Criminal Responsibility towards Criminals of Abortion in Indonesia

Q2 Social Sciences Law Environment and Development Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-07 DOI:10.30659/ldj.3.1.9-18
Zahri Aeniwati, S. Kusriyah
{"title":"Criminal Responsibility towards Criminals of Abortion in Indonesia","authors":"Zahri Aeniwati, S. Kusriyah","doi":"10.30659/ldj.3.1.9-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine and describe the criminal liability of perpetrators of abortion in Indonesia. This research is a doctrinal legal research, which is descriptive analysis. The data used is secondary data obtained through library research, which is then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this research show that criminal liability for perpetrators of abortion in Indonesia based on the Criminal Code is regulated in Book Two of Chapter XIV on Crimes of Decency, especially Article 299, and Chapter XIX Articles 346-Articles 349 which are classified as crimes against life. The prohibition on abortion in the Criminal Code is contained in Article 299, Article 346, Article 347, Article 348, and Article 349, which clearly regulates the prohibition of having an abortion for any reason, including abortion for emergency reasons (forced). The provisions for regulating abortion in Act No 36 of 2009 are set forth in Article 75, Article 76, Article 77, and Article 194. Even though, the law prohibits the practice of abortion, in certain circumstances there is a possibility. Abortion practices that are contrary to statutory regulations are regulated in Article 194 of Act No 36 Of 2009, with a maximum imprisonment of 10 years and a maximum fine of IDR 1,000,000,000.00 (one billion rupiah).­","PeriodicalId":55646,"journal":{"name":"Law Environment and Development Journal","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Environment and Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.1.9-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine and describe the criminal liability of perpetrators of abortion in Indonesia. This research is a doctrinal legal research, which is descriptive analysis. The data used is secondary data obtained through library research, which is then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this research show that criminal liability for perpetrators of abortion in Indonesia based on the Criminal Code is regulated in Book Two of Chapter XIV on Crimes of Decency, especially Article 299, and Chapter XIX Articles 346-Articles 349 which are classified as crimes against life. The prohibition on abortion in the Criminal Code is contained in Article 299, Article 346, Article 347, Article 348, and Article 349, which clearly regulates the prohibition of having an abortion for any reason, including abortion for emergency reasons (forced). The provisions for regulating abortion in Act No 36 of 2009 are set forth in Article 75, Article 76, Article 77, and Article 194. Even though, the law prohibits the practice of abortion, in certain circumstances there is a possibility. Abortion practices that are contrary to statutory regulations are regulated in Article 194 of Act No 36 Of 2009, with a maximum imprisonment of 10 years and a maximum fine of IDR 1,000,000,000.00 (one billion rupiah).­
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚堕胎犯罪分子的刑事责任
本研究旨在确定和描述印度尼西亚堕胎肇事者的刑事责任。本研究是一项理论法学研究,属于描述性分析。使用的数据是通过图书馆研究获得的二手数据,然后对其进行定性分析。本研究结果表明,印尼《刑法》第十四章第二卷关于体面罪,特别是第299条和第十九章第346- 349条规定了堕胎行为人的刑事责任,这些条款被归类为危害生命罪。《刑法》第299条、第346条、第347条、第348条和第349条载有禁止堕胎的规定,其中明确规定禁止以任何理由堕胎,包括紧急原因(强迫)堕胎。2009年第36号法第75条、第76条、第77条和第194条规定了对堕胎的规定。尽管法律禁止堕胎,但在某些情况下还是有可能的。2009年第36号法令第194条规定了违反法定规定的堕胎做法,最高可判处10年监禁,最高可处以10亿印尼盾(10亿印尼盾)的罚款
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Juridical Analysis in Viewing the Position of Reported Revocation of Complaints A General Criminal One Party by the Reporter in Investigation Process The Criminological Ideas in the Criminal Enforcement of Illegal Logging The Criminal Policy in Efforts to Overcome Crimes Perpetrated by the Indonesian National Army An Investigator's Discretion in State Assets Confiscation Criminal Action Case of Corruption The Legal Protection for Children as Criminal Actors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1