取得进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Societies
European Societies SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.20%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: European Societies, the flagship journal of the European Sociological Association, aims to promote and share sociological research related to Europe. As a generalist sociology journal, we welcome research from all areas of sociology. However, we have a specific focus on addressing the socio-economic and socio-political challenges faced by European societies, as well as exploring all aspects of European social life and socioculture. Our journal is committed to upholding ethical standards and academic independence. We conduct a rigorous and anonymous review process for all submitted manuscripts. This ensures the quality and integrity of the research we publish. European Societies encourages a plurality of perspectives within the sociology discipline. We embrace a wide range of sociological methods and theoretical approaches. Furthermore, we are open to articles that adopt a historical perspective and engage in comparative research involving Europe as a whole or specific European countries. We also appreciate comparative studies that include societies beyond Europe. In summary, European Societies is dedicated to promoting sociological research with a focus on European societies. We welcome diverse methodological and theoretical approaches, historical perspectives, and comparative studies involving Europe and other societies.
期刊最新文献
Settling into uncertainty and risk amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine Gender compositions of occupations and firms jointly shape switches from gender-atypical towards more gender-typical positions The effect of the month of birth on academic achievement: heterogeneity by social origin and gender Do they think that joy and misery are temporary? Comparing trajectories of current and predicted life satisfaction across life events Narrowing inequalities through redistribution. A relational inequality approach to female managers and the gender wage gap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1