Teachers’ perceptions of data management as educational resource

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy Pub Date : 2020-10-09 DOI:10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-03-04
T. Hoel, Weiqin Chen, Lu Yu
{"title":"Teachers’ perceptions of data management as educational resource","authors":"T. Hoel, Weiqin Chen, Lu Yu","doi":"10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-03-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction of data-driven tools and practices in education may improve learning but also change education in ways not yet fully understood. Globally, ministries are now beginning to define big data policies for schools. How will this influence the work of teachers, and how do they want to engage with the new sources of information? This study compares two cases from Norway and China, two countries with very different educational systems and cultures, and different implementation policies. In a survey, a hundred primary and secondary school teachers from each country were asked what they wanted to know about their students, and what data they wanted educational big data analysis to be based upon. Qualitative analysis of learning technology infrastructure projects in Tongzhou district in Beijing and in Oslo and national policies provided a backdrop for interpreting the teachers’ answers. Focus group interviews with teachers gave additional insights into the different approaches to educational big data. This study shows that Chinese teachers have a much more open mind and interest for all information data may provide, while Norwegian teachers are more focussed on knowledge acquisition and would like to limit the scope to learning and teaching the curriculum, being concerned about questions related to privacy and data surveillance. Some of these differences could be explained by the differences in context of introducing big data in schools. In China, economic innovation is the driver, while in Norway the pretext for the introduction of learning analytics is adapted education. This study contributes to the knowledge of how data policies will impact on design of learning analytics tools and solutions. Approaches and technologies in this field have a global scope. Therefore, understanding how personal digital data is perceived in different cultural contexts is vital for both development and implementation.","PeriodicalId":44945,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","volume":"9 1","pages":"178-189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-03-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction of data-driven tools and practices in education may improve learning but also change education in ways not yet fully understood. Globally, ministries are now beginning to define big data policies for schools. How will this influence the work of teachers, and how do they want to engage with the new sources of information? This study compares two cases from Norway and China, two countries with very different educational systems and cultures, and different implementation policies. In a survey, a hundred primary and secondary school teachers from each country were asked what they wanted to know about their students, and what data they wanted educational big data analysis to be based upon. Qualitative analysis of learning technology infrastructure projects in Tongzhou district in Beijing and in Oslo and national policies provided a backdrop for interpreting the teachers’ answers. Focus group interviews with teachers gave additional insights into the different approaches to educational big data. This study shows that Chinese teachers have a much more open mind and interest for all information data may provide, while Norwegian teachers are more focussed on knowledge acquisition and would like to limit the scope to learning and teaching the curriculum, being concerned about questions related to privacy and data surveillance. Some of these differences could be explained by the differences in context of introducing big data in schools. In China, economic innovation is the driver, while in Norway the pretext for the introduction of learning analytics is adapted education. This study contributes to the knowledge of how data policies will impact on design of learning analytics tools and solutions. Approaches and technologies in this field have a global scope. Therefore, understanding how personal digital data is perceived in different cultural contexts is vital for both development and implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对数据管理作为教育资源的看法
在教育中引入数据驱动的工具和实践可能会改善学习,但也会以尚未完全理解的方式改变教育。在全球范围内,各部委现在开始为学校制定大数据政策。这将如何影响教师的工作,他们希望如何参与新的信息来源?本研究比较了挪威和中国的两个案例,这两个国家有着非常不同的教育制度和文化,以及不同的实施政策。在一项调查中,来自每个国家的100名中小学教师被问及他们希望了解自己的学生,以及他们希望基于哪些数据进行教育大数据分析。对北京通州区和奥斯陆的学习技术基础设施项目以及国家政策的定性分析为解读教师的回答提供了背景。对教师的焦点小组访谈让我们对教育大数据的不同方法有了更多的了解。这项研究表明,中国教师对数据可能提供的所有信息持更开放的态度和兴趣,而挪威教师更注重知识获取,希望将范围限制在课程的学习和教学中,担心与隐私和数据监控相关的问题。其中一些差异可以用在学校引入大数据的不同背景来解释。在中国,经济创新是驱动因素,而在挪威,引入学习分析的借口是适应教育。本研究有助于了解数据策略将如何影响学习分析工具和解决方案的设计。该领域的方法和技术具有全球性。因此,了解个人数字数据在不同文化背景下的感知方式对于开发和实施都至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Why Are Norwegian Education Authorities Digitising Education? Digital nødundervisning under covid-19-nedstengning Physiotherapy Students’ Shaping of Digital Learning Practices: Characteristics, Opportunities and Challenges Reading in the digital age Læringsanalyse – tilbakeblikk og frampek
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1